\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

VOX: We need to introduce concept of REVOCABLE ASSENT TO SEX

Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain ...
olive reading party volcanic crater
  11/20/17
What if consent is revoked AFTER the point of no return w/r/...
Idiotic alpha philosopher-king
  11/20/17
ASSENT must be obtained before the act begins (before intial...
Disturbing Address
  11/20/17
yes, the author's "argument" is that assent should...
Fishy area nibblets
  11/20/17
Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain ...
ebony crusty garrison therapy
  11/20/17
...
Fishy area nibblets
  11/21/17
You have my assurance
Swollen Black Chapel Ladyboy
  11/21/17
Why is this better than “no sex before marriage”?
naked aromatic base
  11/21/17


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:33 PM
Author: olive reading party volcanic crater

Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain age range (say, 16 to 21) to offer “assent” to sex with a significantly older person — but permit them to revoke that assent at any time. “Assent” is a weaker form of agreement, legally speaking, than “consent.”

https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/11/20/16677180/age-consent-teenage-psychology-law-roy-moore

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731833)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:35 PM
Author: Idiotic alpha philosopher-king

What if consent is revoked AFTER the point of no return w/r/t ejaculation? Still rape?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731858)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:38 PM
Author: Disturbing Address

ASSENT must be obtained before the act begins (before intial convo and then again before any form of touching then again before kiss then again before sex), only CONSENT is required prior to EJACULATION to account for physiological peculiarities of the male gender

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731898)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:38 PM
Author: Fishy area nibblets

yes, the author's "argument" is that assent should be revocable even after the fact. If you meet a 21 year old woman, marry her, then 40 years later divorce her, she can retroactively withdraw her assent and make you an ex post facto rapist.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731900)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:36 PM
Author: ebony crusty garrison therapy

Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain age range (say, 16 to 21) to offer “ass” to sex with a significantly older person — but permit them to revoke that ass at any time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731873)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2017 8:14 AM
Author: Fishy area nibblets



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737948)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2017 8:16 AM
Author: Swollen Black Chapel Ladyboy

You have my assurance

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737960)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2017 8:18 AM
Author: naked aromatic base

Why is this better than “no sex before marriage”?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737972)