The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
5'10" is the most aesthetic height for a man, and is preferred by women
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:01 PM Author: Bespoke Set (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408764) |
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:01 PM Author: motley potus (Ironside) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408768) |
 |
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:02 PM Author: red whorehouse lol wtf? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408778) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:04 PM Author: motley potus Thought you're 5'10"?
*gives you secret handshake* |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:05 PM Author: aromatic lavender athletic conference That's what he claims on xo so he's really closer to 5'5" lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408799) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:05 PM Author: red whorehouse I am, but this isn't really a thread I'd make. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408802) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:32 PM Author: arousing menage you're 5'10?
it all makes sense! |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:36 PM Author: red whorehouse ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34409035) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:36 PM Author: arousing menage no I just remember you once saying you prefer shorter girls because you can throw them around in bed and stuff (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34409042) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:38 PM Author: red whorehouse i do, but they don't need to be like 5'0" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34409048) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:05 PM Author: aromatic lavender athletic conference (5'6" manlet pretending to be 5'10") (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408796) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:06 PM Author: red whorehouse (guy confusing Mark Ironside tp with Mark Ironside) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408807) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:13 PM Author: aromatic lavender athletic conference (gay midget) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408848) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:01 PM Author: frum tanning salon milk cope (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408769) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:01 PM Author: Laughsome Tantric Lodge Mad-dog Skullcap not if you're skinny (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408773) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:02 PM Author: infuriating state hominid by "women", i assume you mean dominant homosexual men (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408777) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:03 PM Author: exhilarant field (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408784) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:03 PM Author: Mind-boggling Senate Giraffe (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408786) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:04 PM Author: Bespoke Set brad pitt is 5'10" and he was considered perfect (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408793) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:06 PM Author: infuriating state hominid (((yeah let's just trust hollywood on this))) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408809) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:07 PM Author: Mind-boggling Senate Giraffe (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408816) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:17 PM Author: floppy hospital Odd case: Brad Pitt's big break came playing Geena Davis's lover in Thelma and Louise. Geena Davis is 6'0.
http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/geena-davis-brad-pitt-juliette-lewis-picture-id110522007 |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:04 PM Author: arousing menage lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408787) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:06 PM Author: infuriating state hominid (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408805) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:37 PM Author: vigorous fear-inspiring bawdyhouse nowag (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411050) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:11 PM Author: costumed cheese-eating temple corn cake (African Pygmy tribeswoman) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408831) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:11 PM Author: Concupiscible indecent mediation No (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408837) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:19 PM Author: Sinister Topaz Weed Whacker read this as "pathetic." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34408897) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:30 PM Author: Bespoke Set xo is apparently full of gangly tall awkward unaesthetic hater dorks (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34409002) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:35 PM Author: pearl parlour it's certainly in the range. 5'10" to 6'2" is about right. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34409029) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:36 PM Author: arousing menage 6'2 to 6'4
I like even taller, like 6'5, 6'6 but I recognize that's too big for most women. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:37 PM Author: red whorehouse (low iq shtick) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34409044) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:38 PM Author: pearl parlour a lot less room for error, aesthetically speaking, past 6'2". you really need to be in shape. otherwise you're weird and lanky or too big and slovenly. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34409049) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 1:39 PM Author: red whorehouse bingo.
no homo, but i've always found 6-6'2" to be the most aesthetic height for guys. right around that 85-90th percentile. if i were going to choose my height it would be in that range
more than that and the aesthetics get out of whack. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:29 PM Author: fragrant hot azn no
The about right range is 6'0" to 6'4". |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:33 PM Author: Haunting Ruby Sanctuary so you would find conan obrien at six foot four inches to be manlier and cooler than the mma fighter mike perry who is five foot ten inches and looks like a greek god? nigga plz.
height is just a number. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:35 PM Author: Charcoal arrogant mood all of the women here date skinnyfat jew autist nerds and call them chads on the internet (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411025) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:36 PM Author: Haunting Ruby Sanctuary why did you just insult me?
we cant all be arnold with the face of brad pitt.
