http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/31/progressive-parents-now-throwing-gender-declaration-parties-for-teenage-children/

SPRINGFIELD, Mass.- Move over, carbon-neutral birthday parties. There’s a new popular way to celebrate for the country’s trendy progressive families: Gender declaration parties for teenage children.

The new phenomenon is a natural outgrowth of one of the latest trends in progressive parenting: Intentionally obscuring the gender of one’s children. Parents, frustrated by a society where people are declared “boys” or “girls” simply because they have penises or vaginas, are fighting back by opting out entirely and waiting until children have grown wise enough to choose a gender for themselves. Typically, this point is reached when a child is able to complete Algebra II, and it is accompanied by a big party comparable to bar mitzvahs or high school graduation parties.

Like other progressive parents, Bryce and Priscilla Hawkins-Hart of Springfield, Mass. did everything they could to keep their “penis-child” Taylor from being pressured into one gender or another. In addition to Taylor’s androgynous name, they insisted on using the gender-neutral pronoun zhe, painted zher room a monochrome grey, and forced zhim to play with both dolls and toy trucks while growing up.

“I remember when the doctor told me ‘It’s a boy!'” Bryce told The Daily Caller. “I just said to him, ‘Well, we’ll see about that!’ Then, I reported that doctor for child abuse for trying to force a gender onto young children.”

Now, 15 years later, little Taylor Hawkins-Hart is finally ready to declare zher true gender, and Bryce and Priscilla are planning a big party.

“Everybody in Taylor’s family that hasn’t disassociated with us is coming,” Priscilla said. In order to be ready for all contingencies, the family has purchased 17 different gluten-free, gender-themed cakes, in case Taylor chooses a gender identity such as two-spirit or genderqueer. If Taylor announces a desire to undergo any kind of sex reassignment surgery, a surgeon will be on hand to perform the procedure then and there, in front of everybody.

“Some might say that’s too much,” Priscilla added. “But I say nothing is too much for our little child of indeterminate gender.”

One of Taylor’s friends, @rin Wong-Cohen, had a gender declaration party of his own four months ago and announced he was a male. Taylor’s parents didn’t allow zhim to attend, as they didn’t want zhim feeling peer pressure one way or another.

“It was a blast,” @rin said. “But I think my mom took it badly. She grabbed me and kept asking if I was sure that my dad didn’t tell me what to say.”

With the profusion of parties has come some new lingo. Parties for a newly-announced boy have informally been dubbed “peenceañeras,” while parties for a girl are often called “vag mitzvahs.”

But many are unhappy with those terms, including the Hawkins-Harts.

“Calling a party for a girl a ‘vag mitzvah’ just perpetuates the notion that girls should have vaginas,” said Priscilla. “But that’s just an offensive stereotype. Plenty of girls have penises. I think Taylor is going to be one of those girls.” (RELATED: UCLA Paper Apologizes For Saying Women Menstruate)

Bryce says he has no idea which gender Taylor is going to settle on.

“Zhe really likes playing football and ‘Call of Duty,’ and zhe recently started dating a vagina-person in zher Spanish class,” he said. “But since those are perfectly neutral activities that can’t be associated with any gender, they don’t really give me a hint which way Taylor is leaning.”

Taylor seems undecided as well.

“I’m a boy. My parents are insane. Please help me,” Taylor told The Caller.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770073&forum_id=2#34490925)

pretty sure xo coined the gender reveal / penis child meme

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770073&forum_id=2#34490933)

this was years ago

ljl

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770073&forum_id=2#34490946)

http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/18/a-scene-from-the-coming-diversity-wars/

General Staff Building, Western Military District Headquarters, St. Petersburg, Russia

9:34 PM, Sept. 19, 2036. The Darkest Days of World War 3

*a young cismale officer bursts into the war room*

Lt. Sergei Ivanov: General! Terrible news from the front!

Gen. Mikhail Petrov: What do you mean, Lieutenant?

Ivanov: The Americans … they’re sending their most diverse units to attack Smolensk!

Petrov: Just … just how diverse do you mean?

Ivanov: It’s the Fourth Marine Division … the Fighting Jenners. Astonishingly, they’re almost equally split between blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and American Indians.

Petrov: Terrible news … but we’ve held off racially balanced units before. As long as they’re still mostly straight men …

Ivanov [interrupting]: That’s not all commander. They’re 75 percent women. 30 percent identify as gay, 12 percent as bisexual, 7 percent as assorted queer sexualities.

Petrov: My God … Trannies?

Ivanov: Two whole rifle companies. Crack troops. Best of the best.

Petrov: Blyad! Prepare to evacuate to Moscow. We cannot hope to contain such a strong enemy with our regular white, cishet divisions.

Ivanov: Wait, commander! We shouldn’t give up yet, we mustn’t give up!

