Anybody ever read biglaw partner divorce trial transcripts for the lolz?
| burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/14/17 | | Bisexual concupiscible dilemma | 08/14/17 | | Maroon cruise ship dog poop | 08/14/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/14/17 | | titillating shivering legend | 08/14/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/14/17 | | bossy theater stage | 08/15/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/15/17 | | bossy theater stage | 08/15/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/15/17 | | bossy theater stage | 08/15/17 | | Hairraiser nudist temple | 09/14/17 | | cerebral forum psychic | 08/14/17 | | twisted background story sanctuary | 08/14/17 | | vibrant voyeur school | 08/14/17 | | titillating shivering legend | 08/14/17 | | vibrant voyeur school | 08/14/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/14/17 | | Boyish library | 08/14/17 | | scarlet boiling water cumskin | 08/14/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/14/17 | | excitant federal area | 08/14/17 | | Sick Laughsome Fanboi Dopamine | 08/14/17 | | twisted background story sanctuary | 08/14/17 | | excitant federal area | 08/14/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/14/17 | | Fragrant senate windowlicker | 08/15/17 | | Chrome Really Tough Guy Church Building | 08/14/17 | | Transparent knife | 08/14/17 | | excitant federal area | 08/14/17 | | gay galvanic preventive strike | 08/14/17 | | excitant federal area | 08/14/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/14/17 | | Disrespectful Hairy Legs | 08/14/17 | | idiotic mood | 08/14/17 | | excitant federal area | 08/14/17 | | idiotic mood | 08/14/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/14/17 | | Plum Nofapping Cuckold Locale | 08/14/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/14/17 | | bossy theater stage | 08/15/17 | | overrated piazza | 08/14/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/14/17 | | Fragrant senate windowlicker | 08/15/17 | | haunting orchestra pit | 08/14/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/14/17 | | floppy scourge upon the earth rigpig | 08/14/17 | | haunting orchestra pit | 09/14/17 | | twisted background story sanctuary | 08/14/17 | | supple tanning salon | 08/14/17 | | twisted background story sanctuary | 08/14/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/14/17 | | excitant federal area | 08/14/17 | | bossy theater stage | 08/15/17 | | cobalt range | 08/14/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/15/17 | | doobsian 180 codepig | 08/14/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/14/17 | | gaped very tactful parlor | 08/15/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/14/17 | | gaped very tactful parlor | 08/15/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/15/17 | | light ticket booth indirect expression | 08/14/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/14/17 | | gaped very tactful parlor | 08/15/17 | | talented mad-dog skullcap | 08/14/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/14/17 | | painfully honest stage patrolman | 08/15/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/15/17 | | electric nighttime center kitty cat | 08/15/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/15/17 | | bossy theater stage | 08/15/17 | | Bisexual concupiscible dilemma | 08/15/17 | | gay galvanic preventive strike | 08/15/17 | | chocolate pozpig | 08/15/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/15/17 | | arousing theater kitty | 08/15/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/15/17 | | bossy theater stage | 08/15/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/15/17 | | bossy theater stage | 08/15/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/15/17 | | gaped very tactful parlor | 08/15/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/15/17 | | gaped very tactful parlor | 08/15/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/15/17 | | Stirring pearly menage macaca | 08/15/17 | | burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action | 08/15/17 | | Stirring pearly menage macaca | 08/15/17 | | chestnut passionate bawdyhouse sneaky criminal | 08/16/17 | | Fragrant senate windowlicker | 08/15/17 | | excitant federal area | 08/18/17 | | excitant federal area | 09/14/17 | | bonkers home tank | 09/14/17 | | Charismatic fantasy-prone national | 09/15/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 14th, 2017 5:54 PM Author: burgundy aphrodisiac affirmative action
I just happened to come across an appeal decision involving the divorce of a biglaw partner I used to work for. He was making $2M a year at the time of the divorce. They had an estate of about $5M. His wife became a stay-at-home mom and eventually left him for her yoga instructor / boyfriend. The court extensively documented his failing health and medical problems.
He ended up getting gaped for $15K a month "maintenance," including a ton of retroactive payments. The court ruled this was not tax-deductible for him, not taxable income for her, and would not end even if she remarries. The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.
He also is on the hook for $10K a month in child support, again including a ton of retroactive payments.
Lastly, he is required to pay over $500K in legal fees that she acquired in contesting the divorce payouts. The court was not happy that he used strategies similar to what he used while representing large commercial clients in litigation, which greatly increased attorney costs.
She is now working full time after a 15-year break to raise the kids. He is apparently broke as fuck. His health is failing, he is on disability, and his legal career is done.
I also looked up the yoga instructor / boyfriend. He is jacked as fuck. The former biglaw bro desparately tried to bring in texts/emails between his wife and the yoga guy, but the court excluded all of that correspondence.
I've heard xo say guys get fucked in divorce court, but holy shit. This is devastating.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987832) |
|
Date: September 14th, 2017 10:50 PM Author: Hairraiser nudist temple
Because our legal system is fucked. If you take a job making less money, the court will IMPUTE income. If you're making 2M a year, you are now EXPECTED to make 2M a year... for ever. See Robin Williams suicide.
Also, Child Support payments ARE NOT tax deductible.
Any MAN considering marriage in this day and age is literally insane. The only caveat is if the woman makes more money, then it's fine.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#34214462) |
Date: August 14th, 2017 6:06 PM Author: excitant federal area
The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.The court reasoned that she must've had a high standard of living during their marriage for the estate to only be worth $5M, so this standard of living must be maintained.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33987937) |
Date: August 14th, 2017 10:46 PM Author: supple tanning salon
the fact that men allow this system to persist is embarrassing.
the whole idea a woman should get to maintain her 'standard of living' after divorce is absurd as well.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#33990331) |
Date: September 15th, 2017 2:11 AM Author: Charismatic fantasy-prone national
there are STILL literally stupid fucks on xoxo who insist their country is first world.
i read threads like this and just feel bad for the massive delusions of said dummies
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3701063&forum_id=2#34215362) |
|
|