Choosing Biglaw SA
| Ruby Chapel Giraffe | 08/17/17 | | bat shit crazy nowag mental disorder | 08/17/17 | | Ruby Chapel Giraffe | 08/17/17 | | bat shit crazy nowag mental disorder | 08/17/17 | | dead concupiscible personal credit line shrine | 08/17/17 | | irradiated avocado water buffalo | 08/17/17 | | bat shit crazy nowag mental disorder | 08/17/17 | | dead concupiscible personal credit line shrine | 08/17/17 | | irradiated avocado water buffalo | 08/17/17 | | Histrionic base | 08/17/17 | | irradiated avocado water buffalo | 08/17/17 | | Histrionic base | 08/17/17 | | irradiated avocado water buffalo | 08/17/17 | | Histrionic base | 08/17/17 | | dead concupiscible personal credit line shrine | 08/17/17 | | irradiated avocado water buffalo | 08/17/17 | | dead concupiscible personal credit line shrine | 08/17/17 | | irradiated avocado water buffalo | 08/17/17 | | Offensive disgusting theater stage | 08/17/17 | | Mustard filthy school cafeteria main people | 08/17/17 | | titillating dark elastic band | 08/17/17 | | Mustard filthy school cafeteria main people | 08/17/17 | | Histrionic base | 08/17/17 | | irradiated avocado water buffalo | 08/17/17 | | red aphrodisiac office nibblets | 08/17/17 | | irradiated avocado water buffalo | 08/17/17 | | Ruby Chapel Giraffe | 08/17/17 | | red aphrodisiac office nibblets | 08/17/17 | | Scarlet newt | 08/17/17 | | disrespectful grizzly lodge | 08/17/17 | | bespoke incel stead | 08/17/17 | | Fiercely-loyal Jap Location | 08/17/17 | | Ruby Chapel Giraffe | 08/17/17 | | bespoke incel stead | 08/17/17 | | Ruby Chapel Giraffe | 08/17/17 | | bespoke incel stead | 08/17/17 | | Magenta lay associate | 08/17/17 | | Ruby Chapel Giraffe | 08/17/17 | | Mustard filthy school cafeteria main people | 08/17/17 | | Sexy forum love of her life | 08/17/17 | | Ruby Chapel Giraffe | 08/17/17 | | Offensive disgusting theater stage | 08/17/17 | | Ruby Chapel Giraffe | 08/19/17 | | motley national | 08/17/17 | | laughsome slap-happy church building dog poop | 08/17/17 | | irradiated avocado water buffalo | 08/17/17 | | Impertinent hairy legs | 08/17/17 | | irradiated avocado water buffalo | 08/17/17 | | Impertinent hairy legs | 08/17/17 | | irradiated avocado water buffalo | 08/17/17 | | Impertinent hairy legs | 08/17/17 | | misanthropic odious public bath | 08/17/17 | | irradiated avocado water buffalo | 08/17/17 | | misanthropic odious public bath | 08/17/17 | | motley national | 08/17/17 | | laughsome slap-happy church building dog poop | 08/17/17 | | Impertinent hairy legs | 08/17/17 | | laughsome slap-happy church building dog poop | 08/17/17 | | Impertinent hairy legs | 08/17/17 | | laughsome slap-happy church building dog poop | 08/17/17 | | Impertinent hairy legs | 08/17/17 | | laughsome slap-happy church building dog poop | 08/17/17 | | lemon floppy bbw digit ratio | 08/17/17 | | motley national | 08/17/17 | | laughsome slap-happy church building dog poop | 08/17/17 | | motley national | 08/17/17 | | lemon floppy bbw digit ratio | 08/17/17 | | Offensive disgusting theater stage | 08/17/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: August 17th, 2017 7:56 PM Author: Histrionic base
You can get equal experience at the firms, but what Nutella is talking about is that for in-house you're normally interviewing for a specialized area (not some general corporate position) so your firm's prestige/reputation w/r/t that specialized area is important, i.e., specialized area >>> vault ranking when interviewing for inhouse. So, like, you've probably never heard of Seward & Kissel, but if you're doing fund work they are about as good as any other shop.
Once you go in-house, attorneys don't want to train someone from the ground up. Sure, there is some leeway, but not much. They'll figure, shit I can get a K&E associate but then I'd have to train them to do X type of work, and what if they hate it. Ohh fuck it, I'll just go with Firm Y that is known for it b/c the fucker already knows the basics and likes it enough to practice in that area.
I'm training a junior attorney that we copped straight out of LS. And, it's been a real pain in the ass. My boss just says, "CC Special, you can help him right? Work with him." Fuck me. I can see that his eyes glaze over when I talk about various fed regs.
Edit: But if you don't know what the fuck you want to do, it's generally a safe bet to go with the highest rank firm that you can somewhat tolerate (e.g., location, etc.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34014219) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:55 PM Author: Histrionic base
Prestige firm does matter to a certain extent, but if you're looking at V10s, then you can prbly just pick anyone and be fine. You may want to focus on practice group/ranking, which will be more important once you look going inhouse. I know some firms do a rotation system, which kinda sets you back a bit.
Going in-house will depend a lot on experience and personality. I'd rather take someone from a lower ranked firm that has relevant experience and a decent personality than some douche with so-so experience from a V5.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012546) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:58 PM Author: irradiated avocado water buffalo
>>Should I just choose the most prestigious firm?
yes, unless one is known as a particular hellhole
>>Do firms like cravath or the other v5 firms provide associates with an easier time lateraling or going inhouse?
#5 v #6, no. there isnt some magical v5 cutuff.
v5 vs. shitty biglaw, yes.
>>Is there really any difference between firms in terms of the amount of work or responsiveness that's required?
all this will be heavily dependent on who you end up working for. absolutely no way to predict.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012564) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 10:27 PM Author: lemon floppy bbw digit ratio
NYC litigation ranking?
PW, DPW, &c?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34015400) |
|
|