Trumps criminal defense lawyer DROPS HAMMER on Mueller (link)
| Supple abode | 07/23/17 | | floppy rehab turdskin | 07/23/17 | | sable alcoholic heaven mother | 07/23/17 | | Internet-worthy dashing associate | 07/23/17 | | Supple abode | 07/23/17 | | bateful magenta theater stage love of her life | 07/24/17 | | Supple abode | 07/24/17 | | Supple abode | 07/23/17 | | Supple abode | 07/23/17 | | trip rebellious voyeur church building | 07/23/17 | | Supple abode | 07/23/17 | | irradiated gay sweet tailpipe wagecucks | 07/24/17 | | Supple abode | 07/25/17 | | Supple abode | 07/24/17 | | Motley flirting cumskin | 07/24/17 | | lilac boyish forum | 07/24/17 | | Supple abode | 07/24/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 23rd, 2017 2:22 PM Author: Supple abode
An attorney for President Donald Trump praised the work of prosecutors involved in the Russia investigation and disputed the notion that the White House or Mr. Trump’s legal team was working to discredit or short-circuit the special counsel probe.
John Dowd, one of the main outside lawyers representing Mr. Trump in the Russia investigation, said in an interview Friday that Special Counsel Robert Mueller has been doing “a good job” and can be trusted to carry out a fair investiga-tion.
The Washington Post on Thursday reported that Mr. Trump’s legal team is discussing the president’s authority to issue pardons that could potentially derail the Russia probe. Mr. Dowd denied the report. “It’s not true,” Mr. Dowd said.
Mr. Dowd, in the interview Friday, dismissed the notion that the Trump team would try to undercut the special counsel’s investigation by highlighting what it sees as conflicts of interest.
“We’re not interested in that,” he said. “We all know him and we’re not interested at all in that kind of collateral nonsense.”
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3682705&forum_id=2#33837280) |
Date: July 24th, 2017 12:44 AM Author: Motley flirting cumskin
checking identity of president
trump still president
shitlibs still irate.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3682705&forum_id=2#33840962) |
|
|