Posner (as dist. judge) reversed per curiam for berating a pro se defendant
| floppy milky field | 10/24/17 | | Adventurous Wrinkle Site | 10/24/17 | | white spectacular reading party | 10/25/17 | | jet native coldplay fan | 10/25/17 | | sexy wonderful point | 10/24/17 | | floppy milky field | 10/24/17 | | talented pontificating regret | 10/24/17 | | Salmon Lodge Cuck | 10/24/17 | | frozen gas station ape | 10/24/17 | | Adventurous Wrinkle Site | 10/24/17 | | talented pontificating regret | 10/24/17 | | sepia station | 10/25/17 | | floppy milky field | 10/24/17 | | jade pit | 10/24/17 | | Salmon Lodge Cuck | 10/24/17 | | translucent stimulating boistinker public bath | 10/25/17 | | Embarrassed to the bone judgmental fanboi dilemma | 10/24/17 | | violet factory reset button location | 10/24/17 | | Adventurous Wrinkle Site | 10/24/17 | | duck-like french chef | 10/24/17 | | violet factory reset button location | 10/24/17 | | frozen gas station ape | 10/24/17 | | Salmon Lodge Cuck | 10/24/17 | | floppy milky field | 10/24/17 | | jade pit | 10/24/17 | | Sooty dragon | 10/24/17 | | Curious hairy legs | 10/25/17 | | submissive sneaky criminal | 10/24/17 | | white spectacular reading party | 10/25/17 | | sexy wonderful point | 10/24/17 | | stirring hyperventilating resort | 10/24/17 | | alcoholic fuchsia center goyim | 10/24/17 | | stirring hyperventilating resort | 10/24/17 | | Sooty dragon | 10/24/17 | | frozen gas station ape | 10/24/17 | | floppy milky field | 10/24/17 | | sexy wonderful point | 10/24/17 | | translucent stimulating boistinker public bath | 10/25/17 | | Salmon Lodge Cuck | 10/24/17 | | Curious hairy legs | 10/25/17 | | Aromatic boiling water immigrant | 10/24/17 | | Dun effete ladyboy | 10/24/17 | | Aromatic boiling water immigrant | 10/24/17 | | jet native coldplay fan | 10/25/17 | | Salmon Lodge Cuck | 10/24/17 | | deranged pale heaven lettuce | 10/24/17 | | floppy milky field | 10/24/17 | | ocher party of the first part | 10/24/17 | | Yellow excitant house | 10/24/17 | | 180 transparent parlour legend | 03/22/18 | | Dun effete ladyboy | 10/24/17 | | Adventurous Wrinkle Site | 10/24/17 | | Odious well-lubricated community account | 10/24/17 | | sexy wonderful point | 10/25/17 | | Exciting lay azn | 10/25/17 | | sexy wonderful point | 10/25/17 | | stirring hyperventilating resort | 10/24/17 | | submissive sneaky criminal | 10/24/17 | | stirring hyperventilating resort | 10/25/17 | | sepia station | 10/25/17 | | translucent stimulating boistinker public bath | 10/25/17 | | sepia station | 10/25/17 | | translucent stimulating boistinker public bath | 10/25/17 | | sexy wonderful point | 10/25/17 | | sepia station | 10/25/17 | | Exhilarant Parlor Gaming Laptop | 03/22/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 24th, 2017 8:43 PM Author: frozen gas station ape
Where does it say posner was the trial judge?
Edit: "circuit judge" had me confused.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3773812&forum_id=2#34521716) |
|
Date: October 25th, 2017 9:46 AM Author: translucent stimulating boistinker public bath
same, I assumed this would be some lame "gotcha" citing a 25 year old decision. No it happened while Posner was busily berating other members of the bench for mistreating pro se defendants.
I also like how they cite Posner's own 7th circuit cases against him.
Notably it's per curiam. no one wanted to risk a vendetta.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3773812&forum_id=2#34524259) |
Date: October 24th, 2017 8:48 PM Author: violet factory reset button location
lol, sovereign citizens are amazing.
