The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
POLL: would you be in favor of racial segregation?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:38 PM Author: Bossy Bateful Sanctuary (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749579) |
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:40 PM Author: hot spectacular school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749596) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:52 PM Author: Pearl razzle-dazzle hissy fit macaca I'm in favor of repealing laws making it illegal to discriminate on the basis of race in the real estate context. Let people decide for themselves who they want to live with.
If a neighborhood wants to be explicitly white and not rent or sell to blacks or other minorities, that's their right. Same goes for all races.
This is the free market solution, not government imposed segregation. |
 |
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:55 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner this should be bumped next time some idiot asks "why won't minorities vote for Republicans? They're so tribal!" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749758) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:59 PM Author: cerebral grizzly parlour immigrant Does anyone here ever ask that? That's mid 2000s cuckservative logic. Politics are fundamentally tribal and always will be. Minorities will always vote in ethnotribal blocks. The goal is to get whites to do the same. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749794) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:00 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner it's asked on xo all the time, and the answer isn't tribalism, it's that Republicans fucking hate non-whites (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749805) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:01 PM Author: hot spectacular school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749817) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:02 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner you are such a weirdo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749844) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:03 PM Author: hot spectacular school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749854) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:05 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner thanks for proving my point (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749868) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:07 PM Author: hot spectacular school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749906) |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2017 4:36 AM Author: pearly plaza lettuce whose point is it you think was being proved here? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34754733) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:47 PM Author: unholy fluffy masturbator it really makes no difference whether they do or don't, though (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750309) |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2017 4:35 AM Author: pearly plaza lettuce maybe it's because non-whites are horribly violent animals? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34754730) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:00 PM Author: hot spectacular school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749809) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:04 PM Author: Wonderful scarlet incel (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749866) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:35 PM Author: Razzle cumskin (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750208) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:55 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor This is pretty dumb. So you'd rather live next door to methhead white trash than a black doctor? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749763) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:57 PM Author: hot spectacular school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749772) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:58 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor Not sure how that's relevant. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749782) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:59 PM Author: hot spectacular school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749800) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:00 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor I'm not sure how prices are relevant. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749812) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:01 PM Author: Wonderful scarlet incel (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749824) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:01 PM Author: up-to-no-good selfie mental disorder Please list the Asian socialists you know of (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749825) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:57 PM Author: Wonderful scarlet incel this is good keep going (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749776) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:58 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner racism isn't logical (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749781) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:58 PM Author: Bossy Bateful Sanctuary really dumb logic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749786) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:58 PM Author: gay pit karate yeah because that's the choice the landlord would have to make in the absence of regulation. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749790) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:01 PM Author: Pearl razzle-dazzle hissy fit macaca Nice strawman.
Reread what I said. A property owner should have the right to decide who he wants to sell or rent to. If a group of people want to live in a neighborhood of a particular race, that should also be their right.
If you don't like it, don't move to that neighborhood. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:03 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor That can already be done with ease unless you're poor. What you're proposing would only be helping poor whites since there are thousands of middle class areas that are predominantly white across America. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749851) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:04 PM Author: Pearl razzle-dazzle hissy fit macaca Not officially.
And the government goes after property owners for not renting to blacks all the time. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:06 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor I can't see how refusing to rent SOLELY on the basis of race is justifiable. You need more than that to show said individual(s) are not suitable.
"Well, your skin is dark, so therefore, I refuse to rent this property to you." |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:07 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner he's a racist aspie who's afraid of people who are different from him
he doesn't need further justification |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:09 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor I mean, if he's a hardcore racist, that's fine, but him trying to justify blatant discrimination SOLELY based on race is ridiculous. I can understand possibly discriminating against those under a certain age, below a certain income, a poor rental track record, criminal record, etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749931) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:10 PM Author: Ultramarine codepig lodge /*\ DISPARATE IMPACT ALERT /*\ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749942) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:11 PM Author: hot spectacular school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749953) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:12 PM Author: Wonderful scarlet incel (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749963) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:27 PM Author: Bossy Bateful Sanctuary (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750103) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:10 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner yes, he's just a weird racist
nothing more to see, move along |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:09 PM Author: Pearl razzle-dazzle hissy fit macaca No, you don't "need" to show anything.
It is your property and you should have the right to sell or rent it as you see fit. The government should not be interfering with private property ownership in pursuit of social engineering. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:10 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor How's it social engineering if a black or Mexican doctor making $275k a yr wants to buy a property in a predominately white neighborhood? That person clearly has the funds and should rightfully be able to purchase such property.