Petrov: You’re a good soldier, Ivanov, but you need to know defeat when you see it. Ray Mabus caused a military revolution when he discovered the strength-multiplying effects of diversity within a military force. And it’s not just raw strength, either. Diversity made the Americans more innovative too, Mabus discovered. Their weapons and tactics have never been more advanced relative to ours. We’re seeing the fruits of Mabus’ brilliant discovery now. Vladivostok, Murmansk, Rostov, they all have the rainbow flag flying over them now because of the diversity principle.

Ivanov: But sir! We could still counterattack! If the enemy force is 75 percent women, then maybe we can hit them when all of their menstrual cycles are lined up. They’ll be too cramped and bloated to fight back!

Petrov: Watch your language, lieutenant. Not all women menstruate, and not all those who menstruate are women. We can’t assume anything.

Ivanov: I’m sorry, sir. Is … is there any hope?

Petrov: At this point, I’m afraid not. We should have accepted President Malia Obama’s ultimatum to legalize gay marriage and recognize all 17 genders while we had the chance.

Ivanov: Wait, sir! I have another idea. It’s not too late to adopt the Americans’ military doctrine. We could start identifying as trans* as well!

Petrov: By God, Ivanov, you’re a genius! Fetch some scalpels from the surgeon’s tent, and tell Col. Kozak to requisition the supply of hormones we captured from the French at Kursk. Send a message to Moscow and tell them we need to concentrate every racial and ethnic studies professor we have in Smolensk, so we can make our forces there as transracial as possible. We’ll lick those Americans yet!

That night, Gen. Mikhail Petrov re-identified herself as Sofiya Jackson, a black trans* woman of size, and led her newly diversified soldiers into the decisive battle at Smolensk. While Jackson fell in the battle, she did so having given birth to a new, more diverse Russian army, one that could battle the Americans on an equal footing. The war, so close to ending in an easy American victory, would continue for many years to come… but that is a story for another time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770073&forum_id=2#34490950)

http://dailycaller.com/2015/12/05/7-other-great-workplace-disputes-in-history/

The shooting at the San Bernardino center for the disabled has focused public attention on the pressing issue of workplace violence. Some have suggested Tashfeen Malik and Syed Rizwan Farook may be terrorists, based on their use of explosives and heavy weapons, their links to Islamic extremism, and Malik’s pledge of allegiance to ISIS. But others have cited a feud in the office as the real reason for Wednesday’s attack, making this massacre of 14 people a simple episode of workplace violence, and certainly not an indictment of radical Islam.

With that in mind, The Daily Caller News Foundation looks at seven other infamous outbreaks of workplace violence throughout history.

1. The American Revolutionary Spinoff Argument

George Washington, a regional manager for the British Empire upset about his lack of input into wider corporate operations, pulled off an office coup which saw the United States subsidiary spun off as an independent entity. This workplace feud was highlighted by the outside role played by FranceCo., which helped bankroll Washington’s efforts in an effort to weaken their business rival.

One of the great heroes of the spinoff fight was Nathan Hale, who famously declared “I only regret that I have but one career to lose for my company.”

2. The American Civil Workplace Dispute

One of the bloodiest examples on this list, as over 600,000 people died in a lengthy office argument over U.S. government labor policies. Union general William Tecumseh Sherman, whose faction favored a pay increase for low-level employees, summed up the horrors of the period when he declared “Workplace violence is hell.”

3. Fort Hood

Nidal Malik Hasan was observed crying “Allahu Akbar!” as he rampaged through Fort Hood, slaying 13 of his co-workers. The meaning of this phrase is unclear, but may be a coded protest against workplace discrimination or price hikes at the local commissary.

4. 9/11

A fruitful working relationship between Osama bin Laden and the U.S. government in the 1980s ended in a messy breakup after bin Laden’s contract wasn’t renewed. Bin Laden teamed up with several other disgruntled ex-employees in Afghanistan, where they masterminded the destruction of the World Trade Center to prove their worth. It was a lot like the ending of Office Space, really.

5. World Work Dispute II

Adolf Hitler, an embittered former painter, launched invasions of France, Poland, the Netherlands, and other countries, likely to get back at art critics who were unimpressed with his work and refused to buy it. Hitler was backed up by millions of German union workers who believed they got a raw deal in contract negotiations at Versailles 20 years before. More than 20 million employees died in what is likely the biggest instance of “going postal” in workplace history.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the world, a casual disagreement over oil contracts rapidly escalated out of control, as employees of Japan Industries responded by blowing up half of America’s shipping fleet.

6. Taiping Rebellion

This workplace incident is rather obscure in the West, but worthy of remembrance. Hong Xiuquan went insane after failing the entrance exam for the Chinese bureaucracy too many times, and concluded both that he was the younger brother of Jesus Christ and that he had a future in entrepreneurship. He attempted to found his own Chinese empire to compete with the Qing Dynasty monopoly. 20 million perished in this particularly vicious dispute.

