\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

VOX: We need to introduce concept of REVOCABLE ASSENT TO SEX

Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain ...
Passionate Onyx Voyeur Doctorate
  11/20/17
What if consent is revoked AFTER the point of no return w/r/...
exciting walnut factory reset button lettuce
  11/20/17
ASSENT must be obtained before the act begins (before intial...
Fighting lodge
  11/20/17
yes, the author's "argument" is that assent should...
Drab Institution
  11/20/17
Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain ...
trip erotic hell pisswyrm
  11/20/17
...
Drab Institution
  11/21/17
You have my assurance
coral set faggot firefighter
  11/21/17
Why is this better than “no sex before marriage”?
milky beady-eyed volcanic crater
  11/21/17


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:33 PM
Author: Passionate Onyx Voyeur Doctorate

Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain age range (say, 16 to 21) to offer “assent” to sex with a significantly older person — but permit them to revoke that assent at any time. “Assent” is a weaker form of agreement, legally speaking, than “consent.”

https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/11/20/16677180/age-consent-teenage-psychology-law-roy-moore

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731833)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:35 PM
Author: exciting walnut factory reset button lettuce

What if consent is revoked AFTER the point of no return w/r/t ejaculation? Still rape?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731858)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:38 PM
Author: Fighting lodge

ASSENT must be obtained before the act begins (before intial convo and then again before any form of touching then again before kiss then again before sex), only CONSENT is required prior to EJACULATION to account for physiological peculiarities of the male gender

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731898)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:38 PM
Author: Drab Institution

yes, the author's "argument" is that assent should be revocable even after the fact. If you meet a 21 year old woman, marry her, then 40 years later divorce her, she can retroactively withdraw her assent and make you an ex post facto rapist.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731900)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:36 PM
Author: trip erotic hell pisswyrm

Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain age range (say, 16 to 21) to offer “ass” to sex with a significantly older person — but permit them to revoke that ass at any time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731873)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2017 8:14 AM
Author: Drab Institution



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737948)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2017 8:16 AM
Author: coral set faggot firefighter

You have my assurance

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737960)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2017 8:18 AM
Author: milky beady-eyed volcanic crater

Why is this better than “no sex before marriage”?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737972)