|
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:38 PM Author: Charcoal arrogant mood im insulting the women here
have you seen their pics? it's all fatasses with hairy assholes. literally NO ONE on this website is even REMOTELY good looking except Luis and MAYBE Peterman. this is a haven for ugly, autistic losers. fuck everyone here. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:38 PM Author: Concupiscible indecent mediation *except luis (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411063) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:48 PM Author: arousing menage you try way too hard (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411138) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:48 PM Author: Charcoal arrogant mood you don't work out enough and we have the pics to prove it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411142) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:41 PM Author: fragrant hot azn Just google imaged Mike Perry. I think you have me mistaken for prole trash. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411085) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:44 PM Author: Haunting Ruby Sanctuary lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411112) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:30 PM Author: fragrant hot azn No and no (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34410993) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:08 PM Author: Zippy titillating spot Said this several times on here b/f, but I can tell you for a fact that 29hillary does not push above a 6.5/7 in looks, if that high. Only above the median, but still looks insecure chicks height whore like this.
I am 100% in agreement that 6'0-6'2" is ideal for aesthetics and athletics, however, I can assure you I will take a 5'9" young Matt Hughes thick neck, chiseled jawline, and explosive, athletic body over a regular 6'3" any day. If you don't think 8++ pussy spreads for that look, you have never had it. Prole pussy, Hooters pussy, just amazing dumb, vodka promo girl in the nightclub pussy. This is the measurement for being fine, not some fucking busted shrew. A 6'2" Matt Hughes might be a 10% to 15% improvement in stud factor, but that would be an incrediblely rare bro.
I was sorta study buds with a shrew in UG that was always talking about how she liked big guys (read obese). The chick was skinny but had busted, acne face and was not fine generally. She would always talk shit on how she wanted to be the boss after college of the rich, good looking bros who ignored her.
All things being equal, 6'0-6'2 is ideal. It scales better percentages at the lower end. If you are an average/below average 5'9, being 6'1 might improve you 30-40%. If you are a very high end 5'9, being 6'1 might improve you 10-15%. But the overall point is, if you are a higher end shortmo, go for the type of chicks that are fine enough to have 10 reasons to reject ANY bro. Lots of guys like this will go after average chicks because they feel like they have a shot, when the reality is, those chicks are insecure abt their own looks and inwardly know they are awkward. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:10 PM Author: arousing menage Nah all girls height whore, hot girls probably even moreso
are you short? there's this guy who goes around saying 29 must be unattractive and awkward because she likes tall guys so much.
oh and most women don't care that much about a guy being jacked. that's mostly to impress other men. girls would take a tall regular guy over a 5'9 guy with a perfect body. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:17 PM Author: Brindle windowlicker national jfc trigger warning for shortmos (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411363) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:25 PM Author: Zippy titillating spot GTFO with that shit, most definitely I am short, and old and married now. But I have done everything from picking up chicks at 4PM at Outback on a Tuesday and rawdogged them within the hour. Numerous ONS from clubs (most hight intensive enviro possible). Numerous solo pickup and one night fucks. Never fucked without the chick wanting to see me again, etc. From age 17-35, I got IOI's from chicks every fucking place I went. This only slowed when I got over 40. I donno WTF you are talking abt you junkie whore. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411429) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:27 PM Author: arousing menage I'm happy for you (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411443) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:47 PM Author: Twisted offensive filthpig You're both right. BS is right that short men aren't really men and nobody, whether male or female, takes them seriously.
SWC is right that 29tp isn't attractive at all. She got drunk and poasted a pic once and, well ... 'twas not good. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 7:41 PM Author: Zippy titillating spot LOL. I wish one of the 'men' in my social circle or yours would not take me seriously. This is me last year at 42 and now at 43, fat after years of my wife's cooking and more athletic surgeries and injuries than you can imagine. Never took PEDS, and don't do 'pump' type of non athletic lifts. Just swim, box and chin. LOL and you fake ass weak motherfuckers. I am still strong as fuck and do 8 3min/1min rest rounds on the heavy bag no problem throwing 100+ punches with 16oz gloves. LOL that one of you ugly bitches would deny my cock when I was 28 with thick, greasy hair and still had time to seriously train. 5'7".