Just say you hate blacks or whatever because there are plenty of ways to keep certain undesirables out of a neighborhood without race getting involved. The most obvious being the price of the property. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:15 PM Author: hot spectacular school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749993) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:17 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor It's not social engineering. In most suburban areas, neighbors barely know each other.
Social engineering is when government makes it possible for those who normally wouldn't be able to move into certain neighborhoods move there. However, a white collar professional with an income comparable to everyone else in the neighborhood looking to buy or rent isn't social engineering. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:17 PM Author: Pearl razzle-dazzle hissy fit macaca It is social engineering for the government to intervene and forcibly impose limits on who you can sell or rent your property to, in an attempt to create more integration.
If you are renting out your apartment, it's your money on the line. That's enough incentive not to rent to trash of any race. If you want to further prefer to rent to your race, that should be your right.
Likewise, the free market will ensure that a black or Mexican doctor making $275k will be able to purchase property. I'm sure there are plenty of property owners who would be happy to find such a buyer, including many whites. But if a white guy is faced with such a buyer and choose not to sell, holding out for a white who can afford his property, that should also be his right. He's the one hurt if he can't find a white buyer.
I'm not saying that every white should exclude every black. Just that every race should have the right to choose who they sell or rent to, because they face the consequences. The government has no right intruding on private property ownership as they do. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:20 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor What you're talking about is when the government makes it possible for certain individuals, who otherwise wouldn't have the funds, to move into certain areas. What I'm talking about is a black or Mexican white collar professional who clearly has an income comparable to everyone else in the area. In that case, that person should be permitted to buy or rent in that area regardless of race. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750043) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:28 PM Author: Pearl razzle-dazzle hissy fit macaca No, this is another strawman of yours. I'm not talking about Section 8 housing.
I'm talking about two distinct concepts:
1. A property owner currently cannot turn down applicants on the basis of race. Section 8 is a subset, but take that out of the picture and the prohibition remains.
2. Neighborhoods cannot be created explicitly designed for a particular race.
Both prohibitions/restrictions on private property ownership should be abolished, for the reasons just described. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:33 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor There's a reason why discrimination solely based on race is not permitted: because it's not necessary to weed out undesirables. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750187) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:36 PM Author: Pearl razzle-dazzle hissy fit macaca You've got it backwards:
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&mc=99&forum_id=2#34750211 |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 5:39 PM Author: Poppy Orchestra Pit so lawman8 is in favor of enforcing the tens of thousands of development covenants all over the nation that specifically say only white people can live in X neighborhood?
LOL man, don't start conflating you neckbeard 'principles' with how life moves on the ground. giving private citizens the ability to discriminate based on race for shit like housing is a terrible idea for a dozen different reasons that i won't even bother detailing. i have some openly racist leanings due to sheer personal interest that I'm willing to cop to, but only 110 IQs seriously think the shit you're advocating for is 1) feasible, and 2) anything other than a terrible idea for all parties and interests. |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2017 10:10 AM Author: Citrine curious generalized bond Always a pumo. Oh what an openly racist! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34755316) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:18 PM Author: Concupiscible rusted center windowlicker absent any other information that is evidence that the "person" is many times more more likely to commit a violent crime against him (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750026) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:21 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor ?
You need more than skin color if you're going to discriminate. If you're so adamant about said person being a danger, you can start digging for criminal records, poor rental history, poor job history, etc.
Just admit you're lazy and would rather just look and say "ugh...BLACKS!" than actually do any research to at least try to justify why they shouldn't be there. Also, if you're worried about criminals moving in next door or up the street, you may want to improve your income situation as your concerns are pretty much the concerns that lower income folks have. I don't know of anyone solidly middle/upper middle class who has had issues with dangerous people moving in next door or up the street; it's only been folks with little money complaining. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:29 PM Author: Pearl razzle-dazzle hissy fit macaca You don't "need" to explain anything if you are a private property owner. That's the point which keeps going way over your head. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750127) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:31 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor My point is there's no reason to discriminate solely based on race since other factors will almost always weed out those who would make lousy homeowners/renters.
You're just racist and therefore desperate to exercise your racism whenever possible just because. You haven't provided one good reason why discriminating solely on the basis of race is necessary. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:36 PM Author: Pearl razzle-dazzle hissy fit macaca And if that's the case, removing the prohibitions on discriminating based on race shouldn't have much of an impact.
We don't start from the standpoint of having government restrictions on private property ownership, removing them only if there's a valid reason. We start with a hands off approach, only imposing such prohibitions if there's an incredibly compelling reason.
