Choosing Biglaw SA
| misunderstood adventurous dilemma knife | 08/17/17 | | magenta out-of-control senate elastic band | 08/17/17 | | misunderstood adventurous dilemma knife | 08/17/17 | | magenta out-of-control senate elastic band | 08/17/17 | | Laughsome sexy stage newt | 08/17/17 | | kink-friendly yellow casino | 08/17/17 | | magenta out-of-control senate elastic band | 08/17/17 | | Laughsome sexy stage newt | 08/17/17 | | kink-friendly yellow casino | 08/17/17 | | Ruddy plaza | 08/17/17 | | kink-friendly yellow casino | 08/17/17 | | Ruddy plaza | 08/17/17 | | kink-friendly yellow casino | 08/17/17 | | Ruddy plaza | 08/17/17 | | Laughsome sexy stage newt | 08/17/17 | | kink-friendly yellow casino | 08/17/17 | | Laughsome sexy stage newt | 08/17/17 | | kink-friendly yellow casino | 08/17/17 | | French azn hall | 08/17/17 | | Beady-eyed Tank | 08/17/17 | | multi-colored rough-skinned prole | 08/17/17 | | Beady-eyed Tank | 08/17/17 | | Ruddy plaza | 08/17/17 | | kink-friendly yellow casino | 08/17/17 | | histrionic dysfunction double fault | 08/17/17 | | kink-friendly yellow casino | 08/17/17 | | misunderstood adventurous dilemma knife | 08/17/17 | | histrionic dysfunction double fault | 08/17/17 | | supple skinny woman | 08/17/17 | | twisted crystalline location | 08/17/17 | | Bistre House-broken Address | 08/17/17 | | irate flushed famous landscape painting | 08/17/17 | | misunderstood adventurous dilemma knife | 08/17/17 | | Bistre House-broken Address | 08/17/17 | | misunderstood adventurous dilemma knife | 08/17/17 | | Bistre House-broken Address | 08/17/17 | | stimulating new version orchestra pit | 08/17/17 | | misunderstood adventurous dilemma knife | 08/17/17 | | Beady-eyed Tank | 08/17/17 | | Drunken Blathering Sound Barrier | 08/17/17 | | misunderstood adventurous dilemma knife | 08/17/17 | | French azn hall | 08/17/17 | | misunderstood adventurous dilemma knife | 08/19/17 | | twinkling school cafeteria | 08/17/17 | | Marvelous anal spot toaster | 08/17/17 | | kink-friendly yellow casino | 08/17/17 | | Citrine area legend | 08/17/17 | | kink-friendly yellow casino | 08/17/17 | | Citrine area legend | 08/17/17 | | kink-friendly yellow casino | 08/17/17 | | Citrine area legend | 08/17/17 | | violent station persian | 08/17/17 | | kink-friendly yellow casino | 08/17/17 | | violent station persian | 08/17/17 | | twinkling school cafeteria | 08/17/17 | | Marvelous anal spot toaster | 08/17/17 | | Citrine area legend | 08/17/17 | | Marvelous anal spot toaster | 08/17/17 | | Citrine area legend | 08/17/17 | | Marvelous anal spot toaster | 08/17/17 | | Citrine area legend | 08/17/17 | | Marvelous anal spot toaster | 08/17/17 | | sienna mewling space idiot | 08/17/17 | | twinkling school cafeteria | 08/17/17 | | Marvelous anal spot toaster | 08/17/17 | | twinkling school cafeteria | 08/17/17 | | sienna mewling space idiot | 08/17/17 | | French azn hall | 08/17/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: August 17th, 2017 7:56 PM Author: Ruddy plaza
You can get equal experience at the firms, but what Nutella is talking about is that for in-house you're normally interviewing for a specialized area (not some general corporate position) so your firm's prestige/reputation w/r/t that specialized area is important, i.e., specialized area >>> vault ranking when interviewing for inhouse. So, like, you've probably never heard of Seward & Kissel, but if you're doing fund work they are about as good as any other shop.
Once you go in-house, attorneys don't want to train someone from the ground up. Sure, there is some leeway, but not much. They'll figure, shit I can get a K&E associate but then I'd have to train them to do X type of work, and what if they hate it. Ohh fuck it, I'll just go with Firm Y that is known for it b/c the fucker already knows the basics and likes it enough to practice in that area.
I'm training a junior attorney that we copped straight out of LS. And, it's been a real pain in the ass. My boss just says, "CC Special, you can help him right? Work with him." Fuck me. I can see that his eyes glaze over when I talk about various fed regs.
Edit: But if you don't know what the fuck you want to do, it's generally a safe bet to go with the highest rank firm that you can somewhat tolerate (e.g., location, etc.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34014219) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:55 PM Author: Ruddy plaza
Prestige firm does matter to a certain extent, but if you're looking at V10s, then you can prbly just pick anyone and be fine. You may want to focus on practice group/ranking, which will be more important once you look going inhouse. I know some firms do a rotation system, which kinda sets you back a bit.
Going in-house will depend a lot on experience and personality. I'd rather take someone from a lower ranked firm that has relevant experience and a decent personality than some douche with so-so experience from a V5.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012546) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 3:58 PM Author: kink-friendly yellow casino
>>Should I just choose the most prestigious firm?
yes, unless one is known as a particular hellhole
>>Do firms like cravath or the other v5 firms provide associates with an easier time lateraling or going inhouse?
#5 v #6, no. there isnt some magical v5 cutuff.
v5 vs. shitty biglaw, yes.
>>Is there really any difference between firms in terms of the amount of work or responsiveness that's required?
all this will be heavily dependent on who you end up working for. absolutely no way to predict.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34012564) |
Date: August 17th, 2017 10:27 PM Author: sienna mewling space idiot
NYC litigation ranking?
PW, DPW, &c?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3704162&forum_id=2#34015400) |
|
|