what would the Confederate South be like today, if it had seceded
| fragrant fuchsia public bath | 11/21/17 | | Infuriating Locale | 11/21/17 | | Useless Brindle Fat Ankles | 11/21/17 | | carnelian galvanic old irish cottage | 11/21/17 | | passionate rigor | 11/21/17 | | Godawful Nudist Idiot | 11/21/17 | | big drunken ticket booth | 11/21/17 | | henna sanctuary | 11/21/17 | | Razzmatazz den coffee pot | 11/21/17 | | buff blood rage reading party | 11/21/17 | | Infuriating Locale | 11/21/17 | | big drunken ticket booth | 11/22/17 | | Curious office | 11/21/17 | | Nighttime sandwich nibblets | 11/21/17 | | 180 giraffe | 11/21/17 | | Infuriating Locale | 11/21/17 | | fragrant fuchsia public bath | 11/21/17 | | fluffy ratface whorehouse | 11/21/17 | | Infuriating Locale | 11/21/17 | | supple doobsian senate | 11/21/17 | | Curious office | 11/21/17 | | claret diverse piazza | 11/21/17 | | spectacular very tactful stain area | 11/21/17 | | Snowy national idea he suggested | 11/21/17 | | claret diverse piazza | 11/21/17 | | carnelian galvanic old irish cottage | 11/21/17 | | claret diverse piazza | 11/21/17 | | fragrant fuchsia public bath | 11/21/17 | | slimy elastic band mood | 11/22/17 | | out-of-control useless brakes faggotry | 11/21/17 | | big drunken ticket booth | 11/21/17 | | carnelian galvanic old irish cottage | 11/21/17 | | big drunken ticket booth | 11/21/17 | | carnelian galvanic old irish cottage | 11/21/17 | | claret diverse piazza | 11/21/17 | | Abusive excitant base newt | 11/22/17 | | razzle-dazzle maize business firm | 11/21/17 | | lascivious chapel | 11/21/17 | | henna sanctuary | 11/21/17 | | spectacular very tactful stain area | 11/22/17 | | slimy elastic band mood | 11/22/17 | | Sticky outnumbered address | 11/22/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 4:18 PM Author: Infuriating Locale
would be fucking off the chain.
we'd have lower taxes because we wouldn't have to subsidize the pitiful south.
we'd have a better economy, more sane laws.
major concern would be way less internal vacation spots. but it would be well worth it to not be associated with southern folk.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804905&forum_id=2#34741755) |
Date: November 21st, 2017 4:34 PM Author: Snowy national idea he suggested
If they had peacefully succeeded, probably pretty sweet considering the cotton trade accounted for something like 60% of the national GDP. My guess: The South would be in the economic/ military position that the US as a whole is in is today, with the northern states being like a second layer of Canada. EDIT: slavery eventually gets abolished and race relations are as peaceful as they are in Brazil.
If they had succeeded in '64 after much of their economy was destroyed and incurring the war debt, The South probably doesn't end up quite as well, but still much better than having to suffer through 30 years of military occupation, disenfranchisement, and reconstruction.
If we succeeded today, 180x180.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804905&forum_id=2#34741924) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 5:54 PM Author: big drunken ticket booth
You are fucking insane.
The South was dirt poor when it started the War. They couldn't even afford to give their Soldiers SHOES TO WEAR INTO BATTLE, let alone sustain their own population.
The South thought that Europe would have their back in the War because they thought "Cotton was King".
Europe said, "DINGFAG!" and got their cotton elsewhere, thus significantly decreasing the importance the region had.
You think the North would allow the South to just "peacefully" walk away with all of their shit still within their borders?
Then you still have the unresolved issue of expansion into the West. Would the North "peacefully" allow the South to expand its territory into the West without any fight?
What about global issues? Would the North & South agreed to support the same sides in WWI/WWII? What about the territories and bases the US gained as a result of the various global conflicts? Would the North just say, You can take the Philippines and all the oil it has! NBD"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804905&forum_id=2#34742723) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 6:00 PM Author: big drunken ticket booth
That guy is full of shit:
"The proof that this reason was not sincere is that the abolitionists spent millions in order to incite insurrections among the slaves, or to induce them to flee from their masters, but let them die of hunger because they were free, and gave them no opportunity for moral advancement."
Millions to incite insurrections?
So abolitionist spent millions on John Brown and Nat Turner?
lol!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804905&forum_id=2#34742773) |
|
|