One of you fucking with me would resolve itself similar to Ray Rice's bitch fucking with him.
https://imgur.com/a/CI5Qr |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 7:43 PM Author: Brindle windowlicker national what the fuck (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34412033) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 8:20 PM Author: multi-colored mentally impaired box office main people lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34412295) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 8:49 PM Author: Twisted offensive filthpig *rests my elbow on ur head* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34412513) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 9:02 PM Author: Zippy titillating spot Ha u better be stroking my cock with your free hand. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34412620) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:31 PM Author: Charcoal arrogant mood The absolutely most objectively handsome men in terms of combined bodily and facial aesthetics are 5'11" and 6'. Aside from that you get either stocky, disproportioned midgets or apish oafs with bizarre features. The most attractive celebrities, who have a REPUTATION of being extremely attractive, are one of these two heights. Once you get to 5'10" or 6'1" you start getting ugly, out of proportion, and generally dorky. True and formal male aesthetics can only exist in this range. Even then, it's patreo efficient at 80% being 6' and 20% being 5'11". My opinion counts the most in this thread because I am profoundly attractive and bisexual. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411003) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:42 PM Author: Marvelous hell codepig This is about right . 5'9-6'1 is the acceptable range, with maybe 5'10 or 5'11at the ideal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411097) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:49 PM Author: fragrant hot azn How tall are you Julia? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411149) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:15 PM Author: Galvanic Digit Ratio Affirmative Action 4 10 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411350) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:38 PM Author: fragrant hot azn lol
I think she's around 5'4". That's my vague recollection. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:46 PM Author: Galvanic Digit Ratio Affirmative Action With 5 inch heels, yeah (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411593) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:34 PM Author: Concupiscible indecent mediation ITT: a bunch of dudes try to tell women what they like
this is just as goofy as when julia tries to tell the men of xoxo that exotic looking women are preferred over all-american blondes
women like guys in the 6 foot to 6 4 range. personally i like them 6 2 or 6 3
/end thread |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:38 PM Author: Haunting Ruby Sanctuary yeah, conan obrien is so sexy omg. women get wet all over when they see him. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411066) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:42 PM Author: fragrant hot azn /end thread (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411094) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:47 PM Author: red whorehouse you're missing the point of the thread, at least as we are discussing it.
there is definitely a narrow band where height is most aesthetic on a guy. that doesn't mean that all guys taller or shorter than that look bad, nor that all guys within that band look good, but that aesthetics are maximized within that band. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:51 PM Author: arousing menage jcm's point was that it's not for men to say what that range is (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411160) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:54 PM Author: fragrant hot azn cr
|
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:56 PM Author: red whorehouse not a good point though, because women are evaluating men holistically.
for example, JCM is tall, so she prefers a tall guy because she is tall. and i'll bet that when she's evaluating how men look, she is placing a premium on height rather than evaluating all men and figuring out which heights lead to the most aesthetic looks at the margins.
i am neither 6' nor 6'6 nor 5'6, but i can tell you pretty clearly which height ends up creating the most aesthetic look at the margins. likewise i can also say that girls tend to look more aesthetically pleasing at the margins at a height taller than the height i normally prefer for a significant other. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:58 PM Author: Concupiscible indecent mediation lulz, the funny thing is that im the least height-focused regular fempoaster. im a tad under 5 9 and 3 out of 4 of my serious LTRs were with dudes under 6 feet
height honestly isnt that important to me
that being said, the men that are the most attractive to women are between 6 and 6 4 |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:59 PM Author: arousing menage JCM prefers tall men because she's a woman
29 is like 5'6
regardless, we are women so we are better able to judge what women find attractive, which is what we're arguing about. this isn't a discussion of what is aesthetically pleasing in an asexual way, I don't think. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:03 PM Author: red whorehouse sigh (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411241) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:21 PM Author: aromatic lavender athletic conference Lol Ironside you're a fucking fag bro (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411391) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:11 PM Author: Slate Vibrant Market Genital Piercing Jews at Hollywood subliminally convinced JCM what the ideal range is.