And lol @ Posner getting overturned. Surprised it's not harmless but I wonder if his former colleagues just want to torment him
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3773812&forum_id=2#34521754) |
|
Date: October 24th, 2017 8:58 PM Author: floppy milky field
No, this opinion is particularly hilarious in light of his retirement.
Posner retired in indignation because he wanted to publish internal 7th Circuit documents (including correspondence with Wood) about how the court treats pro she appellants badly and don't give them enough help.
Then, today, Posner is reversed for berating a pro she litigating.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3773812&forum_id=2#34521841) |
Date: October 24th, 2017 8:55 PM Author: frozen gas station ape
http://ca3blog.com/judges/posners-new-book-is-bananas-but-you-might-want-it-anyway/
And why did Posner anoint himself as filter between the staff attorneys and his colleagues? Largely, he says, because “uniquely among this court’s judges, [he had] a deeply felt commitment to the welfare of the pro se litigants.” But, by his own account, he only “became interested in the staff attorney program in the late winter/early spring of this year (2017).” And in his preceding three and a half decades on the court, “I’m pretty sure I’d never even discussed it with another judge.” Deeply? Uniquely?
It gets worse. Posner chooses to reveal the initial panel vote in a still-not-yet-decided appeal that he identifies by name. The other two panel members plan to affirm, he tells us. (Posner disagrees, so we get two paragraphs summarizing and quoting from the dissent he would have filed.) What compelling reason led him to include this stunning disclosure in a book ostensibly about pro se’s and televising arguments, when this case has nothing to do with either? Because “I’ve decided to note two recent clashes with colleagues.” This is not Posner-being-Posner, this is madness.
The other “clash” he chooses to recount is when he emailed all the judges on the court to tell them he thought it odd that some judges referred to Wood as “Chief Diane.” He admits this one “doesn’t reflect credit on me” and, “In retrospect, I cannot understand what moved me to email the judges ….” Me neither.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3773812&forum_id=2#34521807) |
Date: October 24th, 2017 8:55 PM Author: Salmon Lodge Cuck
Model jury instructions:
[O]ne [element] is that ... the scheme to defraud involved a materially false or fraudulent pre- tense, representation, or promise. That’s very important, that notion of materiality. Because if you—sometimes people will lie, for example, out of embarrassment. You know, someone asks your age, you knock a couple of years off, or something like that. That would—those are not—those little white lies, those are not mate- rial falsehoods. They don’t—I mean, they may embarrass you when it’s discovered, but they’re not—that’s not wrongful conduct. It’s when, with specific reference to our case, if you—if you tell—if you tell the Internal Revenue Ser- vice a lie which is capable of getting them to do something which they would never do if they knew the truth, namely, give you $300,000 to which you’re not entitled, that is a material falsehood. That’s fraud. And that is an element of the charges.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3773812&forum_id=2#34521810) |
Date: October 25th, 2017 9:41 AM Author: sepia station
lulz at are IRS:
" Between August 2009 and November 2010, El-Bey filed a total of six tax returns by mail with the IRS in the name of the trust, each seeking a $300,000 refund. Each return was essentially identical: each claimed $900,000 in trust income, $900,000 in fees, $7,590 in exemptions, and $300,000 in withholding. Based on this return, the IRS issued and mailed a $300,000 refund check to 'Hakeem El Bey Trust, Hakeem El Bey Trustee.'"
"Hey, guys, you withheld $300,000 from my trust and totally owe it back to me. Please handle, thanks."
"Seems legit. Here's your money. Thank."
Makes you wonder how much low level outright fraud goes on without ever being detected. If he was less greedy and asked for a $30,000 "refund," would it have been too low dollar for anybody to check into?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3773812&forum_id=2#34524226) |
Date: March 22nd, 2018 3:07 AM Author: Exhilarant Parlor Gaming Laptop
Not so hidden lesson: The IRS will give you $300,00 two out of every five times you ask for it.
We can still maek it!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3773812&forum_id=2#35659357)
|
|
|