--

The good people of this great country earnestly tried to be as open-minded and progressive as any society in history.

We wanted to live in a colorblind society. When I was growing up in the 90s, everyone took MLK's dream seriously. We were willing to put aside prejudice and race and embrace diversity. Many of our biggest celebrities were POCs. We even elected a black president in a majority-white country. But that was not enough.

We wanted to live in an accepting society, so we normalized homosexuality, and even made gay marriage legal. But that was not enough. We wanted to give equal rights to women, so women now outnumber men in universities, and millennial women make more per capita than millennial men. But that was not enough.

We wanted to be multicultural, so we accepted "pressing 1" for English, embraced all sorts of cultures, and removed preferential immigration policies. But that was not enough.

It has become clear that no matter what we do, it will never be enough. You won't stop until the world burns. Fuck libs.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3822211&forum_id=2#34870767)

they failed.

they are mad.

they are bitter.

Also there's a lot of meth addled stormfront weirdos who migrated here who were always right wing.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3822211&forum_id=2#34872523)

FTFY

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3822211&forum_id=2#34872554)

I wonder what Obama's primary opponent in 2008 and Trump's election opponent in 2016 might have in common

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3822211&forum_id=2#34879133)

obama was going against neocon idiot john mccain and offered a fresh start after the disastrous W presidency.

trump boldly rejected the failed repuiblican positions of the past, and was going up against historically awful candidate hillary clinton

it's not that strange. more strange to me that so many obama voters would line up behind clinton without questioning her policies

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3822211&forum_id=2#34878761)

also 2008 obama seemed to represent a genuinely post racial society where everybody was unified against racism/discrimination not post 2012 obama/shitlibbery where racism was redefined to exclude hostility/discrimination towards whites while openly agitating for open borders and erasure of american history and culture

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3822211&forum_id=2#34878874)

The road of guilt has led modern liberals to an absurd extreme where they toss out what used to be common sense ideas about due process and considering all the facts in the name of a "larger truth." They're desperate to validate their insane view that whites are responsible for all black suffering, and they refuse to accept that black culture is messed up on any level and needs correcting. Furthermore, they concoct all kinds of narratives to support this larger truth.

The Zimmerman case is a classic example of the creation of a narrative to support the larger truth. It was painted as a white man shooting down an unarmed black boy in a gated neighborhood. This clearly fit the larger truth that racism and racial profiling is still a problem and whites are to blame. But then the truth came out - the man wasn't white - he was of mixed race with African, Amerindian, White, and Jewish heritage. The "boy" would be old enough to be tried as an adult for serious crimes. Moreover the gated neighborhood they lived in wasn't upper class and filled with blueblood white aristocrats as insinuated but rather a comically diverse middle class subdivision that had previous crime issues. Not to mention that the shooter was acting in self defense and had wounds and witnesses to corroborate his side of the story. The narrative failed yet liberals still are convinced that it was murder in order to play to the larger truth at hand rather than the actual truth that occurred.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3822211&forum_id=2#34878922)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3822211&forum_id=2#34878948)

I noticed this shift during the Trayvon Martin trial. I had nominally anti-death penalty, pro pacifist liberals I knew advocating for the death penalty, and when that failed, outright vigilante style murder to avenge Trayvon's death. Same thing with the campus rape stuff: all of a sudden due process doesn't matter. Same wit hfree speech, anti-violence, etc.

tldr version: There's no right and left here. There's two authoritarian, quasi-fascist groups who are trying to go after different demographics.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3822211&forum_id=2#34878985)

the behavior you are perplexed by becomes clear when you realize this. right wing fascism/alt-right is a REACTION to this shitlibbery and the best way to neutralize the alt-right is for libs to step away from the abyss and return to traditional liberal principles where the dividing line was class/labor/government than race/culture

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3822211&forum_id=2#34879075)

this was already happening a little after 9/11 (see Patty Murray), to me it is where the left’s slide into insanity really began, too much cognitive dissonance for them to handle

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3822211&forum_id=2#34879109)

its a numbers game and rate of minority population growth far outpaces rate of whites getting red pilled. not to mention that libs 100% control academia and culturally significant occupations/industries

it won't be as bad as zimbabwe simply because the elites will still need white creativity, productivity to run our economy and also because whites will have some demographic power even if they are a minority. but say goodbye to 1st amendment, 2nd amendment, immigration enforcement and say hello to quasi racial quotas, permanent reparations through our tax system, blatant historical revisionism and zero tolerance and severe punishment for non conformity on matters of race/diversity

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3822211&forum_id=2#34879240)