The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Anybody ever read biglaw partner divorce trial transcripts for the lolz?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 14th, 2017 5:54 PM Author: comical pistol I just happened to come across an appeal decision involving the divorce of a biglaw partner I used to work for. He was making $2M a year at the time of the divorce. They had an estate of about $5M. His wife became a stay-at-home mom and eventually left him for her yoga instructor / boyfriend. The court extensively documented his failing health and medical problems.
He ended up getting gaped for $15K a month "maintenance," including a ton of retroactive payments. The court ruled this was not tax-deductible for him, not taxable income for her, and would not end even if she remarries. The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.
He also is on the hook for $10K a month in child support, again including a ton of retroactive payments.
Lastly, he is required to pay over $500K in legal fees that she acquired in contesting the divorce payouts. The court was not happy that he used strategies similar to what he used while representing large commercial clients in litigation, which greatly increased attorney costs.
She is now working full time after a 15-year break to raise the kids. He is apparently broke as fuck. His health is failing, he is on disability, and his legal career is done.
I also looked up the yoga instructor / boyfriend. He is jacked as fuck. The former biglaw bro desparately tried to bring in texts/emails between his wife and the yoga guy, but the court excluded all of that correspondence.
I've heard xo say guys get fucked in divorce court, but holy shit. This is devastating. |
 |
Date: August 14th, 2017 9:24 PM Author: Dull Laser Beams convert all assets to crypto --> hie thee to Thailand. HTH. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33989592) |
Date: August 14th, 2017 5:58 PM Author: tripping area $15k/month for a guy making $2m/year is steep but hardly back breaking enough to render him broke. The $10k/month is rough but probably comes to an end soon and I believe is tax deductible. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987878) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:02 PM Author: comical pistol His legal career ended shortly after the divorce. He is getting some disability now, but nothing like $2m/year. Not sure what he is paying the $15k/month out of, I guess savings.
You are probably right about the child support. |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:08 PM Author: Doobsian mauve ticket booth Well if that's the case he can file a motion to modify spousal and child support to reflect his new income. As long as his disability is legitimate (i.e. he didn't just retire to screw over his wife and kids' standard of living), no reasonable court would hold him to the same terms in perpetuity. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987948) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:15 PM Author: comical pistol The decision indicates the amount is reviewable in 4 years, although he was apparently already on the hook for almost $700K in retroactive maintainance at the time of the order. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33988003) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 12:42 PM Author: Thriller Office Hominid Why can't he just retire if he wants to? That's a real retarded way to view personal decisions (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993459) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 12:45 PM Author: comical pistol In this case, the court did not question his medical issues, which seemed pretty legit (cancerous tumors, diabetes, various other diseases). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993476) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:07 PM Author: Thriller Office Hominid Yeah but why should he need a medical reason to change job or career. If he wants to become a park ranger, why is it the court's business? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993627) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:10 PM Author: comical pistol I don't know. I can't see a good reason why he needed to keep forking over $300k cash a year to her tax-free. In this case, she had resumed working and he was on disability.
I understand the basic rational for maintenance, but it seems like it should be capped at some reasonable number like the avg household income in the country (e.g., $60K a year). |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:13 PM Author: Thriller Office Hominid It should be capped at what she would receive in welfare. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993693) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2017 10:50 PM Author: Amethyst dashing sandwich Because our legal system is fucked. If you take a job making less money, the court will IMPUTE income. If you're making 2M a year, you are now EXPECTED to make 2M a year... for ever. See Robin Williams suicide.
Also, Child Support payments ARE NOT tax deductible.
