The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
VOX: We need to introduce concept of REVOCABLE ASSENT TO SEX
| Blathering Wine Institution | 11/20/17 |
| Aphrodisiac Aggressive Gas Station Marketing Idea | 11/20/17 |
| carnelian vigorous home | 11/20/17 |
| Plum disrespectful faggotry | 11/20/17 |
| diverse cyan state | 11/20/17 |
| Plum disrespectful faggotry | 11/21/17 |
| Grizzly trailer park | 11/21/17 |
| Free-loading internet-worthy party of the first part potus | 11/21/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:33 PM Author: Blathering Wine Institution Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain age range (say, 16 to 21) to offer “assent” to sex with a significantly older person — but permit them to revoke that assent at any time. “Assent” is a weaker form of agreement, legally speaking, than “consent.”
https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/11/20/16677180/age-consent-teenage-psychology-law-roy-moore |
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:35 PM Author: Aphrodisiac Aggressive Gas Station Marketing Idea What if consent is revoked AFTER the point of no return w/r/t ejaculation? Still rape? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731858) |
 |
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:38 PM Author: carnelian vigorous home ASSENT must be obtained before the act begins (before intial convo and then again before any form of touching then again before kiss then again before sex), only CONSENT is required prior to EJACULATION to account for physiological peculiarities of the male gender (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731898) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:38 PM Author: Plum disrespectful faggotry yes, the author's "argument" is that assent should be revocable even after the fact. If you meet a 21 year old woman, marry her, then 40 years later divorce her, she can retroactively withdraw her assent and make you an ex post facto rapist.
|
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 1:36 PM Author: diverse cyan state Consent laws, I argue, should allow people within a certain age range (say, 16 to 21) to offer “ass” to sex with a significantly older person — but permit them to revoke that ass at any time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34731873) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 8:14 AM Author: Plum disrespectful faggotry (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737948) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 8:16 AM Author: Grizzly trailer park You have my assurance (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737960) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 8:18 AM Author: Free-loading internet-worthy party of the first part potus Why is this better than “no sex before marriage”? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3803637&forum_id=2#34737972) |