Litigators: do you try to harass opponents to settle via oppressive discovery
| Swashbuckling blood rage | 11/18/17 | | Odious Peach Immigrant Casino | 11/18/17 | | Sadistic useless tattoo | 11/18/17 | | dun up-to-no-good tanning salon | 11/18/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:51 PM Author: dun up-to-no-good tanning salon
No. Usually it's the other way around.
In my last major case, the shit-tier BigLaw firm I was up against cut and pasted every sentence of the complaint into a contention special interrogatory. Like "state all facts upon which you base your contention that [defendant] is a California LLC," "state all facts upon which you base your contention that [plaintiff] and [defendant] entered into a contract on [date]," "state all facts upon which you base your contention that the contract states [x]," and similar bullshit like that.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3801886&forum_id=2#34719092) |
|
|