Any MAN considering marriage in this day and age is literally insane. The only caveat is if the woman makes more money, then it's fine. |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:00 PM Author: Peach Cracking Hissy Fit Corner 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987888) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:03 PM Author: deranged indirect expression This is why guys shouldn't get married. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987914) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:04 PM Author: pungent house How does the court rule what is and isn't tax-deductible? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987924) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:06 PM Author: Doobsian mauve ticket booth I don't think the court rules that, but just parrots what the tax code says. Could be wrong, though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987936) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:07 PM Author: pungent house My 15 seconds of family law for bar prep says that alimony payments are above the line tax deduction for payer and count as taxable income for payee. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987940) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:10 PM Author: comical pistol But apparently divorce courts can designate maintainance payments as not alimony. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987962) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:07 PM Author: crimson shivering den preventive strike cq (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987945) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:08 PM Author: claret legend cq (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987949) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:09 PM Author: comical pistol As best I understand it, it comes down to whether the maintainance payments should be considered alimony, which is tax-deductable. Here, the court ruled that the payments were to continue even if one of the parties died. So, they weren't alimony, and thus he can't deduct them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987956) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:27 PM Author: Odious walnut mediation lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33988087) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:05 PM Author: 180 chocolate university codepig I don't know how this could be so one sided (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987929) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:05 PM Author: deranged indirect expression You live in a gynocentric western society filled with feminists and betas who are afraid to upset/offend a woman...why are you surprised? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987932) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:08 PM Author: Odious walnut mediation
also, most of Nyuug's poasting is unverified boasting, but he has some great stuff on this. |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:50 PM Author: comical pistol It seems like he got fucked particularly hard because he tried to fight it. Should've just settled for whatever she demanded. Would've at least avoided her attorney fees. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33988246) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 2:32 PM Author: zombie-like nursing home ladyboy (delusional) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33994365) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:05 PM Author: out-of-control rehab toxic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987933) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:06 PM Author: boyish cuck Why do courts rule that anyone gets to maintain that type of std of living? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987935) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:06 PM Author: Odious walnut mediation The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987937) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:12 PM Author: Salmon business firm private investor wow (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987973) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:28 PM Author: Odious walnut mediation how many kids had they produced, did it say? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33988094) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:30 PM Author: comical pistol 2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33988103) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:30 PM Author: Gold flatulent dilemma Any reason why child support and maintainence payments should not be capped at a low level (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33988101) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:36 PM Author: Vigorous Indian Lodge Out the case citation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33988144) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:36 PM Author: Odious walnut mediation probably outing himself unless he was randomly searching for biglaw bros he is already a pumo bro tho... |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:41 PM Author: Vigorous Indian Lodge He'd only out himself as one of the 50 different associates who worked under that partner at some point, and even then only to people who had the capability of compiling that list of 50 associates and were reading this thread. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33988174) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:40 PM Author: comical pistol Come to think of it, I remember one time he flew 8 hours round trip in a day to attend a court hearing for work. The reason he did this was because he couldn't afford to be away from his kids for a night during his scheduled time with them. He said this would hurt his position in the divorce proceedings if he was away for a night. I remember thinking that all was really strange at the time, given that he was already in poor health. I don't think he was even 50 years old. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33988171) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 7:00 PM Author: Brilliant tank Saddest thing is, you know his wife started fucking around because his health problems made it difficult to dick her down hard (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33988327) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 7:02 PM Author: comical pistol Well, that plus constantly working, constantly being stressed, etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33988335) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 12:59 PM Author: Thriller Office Hominid She was probably fucking around long before. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993574) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 7:40 PM Author: Arousing Aggressive Set Is it expensive to get the trial transcript? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33988673) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 9:09 PM Author: comical pistol I dunno I was actually just reading a published opinion that cited to the transcript. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33989464) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 2:46 PM Author: zombie-like nursing home ladyboy link? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33994473) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 9:21 PM Author: razzle well-lubricated lettuce mental disorder I used to work with a partner that got gaped in divorce related court proceedings. Nice guy but a Federal Court of Appeals completely gaped him and called him out by name. Was lulzy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33989563) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 10:05 PM Author: comical pistol Initials? Might be the same guy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33990012) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 11:56 PM Author: garnet keepsake machete How does a divorce get in federal court? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33990954) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2017 11:49 PM Author: razzle well-lubricated lettuce mental disorder think he filed a claim under the takings clause not flame (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#34214802) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 10:40 PM Author: deranged indirect expression Can someone explain why so many guys continue to marry after seeing things like this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33990278) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 10:46 PM Author: Nubile Space Ratface the fact that men allow this system to persist is embarrassing.
