\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

The left's groups are all geared toward destroying organizations.

The left can't build a lasting organization for shit. If it ...
Curious center
  10/21/17
This is also intentional - a small motivated group of men ca...
pungent poppy area
  10/21/17
...
Useless cruel-hearted rehab nowag
  10/21/17
Strongly agree re: small motivated groups of men. History re...
Curious center
  10/21/17
Well, if it isn't the cake for libs it has to be the icing. ...
pungent poppy area
  10/21/17
Re: design, your supposition is correct. Anti-suffragist wri...
Curious center
  10/21/17
Lol, devastatingly absolute. Wonder why a strong black woman...
pungent poppy area
  10/21/17
Even if women can make it on boys standards, inevitably 2-3 ...
metal ebony codepig
  10/21/17


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: October 21st, 2017 8:33 AM
Author: Curious center

The left can't build a lasting organization for shit. If it could, it'd be the right.

That's why, with no conservative institutions left to destroy, the left will eat itself.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770366&forum_id=2#34493323)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 21st, 2017 8:41 AM
Author: pungent poppy area

This is also intentional - a small motivated group of men can do basically anything. Hence the eradication of everything from men's-only country clubs to motorcycle clubs to unisex sports

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770366&forum_id=2#34493338)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 21st, 2017 8:42 AM
Author: Useless cruel-hearted rehab nowag



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770366&forum_id=2#34493343)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 21st, 2017 8:45 AM
Author: Curious center

Strongly agree re: small motivated groups of men. History rests on their backs.

I wonder if it's willing destruction. Yes, in many cases - but the natural tendency of women is to want to join any group that is successful and hangs a "men only" sign. It's just the drive to CRASH THE BOY'S CLUB. Hence all boys' clubs will be crashed over time unless there's a legal or social norm maintaining them.

Personally I believe in voluntary association - no animus to the very rare woman who can maek it under objective standards. But of course we've reduced standards such that, e.g., you can graduate VMI w/o being able to do a single chin-up.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770366&forum_id=2#34493354)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 21st, 2017 8:47 AM
Author: pungent poppy area

Well, if it isn't the cake for libs it has to be the icing. Can't help but wonder if women's enfranchisement etc was designed (which it had to be, it's too patently absurd to arise naturally) to pre-emptively thwart any threats to whatever social order currently stands

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770366&forum_id=2#34493358)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 21st, 2017 8:51 AM
Author: Curious center

Re: design, your supposition is correct. Anti-suffragist writings are fun reading; I could find the pull-quote I was looking for re motives but here's Mills getting GAPED:

Exactly the same plan was followed by Mill

in handling the question of woman's suffrage.

Instead of dealing with woman as she is, and

with woman placed in a setting of actually sub-

sisting conditions, Mill takes as his theme a

woman who is a creature of his imagination.

This woman is, by assumption, in mental en-

dowments a replica of man. She lives in a

world which is, by tacit assumption, free from

complications of sex. And, if practical con-

siderations had ever come into the purview of

Mill's mind, she would, by tacit assumption, be

paying her own way, and be making full per-

sonal and financial contributions to the State.

It is in connexion with this fictitious woman

that Mill sets himself to work out the benefits 28

which women would derive from co-partner-

ship with men in the government of the State,

and those which such co-partnership would

confer on the community. Finally, practis-

ing again upon himself the same imposition as

in his Political Economy, this unpractical

trafficker in abstractions sets out to persuade

his reader that he has, by dealing with fictions

of the mind, effectively grappled with the

concrete problem of woman's suffrage.

This, then, is the philosopher who gives in-

tellectual prestige to the Woman's Suffrage

cause.

***

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/5183/5183-h/5183-h.htm

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770366&forum_id=2#34493365)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 21st, 2017 8:53 AM
Author: pungent poppy area

Lol, devastatingly absolute. Wonder why a strong black woman wasn't the brains behind suffragism - Hollywood needs to get to work convincing everyone it was

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770366&forum_id=2#34493371)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 21st, 2017 8:53 AM
Author: metal ebony codepig

Even if women can make it on boys standards, inevitably 2-3 guys in the group will want to fuck her and she’ll fuck up the group dynamic and distract from the mission.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3770366&forum_id=2#34493370)