The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Lmao another woman said Franken groped her
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 20th, 2017 10:42 AM Author: contagious fanboi Ljl Jews (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34730316) |
Date: November 20th, 2017 10:50 AM Author: contagious fanboi (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34730357) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 10:50 AM Author: Cobalt gaping link? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34730360) |
 |
Date: November 20th, 2017 10:54 AM Author: hairraiser bearded turdskin (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34730384) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 10:55 AM Author: judgmental supple nibblets dragon I always assumed that Franken was gay. I'm proud of him. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34730396) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 10:55 AM Author: ruby soul-stirring stead One weird trick: Minnesota statutes state that "intentional touching of the clothing covering the immediate area of the buttocks" is not considered criminal sexual conduct.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/20/politics/al-franken-inappropriate-touch-2010/index.html
Highlights:
Franken groped victim's ass while taking picture at State Fair in 2010. Victim told her husband immediately, then posted about it on Facebook. Libs?
|
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 10:59 AM Author: turquoise up-to-no-good field round eye How was this ignored? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34730412) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:16 AM Author: ruby soul-stirring stead She didn't report it to the news or anything at the time, her and cucky laughed it off as some light grabbing. But it's a different time now (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34730524) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:27 AM Author: Marvelous locale this is a witch hunt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34730588) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:34 AM Author: ruby soul-stirring stead She poasted on Facebook at the time that he was a grabby lil creeper (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34730639) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:08 AM Author: Cobalt gaping lmao (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34730475) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:14 AM Author: contagious fanboi Rofl (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34730514) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:22 AM Author: Histrionic Clear Shitlib A review of the legislative history shows there was general consensus among lawmakers that the buttocks "are not inherently sexual in nature" and that the anus in particular is merely "the end point of the digestive system." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34730560) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:29 AM Author: thirsty corner Oh this? Just my BOISTINKER. Nothing sexual about it. Now please put ur hand up there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34730594) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:39 AM Author: contagious fanboi (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34730666) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:21 AM Author: Marvelous locale the statute actually does say this. xo Minnesota legislature
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=609.3451 |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:33 AM Author: ruby soul-stirring stead Sexual contact also includes the intentional removal or attempted removal of clothing covering the complainant's intimate parts or undergarments, and the nonconsensual touching by the complainant of the actor's intimate parts, effected by the actor, if the action is performed with sexual or aggressive intent.
QUESTION: consider the language "the intentional removal or attempted removal of clothing covering the complainant's intimate parts or undergarments, and the nonconsensual touching by the complainant of the actor's intimate parts," The statute expressly includes nonconsensual in its definition of the second part of this sentence. Therefore the legislature deliberately chose to criminalize "the intentional removal or attempted removal of clothing covering the complainant's intimate parts or undergarments" WITHOUT regard to consent. So if ur wife greets you in the bedroom with a trench coat over lingerie, and you remove her trench coat, you are guilty of criminal sexual conduct and should report to Somali prison. |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:41 AM Author: Vibrant piazza If your hand "slipped" and "missed" when you "intended" to put your hand around her waist, then you would have a reasonable basis to argue that is was not "performed with sexual or aggressive intent" and we're now trying to prove state of mind beyond a reasonable doubt. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34730684) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:31 PM Author: Marvelous locale no, subd. 1 requires the sexual contact to be nonconsensual in order to be criminalized. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34731805) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:36 AM Author: Vibrant piazza Hahaha, got to hand it to this Jew. He's playing the game on a whole different level. It's almost sad to see him get "b-b-but where do we draw the line" pwn3d like this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803457&forum_id=2#34730646) |