7. Roman Republic Board of Directors Fight

Back in 49 B.C., RomanRepublic was the biggest company around, but it was in turmoil as Julius Caesar and Pompey the Great, both members of the board of directors, each sought to become CEO. Pompey had the backing of the board of directors, but Caesar had the company’s rank and file, and used them to violently take over most of the company’s offices until Pompey was finally murdered during a business trip to Egypt.

Caesar’s tenure as undisputed CEO didn’t last, though. Dissatisfied with Caesar’s leadership, several members of the board of directors conspired against him, and in a boardroom power play in 46 B.C. they successfully terminated his position, along with his life. A few years later, increasingly severe workplace disputes caused RomanRepublic collapsed entirely, to be replaced by its reincorporated successor RomanEmpire.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770073&forum_id=2#34490988)

http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/13/13-times-russian-hackers-sabotaged-clintons-presidential-campaign/

Many conservatives and Trump supporters have been dismissive of the possibility that interference by Russian hackers changed the outcome of the 2016 election. But they would do well to rethink things. Even a cursory look at the events of the past few years reveals Russian meddling was absolutely decisive in denying Clinton her rightful position as president-elect.

Here’s a quick rundown of 13 major moments where Clinton’s seemingly invincible presidential campaign was brought down thanks Russian hacking efforts:

1996: Russian Spetsnaz special forces pepper Clinton with sniper rifle fire as she lands in Sarajevo after the Bosnian War. Shortly after, Russian hackers destroy all video footage of this event, replacing it with fake news accounts that Clinton’s visit was peaceful. Clinton’s unbelievable bravery in Bosnia is subsequently disbelieved.

Jan. 28, 2009: Russia-financed black hat hackers in Donetsk, Ukraine, hack Clinton’s personal Blackberry and modify the emails she sends. An email demanding that Clinton follow all Department of State email rules is quietly deleted, and replaced with a spoof email demanding the creation of a private email server stored at her personal home in New York.

May 2013: A Russian hack of Clinton’s teleprompter modifies her speech to Banco Itau, altering her speech to say that her dream is “open borders” with the entire Western Hemisphere, instead of her original dream of “safe, well-regulated borders.”

February 2015: Chinese hackers in the employ of Moscow penetrate the Clinton Foundation and alter its payroll to pay men far more than women, causing the Clinton campaign embarrassment when this big imbalance is brought up, undermining their efforts to run a campaign on closing the pay gap.

May, 2015: Rudolph Epstein, a minor Clinton staffer co-opted by a Russian hacker’s girlfriend, convinces Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook to outsource the campaign’s decision-making to a computer program named Ada. The program, though, is simply the work of hackers from Novosibirsk, who use it as a vehicle to sabotage Clinton’s campaign while promoting various fake news storylines. The program steadily supplies Clinton with terrible ideas, such as printing off literal “woman cards” and joking about wiping her email server “with a cloth.”

Dec. 22, 2015: A group of Moscow hackers gain access to Clinton’s campaign website, posting an embarrassing fake news article about how “Hillary Clinton is just like your abuela.” This fake news damages Clinton’s campaign by causing an unjustified backlash from the public who regard it as ethnic pandering by Clinton.

March 13, 2016: A Russian spy in Clinton’s campaign swaps out her primary debate notes with doctored copies produced by Russian intelligence. The doctored notes include a line saying Clinton wants to put coal miners out of work, which Clinton mistakenly reads, alienating working class whites across the country.

March 15, 2016: The same Russian spy implants electrodes on an unsuspecting Clinton’s neck as she takes a nap, causing her to later bark like a dog during a rally in Reno, Nevada.

April 10, 2016: Russian agents in New York City advance $4 million into Bill de Blasio’s bank account, bribing him to make a joke about being on “C.P time” (colored people time) in his delayed endorsement of Clinton for president. The nefarious ploy costs Clinton thousands of black voters in swing states.

Sept. 7, 2016: Revolutionary Russian technology allows hackers to “hack” Clinton’s memories, causing her to forget entirely about the Benghazi attack and claim no Americans have died in Libya.

Sept. 11, 2016: Biologists tied to the Russian space agency, Roscosmos, use satellites to broadcast damaging rays directly into Clinton’s brain stem, causing her to abruptly collapse at a Sept. 11 memorial service after just 90 minutes outside in mild weather.

Oct. 18, 2016: Armenian hackers tied to Moscow burrow into Clinton’s campaign bank account, diverting $1 million meant for voter turnout operations in Michigan to the non-competitive states of Indiana and Missouri. For good measure, the hackers also cancel a $2 million ad buy in Pennsylvania and Florida, buying replacement ads in Arizona instead.

Nov. 2, 2016: A hacker collective in Smolensk diverts Clinton’s campaign plane away from General Mitchell International Airport in Milwaukee, forcing her to instead land in Tempe, Arizona, and campaign there. Thanks to this interference, Clinton doesn’t have a single campaign stop in Wisconsin and narrowly loses the state to Donald Trump.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770073&forum_id=2#34491042)