You've got the order backwards, and since even you concede what I advocate won't make much of a practical impact (aside from giving the owner more choice), the prohibitions should be removed. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:37 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor No, it shouldn't be removed because there are people, such as yourself, who would definitely refuse to sell/rent to certain individuals solely because you don't like their skin color or ethnic background.
People have proven over and over that when the govt doesn't impose certain laws, people will do whatever they want regardless of whether or not their actions are justified out of pure hatred. That's exactly when removing prohibitions should not be done....the average person can't be trusted to act responsibly. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:40 PM Author: Pearl razzle-dazzle hissy fit macaca Then people like me would be hurt because it would take longer to find a suitable buyer or renter.
Face it, you want to impose totalitarian tendencies on people you don't agree with (racists) in an attempt to force them to do what you want. There's no other reason to advocate for these prohibitions which even you concede aren't very effective. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:41 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor Look, come up with a legitimate reason why you need such prohibitions removed, aside from blatant racism. You're looking for actions to take place despite being having no positive affect other than you being able to move forward with your racial agenda.
If you can't come up with something beyond "I HATE NIGGERS", there's nothing more to discuss. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:43 PM Author: Pearl razzle-dazzle hissy fit macaca How dumb are you?
I already explained that you are reversing the burden. It's not my burden to come up with a legitimate reason to remove a ridiculous restriction on private property ownership.
It's your burden to demonstrate why the prohibitions should be imposed to begin with. So far, you've failed miserably, essentially conceding there AREN'T any reasons since people won't follow them anyway. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:45 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor I told you why such protections are needed: those who can rightfully afford to move into certain areas shouldn't be cut off from doing so solely because YOU don't like their race. That's what America is about: FREEDOM & LIBERTY & JUSTICE FOR ALL.
By you removing such prohibitions, you're doing away with freedom and liberty for no legitimate reason....and hating "niggers" isn't a legitimate reason. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:47 PM Author: Pearl razzle-dazzle hissy fit macaca No, you already admitted the protections are not needed since people will come up with pretexts and discriminate anyway.
I also explained that many of people would buy or rent to a black doctor making $275k anyway. Your notion that removing the prohibitions would result in such a person being blocked out of nice areas is unfounded speculation.
You are restricting the freedom of private property owners to utilize their property for no legitimate reason. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:50 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor Americans are not responsible enough to exercise good judgment without laws being put in place. That's why laws exists in the first place.
Sure, if you could guarantee that everyone in America would exercise objectively good judgment, then doing away with prohibitions would be fine...but that's not the case. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:53 PM Author: Pearl razzle-dazzle hissy fit macaca I maintain that you've got it entirely backwards, but we've both fully explained our positions at this point. Probably not much more that can be accomplished. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750362) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:54 PM Author: flesh racy school cafeteria rigor I don't have it backwards; I just don't believe Americans will exercise good judgment without having someone (ie govt) looking over their shoulder at all times. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750371) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:56 PM Author: Bossy Bateful Sanctuary (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749769) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:53 PM Author: Wonderful scarlet incel No. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749742) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:56 PM Author: Cream glittery office reading party Not government imposed. I'm against government power.
BUT, the government also should not STOP people from self-segregating.
EG. Racial restrictive covenants shuold be legal and enforceable. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:56 PM Author: Soul-stirring ebony voyeur yes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749768) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:58 PM Author: cerebral grizzly parlour immigrant I'd support the establishment of ethnostates + population exchanges similar to the ones after WW1. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749780) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:01 PM Author: Cream glittery office reading party (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749818) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:58 PM Author: Talented depressive business firm repeal the civil rights act and we're good (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749785) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:59 PM Author: sinister area therapy lol. this is basically what lawman8 wants. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749804) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:07 PM Author: Talented depressive business firm it's pretty widely understood among non-leftist intellectuals that the civil rights act has been an explicit disaster for the USA
normal (white) people have never read through what the legislation actually does. they've just been fed decades of propaganda and assume that it must have "helped stop racism" or something equally vague, nebulous, and inaccurate |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:08 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749913) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:12 PM Author: Talented depressive business firm what is the max IQ to unironically think that private citizens exercising arbitrary discrimination based on *anything* is inherently bad?
like 103?
have you ever independently thought about this subject matter for more than 30-40 seconds? |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:15 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner I'm laughing at your assertion that it's "widely understood" that the civil rights act has been a "disaster"" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749995) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:19 PM Author: Pearl razzle-dazzle hissy fit macaca Blue Smoke's IQ is assuredly below 100, so don't be surprised by her responses here.
