http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2017/11/06/bannon-george-w-bush-single-destructive-president-u-s-history-including-james-buchanan/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3787737&forum_id=2#34620605)

Please itemize this debt that "Obama" allegedly "load[ed] the US up with." Tyia

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3787737&forum_id=2#34622278)

bush himself argued during the 2000 campaign that he understood these things. his february 2001 budget prioritized the reduction of the $5.7 trillion national debt to $3.7 trillion over the next decade in order to manage these potential future liabilities. when he took control, the US was strong, but in a tenuous poise, and his fundamental job was to use the vast resources given to him and manage/invest them with sufficient wisdom to strengthen that poise.

he goddamn did the opposite. he doubled the debt, embroiled the nation in unpopular wars, allowed the demographics to worsen, allowed looters to hucksterize the economy, did nothing to control ANY of the long-term potential crises like healthcare spending increases or social security financing, and hurled the country headfirst off the ledge.

we have a great distance yet to fall, so the effects of his actions are not yet entirely manifest, but bush will very probably be remembered as the bumbling dope who poison-pilled the entire american empire and perhaps the country as a whole. he was given so much that it's really quite boggling how thoroughly he managed to squander our national inheritance in eight short years.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3787737&forum_id=2#34620802)

- Demographics with some adjustments are manageable and clear future melting pot solution

- Economy healthy now

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3787737&forum_id=2#34624342)

but bush was placed in trust of a mature empire that required careful and responsible management more than anything else. when you're young and break a bone, it will pop right back together. your youthful cells and marrow will rush over to the injury and glue it up and you'll keep growing. but when you're 75, and you shatter your hip because bush inexplicably tossed you down the stairs, that's going to be rough.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3787737&forum_id=2#34621249)

even poasters on the waitlist at TUFTS LAW SCHOOL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3787737&forum_id=2#34621818)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3787737&forum_id=2#34627236)

perhaps bush could be criticized as the worst president ever, as follows:

number one-he should have known better, when iraq exploded a nuclear bomb over israel in 2007, bush had kept his head in the sand, ignoring the refusal of iraq to let inspectors into his nuclear facilities.

number two-how stupid was bush to not bail out the banking industry? everyone knew they were too big to fail. he should have bailed them out and then taken steps to oversee the industry properly. instead, he let them fail and we still haven't recovered.

number three-how stupid was bush to continue to treat china as an enemy. they had no choice but to take aggressive steps in (name countries) and the fact that we are at the brink of war with a goliath like china is proof positive of bush's ineptitude. etc.

Number One was the Iraq war, $6 trillion in Iraq and Afghanistan, the wars still haven’t been won. Iraq is as big of a disaster as it’s ever been. It’s caused total chaos in the Middle East. And it was either he outright lied to the American people or he’s just totally incompetent and misread what the information was,” he charged.

“The second was the financial crisis,” Bannon continued. “The financial crisis happened on his watch. It came to a head in September 2008. He just walked away from it, didn’t come up with any solutions. The thing was a debacle. We still suffer from that today. The solution was to, you know, flood the zone with liquidity, trillions and trillions of dollars of liquidity have inflated assets and made the owners of equity and real estate filthy rich, and the working men and women of this country have gotten stiffed after they had to pay for the bailouts.”

“But the most important part of what he was destructive about is China. It was on his watch they really set in motion Most Favored Nation and getting into the WTO. I know the Clintons pushed that and tried to implement it, but Bush looked at China, the whole Bush administration said China is going to get wealthier, is becoming more democratic, and more free-market capitalist. That was a massive, massive mistake,” he said.

“China today is a competitor-slash-enemy, having economic warfare against us, of incalculable power. That started with the Bush administration. He is the single most destructive president in the history of the country, and I include James Buchanan in that. For him to come and attack President Trump is an absolute disgrace,” Bannon concluded

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3787737&forum_id=2#34622021)

Bailouts were a terrible idea. Private gains, socialized losses is not the way to run an economy, idiot.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3787737&forum_id=2#34624141)

btw, dipshit, i think we agree more often than not.

also, i'm not a fan of bailouts and didn't support them, but bush did them and in retrospect they worked out just fine.

my point was that had he not done the bailouts, he could have easily have been criticized when all hell broke loose and the economy went to hell.

so, why don't you respond to the moron's other points?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3787737&forum_id=2#34626353)