The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
U.S. cities with surprisingly SMALL skylines?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 20th, 2017 12:53 AM Author: Shaky Place Of Business Azn phoenix is a 4.5-million-person metro region, one of america's 15 biggest metros, and yet, its tallest building is from the early-70's and isn't even 500 feet tall. how did this happen?
http://www.gita.org/resource/resmgr/event_calendar_images/2017_0724_Phoenix_Crop.jpg
phoenix is truly the "cute cock" of american skylines, avoiding the big oafish skyscrapers that weigh down other cities. |
Date: November 20th, 2017 12:53 AM Author: Indigo glittery principal's office codepig (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803158&forum_id=2#34728451) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 12:54 AM Author: Galvanic Shrine Las Vegas (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803158&forum_id=2#34728453) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 12:56 AM Author: razzle naked heaven Green Bay has an NFL team and their skyline doesn't have a building with more than 7 stories
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f6/Downtown_Green_Bay.JPG
The tallest building in the city is a 10 story hospital, but it isn't downtown |
 |
Date: November 20th, 2017 12:59 AM Author: Galvanic Shrine yeah what's that about? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803158&forum_id=2#34728476) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:16 AM Author: razzle naked heaven Well the city only has like 100k people. The skyline is pretty typical for a city of that size (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803158&forum_id=2#34728546) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:03 AM Author: Passionate territorial tanning salon stuffwhitepeoplelike: pretending "metro areas" = cities proper (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803158&forum_id=2#34728489) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:11 AM Author: Shaky Place Of Business Azn metro is the only sensible way of comparing populations. if LA annexed a bunch of shit overnight it would potentially be a more populous city than NYC, but it wouldn't change anything, since the overall metro is smaller. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803158&forum_id=2#34728522) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:13 AM Author: Passionate territorial tanning salon (guy who thinks exurb sprawl is considered part of cities proper) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803158&forum_id=2#34728532) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:26 AM Author: Shaky Place Of Business Azn they are part of the population of a metro area, just as they would be anywhere else around the world. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803158&forum_id=2#34728619) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:28 AM Author: Passionate territorial tanning salon nope. the U.S. just has SHIT pure cities and conveniently including suburbs/exurbs doesnt hide said shittiness (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803158&forum_id=2#34728631) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:52 AM Author: Shaky Place Of Business Azn you have autism.
if you would like to make a SUBSTANTIVE contribution to the thread - rather than trying to derail it - please do. |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 2:01 AM Author: Passionate territorial tanning salon the U.S. is the only country on earth where people who live outside city limits consider themselves to be living in the city. that is because your cities are fucking shitty cities that have narrow boundaries with few people.
conveniently redrawing the boundaries so that you can pretend to be living inside proper city limits is stupid as fuck. its just a way to pretend a city's population is larger than it really is. if you live in a city proper, you live in the city proper. if you live outside a city, you live outside the city. thats it nigga.
HTFH, dummy |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:03 AM Author: Excitant ivory national nowag San Antonio has only 11 buildings over 300 feet despite a metro pop of more than 2.5 million (including 1.5 million+ in the city proper). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803158&forum_id=2#34728490) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:05 AM Author: Curious base nyc (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803158&forum_id=2#34728496) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:16 AM Author: Trip Gunner Piazza DC is the obvious answer, no? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803158&forum_id=2#34728547) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:24 AM Author: Excitant ivory national nowag Not really surprising; DC banned tall buildings. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803158&forum_id=2#34728602) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:26 AM Author: Shaky Place Of Business Azn not exactly; there are plenty of skyscrapers in the DC area these days. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803158&forum_id=2#34728620) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:59 AM Author: mewling pearly generalized bond tampa
san diego |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 2:00 AM Author: Submissive diverse property shitlib Interesting (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803158&forum_id=2#34728765) |