these mods are out of control

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3777325&forum_id=2#34547615)

How a Single Mother In Debt Over $200K Is Fixing Her Finances

4 Ways Your Credit Union Is Changing — for the Better

Read "AgeProof: Living Longer Without Running Out of Money or Breaking a Hip" to Live Your Best Life

7 Clever Uses for Tea Bags and Hair Clips

5 Hotel Room Booking Tools Every Frugal Traveler Should Know

The 5 Best Apps for Busy Working Parents

9 Reasons Why the U.S. Economy Is Kicking the World's Butt

5 Ways to Profit From Obama's Cuba Announcement

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3777325&forum_id=2#34547802)

she was trying to do the right thing since it was technically an "outting" thread, even though julia has self-outted 239428394389432849023 times

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3777325&forum_id=2#34547825)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3777325&forum_id=2#34547844)

i think it shows she was trying to do the right thing

there is a grey area where rach has told mods to delete outting threads and poasts but in some cases its ok to leave poasts up if they have voluntarily self-outted

twentynine was err'ing on the side of caution. i dont think its a big deal. she can discuss it with rach.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3777325&forum_id=2#34547854)

thats it.

im not saying twentynines decision was right. im just saying the thinking behind it wasnt completely out of left field since mods are specifically told to remove stuff related to people being outted. its something she can discuss with rach and he can clarify with her. not something for us to have a stroke about or freak out about.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3777325&forum_id=2#34547872)

Aka, no thinking

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3777325&forum_id=2#34547883)

also, no reason to nuke an entire thread, why not mod individual posts which are offensive (none of which qualify, but whatever). the op of that thread was just a link to a cnbc article.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3777325&forum_id=2#34547886)

i dont think its anything for people to freak out about

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3777325&forum_id=2#34547917)

if what she thinks is the "right thing" is clearly the wrong decision then she clearly shouldn't be a mod. simple as that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3777325&forum_id=2#34548035)

I actually hate finding out people's IRL info.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3777325&forum_id=2#34552672)

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

like star wars doesnt have the most predictable fucking "plot" of any movie series, ever.

HAHAHAHAHAHAH

and when this happened, did you xoxo boys all say 'HEY! THAT PENIS-HAVER ISNT FIT TO BE A MOD! PENIS-HAVERS ARE CLEARLY UNFIT WITH THEIR SMALL BRAINS!' ?

thats far FAR worse than twentynine modding a thread she felt was inappropriate for outting reasons

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3777325&forum_id=2#34547969)

Author: Kenneth Pinyan (earl)

How the fuck can anyone defend spoilers in thread titles. Unlike spam and even some outing threads, there is no positive content in a thread title that says:

"why does X die in next weeks game of thrones?"

the only purpose is to be a fucking asshole and ruin the enjoyment of things people do IRL.

Trolling and grieving are different things.

Also I think I should be able to post the John Mellencamp song about Rach and ________ without getting deleted.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2844967&forum_id=2,5#27604536)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3777325&forum_id=2#34547971)

Remember the NUMBER ONE rule in our TTT country with no moral compass or social cohesion - HAVE ZERO FUCKING SHAME AND FUCK OVER EVERYBODY TO MOVE UP AN INCH

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3777325&forum_id=2#34549490)

they do have those same dead eyes from the mirror picture she posted

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3777325&forum_id=2#34549649)