SIXTH CIRCUIT FUCKS OVER POLICE SHOOTING VICTIM; FUCKED UP CASE
| Lascivious Temple | 07/19/17 | | Lascivious Temple | 07/19/17 | | Soul-stirring Avocado Rigpig Incel | 07/19/17 | | brass senate | 07/19/17 | | Lascivious Temple | 07/19/17 | | brass senate | 07/19/17 | | Lascivious Temple | 07/19/17 | | Amethyst Juggernaut | 07/19/17 | | Yellow floppy quadroon death wish | 07/19/17 | | Lascivious Temple | 07/19/17 | | transparent theater | 07/19/17 | | Lascivious Temple | 07/19/17 | | splenetic brethren factory reset button | 07/19/17 | | drab spot | 07/19/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: July 19th, 2017 5:11 PM Author: transparent theater
The dissent was unhinged. After a high speed chase in the rain with speeds exceeding 100 mph, which concluded in the middle of nowhere, this occurred:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-aTO6JImA0
The suspect had demonstrated he was determined to avoid apprehension, and he was moving towards the officer to beat his ass.
As a matter of departmental policy, it would be perfectly reasonable to implement a policy where the police disengage in such situations instead of using lethal force. However, just because one reasonable approach to this situation does not entail the use of lethal force does not preclude the reasonableness of using lethal force from a constitutional perspective. It was perfectly reasonable for the officer to fear for his life in this situation, meaning it was a good shot.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3679324&forum_id=2#33811008) |
|
|