\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

VOX: We need to introduce concept of REVOCABLE ASSENT TO SEX

Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain ...
Supple famous landscape painting
  11/20/17
What if consent is revoked AFTER the point of no return w/r/...
Impressive spot
  11/20/17
ASSENT must be obtained before the act begins (before intial...
Spruce odious market
  11/20/17
yes, the author's "argument" is that assent should...
razzle-dazzle ivory property
  11/20/17
Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain ...
sapphire locus
  11/20/17
...
razzle-dazzle ivory property
  11/21/17
You have my assurance
Obsidian Institution
  11/21/17
Why is this better than “no sex before marriage”?
Aromatic Startled Gas Station Water Buffalo
  11/21/17


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:33 PM
Author: Supple famous landscape painting

Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain age range (say, 16 to 21) to offer “assent” to sex with a significantly older person — but permit them to revoke that assent at any time. “Assent” is a weaker form of agreement, legally speaking, than “consent.”

https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/11/20/16677180/age-consent-teenage-psychology-law-roy-moore

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731833)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:35 PM
Author: Impressive spot

What if consent is revoked AFTER the point of no return w/r/t ejaculation? Still rape?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731858)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:38 PM
Author: Spruce odious market

ASSENT must be obtained before the act begins (before intial convo and then again before any form of touching then again before kiss then again before sex), only CONSENT is required prior to EJACULATION to account for physiological peculiarities of the male gender

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731898)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:38 PM
Author: razzle-dazzle ivory property

yes, the author's "argument" is that assent should be revocable even after the fact. If you meet a 21 year old woman, marry her, then 40 years later divorce her, she can retroactively withdraw her assent and make you an ex post facto rapist.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731900)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 20th, 2017 1:36 PM
Author: sapphire locus

Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain age range (say, 16 to 21) to offer “ass” to sex with a significantly older person — but permit them to revoke that ass at any time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731873)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2017 8:14 AM
Author: razzle-dazzle ivory property



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737948)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2017 8:16 AM
Author: Obsidian Institution

You have my assurance

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737960)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 21st, 2017 8:18 AM
Author: Aromatic Startled Gas Station Water Buffalo

Why is this better than “no sex before marriage”?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737972)