The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Under Pruneyard, First Amendment should apply to Google in CA
| Disgusting comical dopamine | 08/08/17 |
| elite heaven water buffalo | 08/08/17 |
| Disgusting comical dopamine | 08/10/17 |
| low-t multi-colored round eye | 08/10/17 |
| irate clown stead | 08/10/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 8th, 2017 10:24 AM Author: Disgusting comical dopamine Apologies for this law-related post. But in the retarded Pruneyard decision, the Cal. Supreme Court held that the First Amendment applies to SHOPPING MALLS because they "provide an essential and invaluable forum for exercising those rights [of speech and petition]." If that is true for shopping malls (it isn't), it's 100x more true for Internet search engines, particularly one with the vast majority of the market share like Google does. It would make no sense to hold that a privately owned shopping mall is somehow a more important public venue for distributing speech than Google. The CASC had the chance to overrule Pruneyard a couple years ago and didn't, over a MAF dissent. So these 105 IQ "No First Amendment rights over private companies!" claims aren't even true in California. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3695277&forum_id=2#33941123) |
Date: August 8th, 2017 10:29 AM Author: elite heaven water buffalo Fascinating
Also strong poast/moniker synergy |
 |
Date: August 10th, 2017 10:06 AM Author: Disgusting comical dopamine ty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3695277&forum_id=2#33956023) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2017 10:18 AM Author: low-t multi-colored round eye nah, acting as an employer, even the fucking gov't gets away with extra shit in that context (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3695277&forum_id=2#33956075) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2017 10:49 AM Author: irate clown stead But Pruneyard rests in part on the idea that ca has broader 1A protections than the Fed gov, or pretty much anywhere else. If a fucking mall gets that treatment, wht not an internal blog where people are encouraged to discus difficult issues?
Im sure the ca courts will find a way to shitlib their way out of it but there's really no reason Pruneyard shouldn't apply. |