\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Always funny when Biglaw firms get worked up about legal opinions

At my old biglaw firm, these would be a battle. Now at my...
Arousing Autistic Foreskin Nowag
  07/24/17
...
slate senate rigor
  07/24/17
No shit the client doesn't care if the law firm's opinion is...
aromatic stag film
  07/24/17
...
lilac exhilarant church roast beef
  07/25/17
There's no reason to give opinion letters unless it's some h...
irradiated death wish
  07/24/17
legal opinions in securities offerings are fucking hilarious...
Turquoise ladyboy
  07/24/17
i thought you meant like an alarm would go off and the inter...
Wine floppy university
  07/24/17
...
lascivious parlor ape
  07/25/17
TWO. PARTNER. APPROVAL.
sick fanboi national security agency
  07/24/17
...
Federal obsidian regret
  07/25/17
rofl holy shit legal opinions are so faggot
Turquoise ladyboy
  07/24/17
we literally have an "opinion committee" of a half...
slate senate rigor
  07/24/17
(Could be a lot of firms but most recently skadden)
Exciting lake cuckoldry
  07/25/17
huge fags itt
Walnut confused kitty halford
  07/24/17
(gunner non-equity partner on his firm's opinion cmmttee)
Turquoise ladyboy
  07/25/17
...
Exciting lake cuckoldry
  07/25/17
Opinion committees ime are always comprised of two or three ...
flickering rebellious area
  07/24/17
...
slate senate rigor
  07/24/17
We have reviewed all the stuff. If the data is accurate and...
Scarlet hospital
  07/24/17
...
bateful idea he suggested
  07/25/17
rofl cr
Turquoise ladyboy
  07/25/17
would also have accepted "here is our weighty legal opi...
Turquoise ladyboy
  07/25/17


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 24th, 2017 9:59 PM
Author: Arousing Autistic Foreskin Nowag

At my old biglaw firm, these would be a battle.

Now at my boutique, we basically just give the lender whatever they reasonably request....knowing that the odds they are ever enforced is basically zero and our clients prefer we spend their money on more important things.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33847500)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 24th, 2017 10:04 PM
Author: slate senate rigor



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33847548)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 24th, 2017 10:07 PM
Author: aromatic stag film

No shit the client doesn't care if the law firm's opinion is shit because it is the firm's ass/reputation on the line if the opinion is wrong.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33847566)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2017 12:52 AM
Author: lilac exhilarant church roast beef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33848863)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 24th, 2017 10:02 PM
Author: irradiated death wish

There's no reason to give opinion letters unless it's some huge deal and they are paying you a ton.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33847533)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 24th, 2017 10:04 PM
Author: Turquoise ladyboy

legal opinions in securities offerings are fucking hilarious

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33847549)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 24th, 2017 10:03 PM
Author: Wine floppy university

i thought you meant like an alarm would go off and the intercom "please report to the conference room, the 9th circuit just issued five opinions with 20 plus page opinions. we have ice cream."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33847536)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2017 12:37 AM
Author: lascivious parlor ape



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33848760)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 24th, 2017 10:03 PM
Author: sick fanboi national security agency

TWO. PARTNER. APPROVAL.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33847541)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2017 12:59 AM
Author: Federal obsidian regret



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33848903)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 24th, 2017 10:04 PM
Author: Turquoise ladyboy

rofl holy shit legal opinions are so faggot

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33847545)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 24th, 2017 10:06 PM
Author: slate senate rigor

we literally have an "opinion committee" of a half dozen partners. almost impossible to get anything done

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33847555)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2017 12:37 AM
Author: Exciting lake cuckoldry

(Could be a lot of firms but most recently skadden)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33848750)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 24th, 2017 10:06 PM
Author: Walnut confused kitty halford

huge fags itt

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33847557)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2017 12:05 AM
Author: Turquoise ladyboy

(gunner non-equity partner on his firm's opinion cmmttee)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33848533)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2017 12:37 AM
Author: Exciting lake cuckoldry



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33848755)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 24th, 2017 10:06 PM
Author: flickering rebellious area

Opinion committees ime are always comprised of two or three rainmakers who have no idea what theyre signing (except the tax weirdo) and are never there to sign it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33847563)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 24th, 2017 10:08 PM
Author: slate senate rigor



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33847577)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 24th, 2017 10:14 PM
Author: Scarlet hospital

We have reviewed all the stuff. If the data is accurate and the agreement terms are as presented by the issuer and the financial statements are accurate then we think your okay. But we cant say anything about any of thoee thongs because they are all someone else's responsibility. Xoxohth!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33847624)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2017 12:03 AM
Author: bateful idea he suggested



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33848524)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2017 12:03 AM
Author: Turquoise ladyboy

rofl cr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33848526)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 25th, 2017 12:04 AM
Author: Turquoise ladyboy

would also have accepted "here is our weighty legal opinion on the transaction in question: {2 paragraphs}. and here are our exceptions and qualifications: {9 pages}."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3684007&forum_id=2#33848530)