The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Litigators: do you try to harass opponents to settle via oppressive discovery
| exhilarant henna twinkling uncleanness | 11/18/17 |
| cream ape | 11/18/17 |
| Adulterous cerebral knife jewess | 11/18/17 |
| rose stage affirmative action | 11/18/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:46 PM Author: exhilarant henna twinkling uncleanness (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3801886&forum_id=2#34719053) |
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:46 PM Author: cream ape Isn't this what biglaw firms do vs small plaintiffs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3801886&forum_id=2#34719055) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:50 PM Author: Adulterous cerebral knife jewess not by volume but by shaming. I hate volumes of paperwork. and that's not plaintiffs' style anyway. I don't bury the other side; I ask for shit I know they don't have, don't want to turn over, but that isn't privileged. then I threaten to file for discovery sanctions unless they drop the case. usually i'll over counsel $500 to cover his filing fees/summons/process server. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3801886&forum_id=2#34719081) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:51 PM Author: rose stage affirmative action No. Usually it's the other way around.
In my last major case, the shit-tier BigLaw firm I was up against cut and pasted every sentence of the complaint into a contention special interrogatory. Like "state all facts upon which you base your contention that [defendant] is a California LLC," "state all facts upon which you base your contention that [plaintiff] and [defendant] entered into a contract on [date]," "state all facts upon which you base your contention that the contract states [x]," and similar bullshit like that. |