The Giancarlo trade was TTT in the long run for the Yankees
| Cerise indirect expression public bath | 12/11/17 | | Exciting Den | 12/11/17 | | zippy frisky round eye windowlicker | 12/11/17 | | Exciting Den | 12/11/17 | | 180 karate puppy | 12/11/17 | | Exciting Den | 12/11/17 | | 180 karate puppy | 12/11/17 | | hyperactive racy black woman university | 12/11/17 | | 180 karate puppy | 12/11/17 | | hyperactive racy black woman university | 12/11/17 | | Exciting Den | 12/11/17 | | hyperactive racy black woman university | 12/11/17 | | Exciting Den | 12/11/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: December 11th, 2017 4:08 PM Author: zippy frisky round eye windowlicker
Stanton had 1 fully healthy season
His defense is worse than harper's
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3825016&forum_id=2#34892071) |
|
Date: December 11th, 2017 4:19 PM Author: 180 karate puppy
stanton is not better than either
it makes sense for the yankees b/c they're probably getting him at a slight discount to what the highest bidder would pay for giancarlo today when you take the money they're getting back into account, and b/c of how close they are to a championship. and b/c it might allow them to not have to spend a shitton on machado or harper when they're available. either could go for like 35-45% more on an annual basis than what the yankees will be paying giancarlo on average.
regardless the contract itself was a shitty contract when the marlins signed it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3825016&forum_id=2#34892177) |
|
|