\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

VOX: We need to introduce concept of REVOCABLE ASSENT TO SEX

Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain ...
Spectacular Stubborn Therapy Library
  11/20/17
What if consent is revoked AFTER the point of no return w/r/...
Chartreuse tripping whorehouse
  11/20/17
ASSENT must be obtained before the act begins (before intial...
tantric business firm
  11/20/17
yes, the author's "argument" is that assent should...
indecent state hominid
  11/20/17
Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain ...
Yapping Meetinghouse
  11/20/17
...
indecent state hominid
  11/21/17
You have my assurance
Pink soul-stirring lodge jap
  11/21/17
Why is this better than “no sex before marriage”?
Poppy Foreskin Market
  11/21/17


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:33 PM
Author: Spectacular Stubborn Therapy Library

Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain age range (say, 16 to 21) to offer “assent” to sex with a significantly older person — but permit them to revoke that assent at any time. “Assent” is a weaker form of agreement, legally speaking, than “consent.”

https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/11/20/16677180/age-consent-teenage-psychology-law-roy-moore

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731833)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:35 PM
Author: Chartreuse tripping whorehouse

What if consent is revoked AFTER the point of no return w/r/t ejaculation? Still rape?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731858)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:38 PM
Author: tantric business firm

ASSENT must be obtained before the act begins (before intial convo and then again before any form of touching then again before kiss then again before sex), only CONSENT is required prior to EJACULATION to account for physiological peculiarities of the male gender

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731898)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:38 PM
Author: indecent state hominid

yes, the author's "argument" is that assent should be revocable even after the fact. If you meet a 21 year old woman, marry her, then 40 years later divorce her, she can retroactively withdraw her assent and make you an ex post facto rapist.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731900)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:36 PM
Author: Yapping Meetinghouse

Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain age range (say, 16 to 21) to offer “ass” to sex with a significantly older person — but permit them to revoke that ass at any time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731873)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2017 8:14 AM
Author: indecent state hominid



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737948)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2017 8:16 AM
Author: Pink soul-stirring lodge jap

You have my assurance

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737960)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2017 8:18 AM
Author: Poppy Foreskin Market

Why is this better than “no sex before marriage”?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737972)