Just like Chinese girls in China got subliminally convince by the state media that the ideal high is 5'9".
|
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:16 PM Author: Concupiscible indecent mediation its a jewish conspiracy!
that being said, im personally fine w dating whoever as long as they arent shorter than me. im just saying what women find most attractive in general in my experience. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:49 PM Author: arousing menage yea xo guys are really hypocritical when it comes to discussions of male looks
they get really angry when Julia tries to argue with them over female hotness but then they do the same thing |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:50 PM Author: red whorehouse i think julia is right about a lot of things.
and julia gets a lot of hate on here, but she does approach her view of both sexes from an aesthetic angle. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:53 PM Author: Concupiscible indecent mediation I think julia is great, i just disagree w some of the things she says when she comments in those threads (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411179) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:54 PM Author: Haunting Ruby Sanctuary julia is on our side today. deal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411186) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:52 PM Author: fragrant hot azn It's one of the biggest sore spots for some xo male poasters: the concept that women might have preferences for physical attributes that they can't change.
They react by arguing with us about what we like.
|
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:55 PM Author: Concupiscible indecent mediation It would be like us arguing w dudes about the fact that they prefer natural blondes w a certain hip to waist ratio and perky tits (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411192) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:08 PM Author: fragrant hot azn Exactly. Unless what they are contending for is really bizarre and against my experience who am I to argue with what they say they like?
When it comes to height not only do most women express strong preferences they give effect to them by their choices.
Otherwise tall girl/shorter guy couples wouldn't be so rare. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:19 PM Author: arousing menage yeah I'm only so adamant about the height thing because EVERY woman I have discussed it with (aside from Julia) expressed a preference for very tall men. it's not even about my own preferences. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411373) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:22 PM Author: Concupiscible indecent mediation i dont really care about height as long as the dude is my height or taller, but id prefer a tall guy if given the choice. i just dont care enough about it to ding dudes for it
i would say 90%+ of females prefer tall doodz, just like 90%+ of men prefer toned, fit women with natural curve and perky tits. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:38 PM Author: fragrant hot azn I come from a tall family, I used to play a sport (basketball) that was full of tall guys and I unabashedly find tall guys attractive. So I'm used to being in tall guy company.
Nor did I have any problems finding tall guys wanting to date me so it wasn't like I was making any sort of major dent in my dating pool by indulging my height preference.
Ultimately people like what they like and no amount of complaining about it is going to change their minds. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:40 PM Author: arousing menage what is your history with that dude who insists you must be average and autistic because you like tall guys so much? I have seen him go after you more than once. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411538) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:55 PM Author: fragrant hot azn I have no clue who he is but TBF I am bad at tracking moniker changes via poasting style.
If someone wants to go to that length of writing poasts like that just so they can run some complicated theory that justifies them insinuating I'm ugly or insecure about my looks then there's nothing I can do about it, it doesn't change my reality. Water off this duck's back.
|
|
Date: October 11th, 2017 10:38 AM Author: red whorehouse I feel like I'm in the twilight zone reading some of the comments by the women ITT.
Nobody is talking about personal preferences. Nor are they raging about the fact that height is an unchangeable characteristic. We're all discussing what height maximizes aesthetic value. I mean shit, it's not like I'm going all bluesmoke and trolling for myself ITT; I specifically said above that a height 2-4 inches above mine is much more aesthetic. It's just that *really* tall tends to work against most guys -- yes some super tall guys can look good, but it is much harder to pull off, even if a few of the fempoasters like guys who are 6'5".
And it works the same way with women. I think aesthetically women tend to look best overall in that 5'4-5'7" range, even if I personally prefer 5'2-5'4" as my desired range. And once women are 5'9"+ it gets hard for them to maximize aesthetics. Yes some look good, but many don't. The margin for error is slim.