Here's proof:
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3727466&mc=29&forum_id=2 |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:21 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner lol I have at least 20 IQ points on you
you are the board laughingstock on a board full of people who agree with you politically
LJL |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:23 PM Author: hot spectacular school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750071) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:24 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner she may be
we are both smarter than you and lawman |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:14 PM Author: territorial laughsome affirmative action tanning salon So what does the legislation "actually" do then brother? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749983) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:23 PM Author: Talented depressive business firm social engineering that has led to extremely undesirable consequences (for everyone, even the people that the legislation was ostensibly supposed to help) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750073) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:30 PM Author: Cream glittery office reading party (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750146) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 2:58 PM Author: translucent set i want all blacks that make less than 100k liquidated. so yes, in a sense, i am for racial segregation. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749792) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:00 PM Author: sinister area therapy what about whites that make less than 100k? How about asians? Would it be 150k for them? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749810) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:02 PM Author: Wonderful scarlet incel Asians will have the content of their brains downloaded and their organs harvested. The rest of their matter will be chopped and ground into a fine paste and sold as dog food. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749841) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:00 PM Author: Wonderful scarlet incel like put them all in a blender? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749811) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:02 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner why only blacks who make less than 100k? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749830) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:03 PM Author: translucent set because not only are they poor, they are also black. you cant be both, thats too much suck. they gotta go in a blender. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749849) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:05 PM Author: sinister area therapy describe your IRL personality (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749869) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:06 PM Author: translucent set timid, shy, lecherous, quiet, abrasive, offputting, beta. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749883) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:08 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner how surprising (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749921) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:09 PM Author: translucent set i saw your pictures. u are a 2. settle down. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749936) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:11 PM Author: Wonderful scarlet incel (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749958) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:11 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner sorry I don't accept ratings from non-Chad self-proclaimed aspie betas
why would I care what you think? |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:15 PM Author: hot spectacular school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749997) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:18 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner not good enough (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750027) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:42 PM Author: Cream glittery office reading party I'm a chad and I like you (even though I don't like your shilibbery in this thread).
If it's legal for you to choose to not fuck a guy because he's not a chad, it should be legal for me to choose to not rent to a person because he's a Mestizo subhuman. |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:46 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner ty
it's ok Chad>>>politics |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:05 PM Author: Insecure buff space yes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749871) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:11 PM Author: slap-happy university Poasting in a thread that costs some politician a job in 2034 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34749956) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:22 PM Author: cerebral grizzly parlour immigrant cr
anyone cucking on the race question ITT will be barred from office in the ethnostate |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:24 PM Author: hot spectacular school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750081) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:28 PM Author: Bossy Bateful Sanctuary CR lmao (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750116) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:22 PM Author: Wonderful scarlet incel imagine if bluesmoke becomes president and all of XO is archived and ends up in a museum (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750061) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:24 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner I never say racist things so I would be fine (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750086) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:26 PM Author: Wonderful scarlet incel *gives you a "NOT RACIST" sticker* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750099) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:28 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner ty
I wear it proudly
I also never say sexist or homophobic things
I am an outted poster and I don't have to hide behind everything I say like a little bitch
meanwhile the xo racists would NEVER have the guts to say any of this stuff IRL because they're punks |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 6:45 PM Author: Wonderful scarlet incel alright now you're getting autistic plz stop gook (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34751864) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:22 PM Author: frisky sadistic corner yea I'm sure lawman and tedcruz have the charisma to get people to vote for them (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750066) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:21 PM Author: Big bisexual locus I'm in favor of freedom of association, including race-based private covenants running with the land, etc. We get this de facto but at much higher cost; might as well restore the traditional balance. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750056) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:30 PM Author: Cream glittery office reading party (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750149) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:25 PM Author: Concupiscible rusted center windowlicker complete freedom of association incentivization of traditional families pre-1965 immigration policy defund all non-stem faculites in universities |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:27 PM Author: Talented depressive business firm (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750104) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:31 PM Author: Cream glittery office reading party (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750151) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:31 PM Author: Pearl razzle-dazzle hissy fit macaca (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750155) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:31 PM Author: Big bisexual locus CR except why fund universities at all. If there are worthy stem projects we can fund them piecemeal and through a bidding process. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750164) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:36 PM Author: Cream glittery office reading party (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750220) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 5:40 PM Author: charcoal public bath I was going to attack this suggestion but given twins the poster's stature I am willing to seriously consider its feasibility (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34751342) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 7:01 PM Author: Bossy Bateful Sanctuary (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34752012) |
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 3:40 PM Author: translucent set (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34750249) |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2017 4:36 AM Author: thriller plum foreskin no (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34754735) |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2017 1:13 PM Author: Bossy Bateful Sanctuary yes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805948&forum_id=2#34756360) |