the whole idea a woman should get to maintain her 'standard of living' after divorce is absurd as well. |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 10:49 PM Author: deranged indirect expression MGTOW men don't allow it to persists since they walk away completely, only the cucks and betas who marry (despite knowing all of this) do. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33990359) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 11:36 PM Author: comical pistol This court opinion went on and on about the sacrifices she made as a stay at home mom. As far as I could tell, they never mentioned the sacrifices this dude made to last 25 yrs in biglaw. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33990806) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 11:36 PM Author: Odious walnut mediation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33990807) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:02 PM Author: Thriller Office Hominid It's insane. Not even sure how you make a case for it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993606) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 10:51 PM Author: Orange mildly autistic step-uncle's house prole I would divorce my wife the day she decided to SAHM. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33990373) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 10:13 AM Author: comical pistol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33992544) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 11:00 PM Author: Motley doctorate LO fucking L at making 2 mil a year and having a net worth of 5 mil. Pathetic. This guy was completely, totally, irretrievably made into the world's bitch. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33990449) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 11:33 PM Author: comical pistol It does seem low but he wasn't making 2M for long. He had one big client that had a huge case ramping up to trial at that time. He was well below 2M a few years prior. And after the case settled, he had nothing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33990774) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:07 PM Author: Elite vivacious affirmative action 5 mil before the divorce lol. MAYBE POSSIBLY worth $1 million now which I'll be sneaking up on as a 20-hour-a-week solo bro half his age. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993629) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 11:43 PM Author: comical pistol I found a recent article about this guy. The article was about how more older people are renting rather than buying. He was renting an apartment and said how happy he was to not have the burden of a house. He's most likely under $1M net worth now, and still probably forking over $180K cash a year to his ex-wife and her yoga instructor. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33990862) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:08 PM Author: Elite vivacious affirmative action gotta do what you gotta do to justify your own existence when you're too big a pussy to do the deed
edit: GOD DAMN can you imagine knowing that at least part of your alimony/maintenance was going to pay for some loser the love of your life is now fucking? |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:12 PM Author: comical pistol It appeared that a big part of the evidence he was trying to get in with the emails/texts was to show that she was spending a lot of his money on the yoga guy. Never made it into court though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993673) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 11:46 PM Author: pale insane gas station He should have paternity tested the kids. I'm sure at least one isn't his. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33990888) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 11:49 PM Author: comical pistol If you are married, you still gotta pay. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33990904) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:10 PM Author: Elite vivacious affirmative action lol @ marriage. just lol. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993662) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 11:55 PM Author: Dun whorehouse was she hot? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33990949) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2017 11:59 PM Author: comical pistol No, at least not in the photos I saw which were all fairly recent. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33990973) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 10:17 AM Author: Bronze boiling water queen of the night California? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33992562) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 12:11 PM Author: comical pistol No (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993222) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 12:22 PM Author: Stirring faggot firefighter Delightful flame. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993299) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 12:42 PM Author: comical pistol Ha, wish I was that creative. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993455) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:03 PM Author: Thriller Office Hominid ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993610) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 12:23 PM Author: Dull Laser Beams holy fuck it's stickied! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993302) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 12:25 PM Author: Salmon business firm private investor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993326) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 12:33 PM Author: Hairraiser Bearded Pit Regret how old was the partner, the wife, and the yoga guy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993372) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 12:41 PM Author: comical pistol Partner is 7 years older than her. I'm not sure the yoga guy's exact age, but I think it's about the same as her. He does look to be in great shape for his age. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993453) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 12:49 PM Author: Territorial Cerise Rigor Why not just kill the bitch? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993505) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 12:53 PM Author: comical pistol Crazy thing is it took 10 years from when she initially filed for divorce for the process to end. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993535) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:04 PM Author: Thriller Office Hominid How long had they been married? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993614) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:06 PM Author: comical pistol 17 yrs. He was 35 and she was 28 when they got married. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993623) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:08 PM Author: Thriller Office Hominid So she filed after seventeen years? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993636) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:12 PM Author: comical pistol right. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993678) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:11 PM Author: Elite vivacious affirmative action recipe for disaster (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993672) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:12 PM Author: comical pistol Which part? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993681) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:15 PM Author: Elite vivacious affirmative action 35/28. 28 is prime "I NEED TO GET MARRIED TO ANYONE BEFORE 30" shrew territory (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993708) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:17 PM Author: comical pistol So what's a good age combination? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33993724) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 2:06 PM Author: judgmental aphrodisiac hunting ground Two years or less.Scholarship tells us that the farther apart in age 2 people are the more likely they are to get divorced. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33994137) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 2:24 PM Author: comical pistol what scholarship? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33994304) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 2:44 PM Author: judgmental aphrodisiac hunting ground https://secure.marketwatch.com/story/the-bigger-the-age-gap-the-shorter-the-marriage-2014-11-11 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33994456) |
|
Date: August 16th, 2017 1:53 AM Author: Submissive stag film So if a bro is 35, your advice is for him to look 33-35? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33999895) |
|
Date: August 15th, 2017 1:59 PM Author: zombie-like nursing home ladyboy OJ I understand (yes, I do read these for the lulz) |
|
Date: August 18th, 2017 4:35 AM Author: Odious walnut mediation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#34017373) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2017 10:37 PM Author: Odious walnut mediation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#34214382) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2017 10:39 PM Author: Bateful tanning salon really tough guy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#34214403) |
|
Date: September 15th, 2017 2:11 AM Author: Electric garrison there are STILL literally stupid fucks on xoxo who insist their country is first world.
i read threads like this and just feel bad for the massive delusions of said dummies |