Another example to illustrate this is tit size. Yes, I tend to like bigger tits, but the larger those tits get the more specific a chick's body has to be for those same large tits to look good. In fact, one of the reasons why I prefer fake tits is precisely because even though I like large tits, many larger natural tits do not maximize aesthetic value. You might be surprised to know that I consider large B/small C to generally be the overall most aesthetic natural tit size. Even though I'd personally prefer a perfect DD cup, that's in a vacuum, and I'd never say that DD-cup natural tits maximize aesthetic value, even if it's my preference. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:04 PM Author: Charcoal arrogant mood (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411249) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:37 PM Author: Marvelous hell codepig Absolutely credited
Under 5'8 is too short and effeminate; over 6'0 you look either gangly or like a grotesque brute. 5'10 is the sweet spot. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:41 PM Author: Haunting Ruby Sanctuary frank zane agrees with you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Olympia#/media/File:Frank_Zane.jpg
although to be fair, you CAN look asthetic at six foot four, even. but over that, its basically impossible. its all about how you look.
tom cruise is only five foot eight, and he looks good, too. but yeah less than that is too short, and over six foot four is too tall, imo. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:48 PM Author: motley potus *pulls barstool up close* *struggles to hop on* *voice cracks as I order you a drink* |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:59 PM Author: Canary keepsake machete (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411676) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:33 PM Author: fragrant hot azn I think it depends a lot on your own height though to be sure there are plenty of petite girls who don't just have a relative height preference but also a strong absolute height preference.
So from my own 5'7" perspective 5'8" is really short, 5'10" is shortish and 6' is good, with 6'2" plus being ideal.
|
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 9:02 PM Author: Brilliant Selfie Property Over 6'0 is grotesque? You are consistently wrong about everything. How do you do it? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34412621) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:40 PM Author: lascivious stag film https://i.imgur.com/pQJK8KR.jpg (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411075) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:41 PM Author: Concupiscible indecent mediation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411083) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:44 PM Author: Doobsian meetinghouse coffee pot Where do you even find these? How do you have one for every xo meme? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411113) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:45 PM Author: lascivious stag film They're all over the place. Here's one showing how ugly girls get ignored by Chad:
http://i.imgur.com/EBU6Eym.jpg |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:57 PM Author: arousing menage that ones silly because guys will fuck anything (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411206) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:57 PM Author: lascivious stag film Stacey is always their first choice (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411209) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:01 PM Author: arousing menage yea but there aren't enough Stacey's to go around for every horny Chad on the planet (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411228) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:58 PM Author: Haunting Ruby Sanctuary i used to fuck all the pillows in my house when i was 12. just throwing that our there.
shit, now that i think of it, i even fucked the main door. that was odd. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:10 PM Author: fragrant hot azn To a point. But if the protagonist in that cartoon is not hot and there's a hot Stacey standing nearby then no woman in the world is going to be surprised that Chad prefers Stacey. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411292) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 5:48 PM Author: fragrant hot azn Should have got the Russian doctors to give him a chin while he was there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411137) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 7:01 PM Author: Canary keepsake machete (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411692) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 8:52 PM Author: chrome step-uncle's house (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34412536) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:13 PM Author: Exciting cyan chapel rigpig Keep telling yourself that shortmos lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411329) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:53 PM Author: orange domesticated plaza striped hyena this is like the xo funnybone of flame (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34411644) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 6:59 PM Author: fragrant hot azn This is why it has its own Scholarship sub-bort.
It's a subject some male poasters never seem to tire of arguing with us about. |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 8:55 PM Author: chrome step-uncle's house LMAO at the variety of mental illness ITT. Guys, you do as well with women as you do. Convincing or failing to convince XO incels isn't going to help or hurt you. What exactly is the point of threads like this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34412570) |
|
Date: October 10th, 2017 9:01 PM Author: Brilliant Selfie Property (5'0" foot man) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34412608) |
|
Date: October 11th, 2017 10:43 AM Author: useless hairy legs internal respiration all I know is I can see everyone's hair from up here and you aren't as sexy as you seem to think you are... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3759677&forum_id=2#34415793) |