The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
VOX: We need to introduce concept of REVOCABLE ASSENT TO SEX
| coral library gaping | 11/20/17 |
| bat shit crazy lavender hissy fit | 11/20/17 |
| Vibrant business firm digit ratio | 11/20/17 |
| Beta orchestra pit electric furnace | 11/20/17 |
| stirring double fault jew | 11/20/17 |
| Beta orchestra pit electric furnace | 11/21/17 |
| Titillating haunting hairy legs | 11/21/17 |
| Pale place of business circlehead | 11/21/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:33 PM Author: coral library gaping Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain age range (say, 16 to 21) to offer “assent” to sex with a significantly older person — but permit them to revoke that assent at any time. “Assent” is a weaker form of agreement, legally speaking, than “consent.”
https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/11/20/16677180/age-consent-teenage-psychology-law-roy-moore |
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:35 PM Author: bat shit crazy lavender hissy fit What if consent is revoked AFTER the point of no return w/r/t ejaculation? Still rape? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731858) |
 |
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:38 PM Author: Vibrant business firm digit ratio ASSENT must be obtained before the act begins (before intial convo and then again before any form of touching then again before kiss then again before sex), only CONSENT is required prior to EJACULATION to account for physiological peculiarities of the male gender (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731898) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:38 PM Author: Beta orchestra pit electric furnace yes, the author's "argument" is that assent should be revocable even after the fact. If you meet a 21 year old woman, marry her, then 40 years later divorce her, she can retroactively withdraw her assent and make you an ex post facto rapist.
|
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:36 PM Author: stirring double fault jew Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain age range (say, 16 to 21) to offer “ass” to sex with a significantly older person — but permit them to revoke that ass at any time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731873) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 8:14 AM Author: Beta orchestra pit electric furnace (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737948) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 8:16 AM Author: Titillating haunting hairy legs You have my assurance (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737960) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 8:18 AM Author: Pale place of business circlehead Why is this better than “no sex before marriage”? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737972) |