Choosing Biglaw SA
| harsh arousing station black woman | 08/17/17 | | Puce up-to-no-good water buffalo | 08/17/17 | | harsh arousing station black woman | 08/17/17 | | Puce up-to-no-good water buffalo | 08/17/17 | | Hairraiser base | 08/17/17 | | medicated shivering space | 08/17/17 | | Puce up-to-no-good water buffalo | 08/17/17 | | Hairraiser base | 08/17/17 | | medicated shivering space | 08/17/17 | | Wonderful box office | 08/17/17 | | medicated shivering space | 08/17/17 | | Wonderful box office | 08/17/17 | | medicated shivering space | 08/17/17 | | Wonderful box office | 08/17/17 | | Hairraiser base | 08/17/17 | | medicated shivering space | 08/17/17 | | Hairraiser base | 08/17/17 | | medicated shivering space | 08/17/17 | | bossy cobalt dragon theatre | 08/17/17 | | diverse home | 08/17/17 | | effete soul-stirring spot | 08/17/17 | | diverse home | 08/17/17 | | Wonderful box office | 08/17/17 | | medicated shivering space | 08/17/17 | | glittery crotch library | 08/17/17 | | medicated shivering space | 08/17/17 | | harsh arousing station black woman | 08/17/17 | | glittery crotch library | 08/17/17 | | curious wild heaven skinny woman | 08/17/17 | | Sexy international law enforcement agency | 08/17/17 | | anal public bath rigor | 08/17/17 | | Spectacular Tanning Salon Voyeur | 08/17/17 | | harsh arousing station black woman | 08/17/17 | | anal public bath rigor | 08/17/17 | | harsh arousing station black woman | 08/17/17 | | anal public bath rigor | 08/17/17 | | Crimson trip point fanboi | 08/17/17 | | harsh arousing station black woman | 08/17/17 | | diverse home | 08/17/17 | | smoky nursing home | 08/17/17 | | harsh arousing station black woman | 08/17/17 | | bossy cobalt dragon theatre | 08/17/17 | | harsh arousing station black woman | 08/19/17 | | Fishy titillating affirmative action | 08/17/17 | | Sickened Insanely Creepy School Cafeteria | 08/17/17 | | medicated shivering space | 08/17/17 | | Laughsome Ruby Jap | 08/17/17 | | medicated shivering space | 08/17/17 | | Laughsome Ruby Jap | 08/17/17 | | medicated shivering space | 08/17/17 | | Laughsome Ruby Jap | 08/17/17 | | beady-eyed snowy doctorate | 08/17/17 | | medicated shivering space | 08/17/17 | | beady-eyed snowy doctorate | 08/17/17 | | Fishy titillating affirmative action | 08/17/17 | | Sickened Insanely Creepy School Cafeteria | 08/17/17 | | Laughsome Ruby Jap | 08/17/17 | | Sickened Insanely Creepy School Cafeteria | 08/17/17 | | Laughsome Ruby Jap | 08/17/17 | | Sickened Insanely Creepy School Cafeteria | 08/17/17 | | Laughsome Ruby Jap | 08/17/17 | | Sickened Insanely Creepy School Cafeteria | 08/17/17 | | Rebellious sound barrier rehab | 08/17/17 | | Fishy titillating affirmative action | 08/17/17 | | Sickened Insanely Creepy School Cafeteria | 08/17/17 | | Fishy titillating affirmative action | 08/17/17 | | Rebellious sound barrier rehab | 08/17/17 | | bossy cobalt dragon theatre | 08/17/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: August 17th, 2017 7:56 PM Author: Wonderful box office
You can get equal experience at the firms, but what Nutella is talking about is that for in-house you're normally interviewing for a specialized area (not some general corporate position) so your firm's prestige/reputation w/r/t that specialized area is important, i.e., specialized area >>> vault ranking when interviewing for inhouse. So, like, you've probably never heard of Seward & Kissel, but if you're doing fund work they are about as good as any other shop.
Once you go in-house, attorneys don't want to train someone from the ground up. Sure, there is some leeway, but not much. They'll figure, shit I can get a K&E associate but then I'd have to train them to do X type of work, and what if they hate it. Ohh fuck it, I'll just go with Firm Y that is known for it b/c the fucker already knows the basics and likes it enough to practice in that area.
I'm training a junior attorney that we copped straight out of LS. And, it's been a real pain in the ass. My boss just says, "CC Special, you can help him right? Work with him." Fuck me. I can see that his eyes glaze over when I talk about various fed regs.
Edit: But if you don't know what the fuck you want to do, it's generally a safe bet to go with the highest rank firm that you can somewhat tolerate (e.g., location, etc.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34014219) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:55 PM Author: Wonderful box office
Prestige firm does matter to a certain extent, but if you're looking at V10s, then you can prbly just pick anyone and be fine. You may want to focus on practice group/ranking, which will be more important once you look going inhouse. I know some firms do a rotation system, which kinda sets you back a bit.
Going in-house will depend a lot on experience and personality. I'd rather take someone from a lower ranked firm that has relevant experience and a decent personality than some douche with so-so experience from a V5.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012546) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:58 PM Author: medicated shivering space
>>Should I just choose the most prestigious firm?
yes, unless one is known as a particular hellhole
>>Do firms like cravath or the other v5 firms provide associates with an easier time lateraling or going inhouse?
#5 v #6, no. there isnt some magical v5 cutuff.
v5 vs. shitty biglaw, yes.
>>Is there really any difference between firms in terms of the amount of work or responsiveness that's required?
all this will be heavily dependent on who you end up working for. absolutely no way to predict.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012564) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 10:27 PM Author: Rebellious sound barrier rehab
NYC litigation ranking?
PW, DPW, &c?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34015400) |
|
|