\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Only XO can pierce this scholarship blaming UMC for wealth inequality

xo does a good job fleshing out UMC vs the RICH but... ...
sepia stirring field
  11/17/17


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 17th, 2017 3:28 PM
Author: sepia stirring field

xo does a good job fleshing out UMC vs the RICH

but...

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/17/upshot/income-inequality-united-states.html

The United States also stands out in terms of how much money its elite professionals earn relative to the median worker. Workers at the 90th percentile of the income distribution for professionals make 3.5 times the earnings of the typical (median) worker in all occupations in the United States. Only Mexico and Israel, which have very high inequality, compensate professionals so disproportionately. In Switzerland, the Netherlands, Finland and Denmark, the ratio is about 2 to 1.

This ratio, the elite professions premium, is very highly correlated with income inequality across countries.

Others are noticing these trends. A new book, “The Captured Economy” by Brink Lindsey and Steven Teles, argues that regressive regulations — laws that benefit the rich — are a primary cause of the extraordinary income gains among elite professionals and financial managers in the United States and of a reduction in growth.

This year, the Brookings Institution’s Richard Reeves wrote a book about how people in the upper middle class have shaped both legal and cultural norms to their advantage. From different perspectives, Joseph Stiglitz, Robert Reich and Luigi Zingales have also written extensively about how the political power of elites has undermined markets.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800834&forum_id=2#34711325)