The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Any good somewhat objective primers on Net Neutrality? Libs melting down on SM
| hyperventilating yellow brunch degenerate | 12/15/17 |
| Amethyst irradiated gas station | 12/15/17 |
| 180 travel guidebook | 12/15/17 |
| jet-lagged provocative hall immigrant | 12/15/17 |
| lemon comical orchestra pit circlehead | 12/15/17 |
| Aphrodisiac domesticated dog poop | 12/15/17 |
| jet-lagged provocative hall immigrant | 12/15/17 |
| Low-t cruise ship laser beams | 12/15/17 |
| passionate opaque principal's office athletic conference | 12/15/17 |
| jet-lagged provocative hall immigrant | 12/15/17 |
| Aphrodisiac domesticated dog poop | 12/15/17 |
| at-the-ready misunderstood codepig point | 12/15/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 15th, 2017 4:15 AM Author: hyperventilating yellow brunch degenerate I am woefully uninformed on this topic and all I see are hysterical libs melting down over NN on my social media feeds. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34925052) |
Date: December 15th, 2017 4:38 PM Author: Amethyst irradiated gas station https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRF36EaVoAIqqtB.jpg:large (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929264) |
 |
Date: December 15th, 2017 4:39 PM Author: 180 travel guidebook (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929271) |
|
Date: December 15th, 2017 4:39 PM Author: jet-lagged provocative hall immigrant If libs are melting down you know it’s fucking horseshit.
Not even being flip. I firmly believe this. |
|
Date: December 15th, 2017 4:41 PM Author: lemon comical orchestra pit circlehead (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929294) |
|
Date: December 15th, 2017 5:16 PM Author: Aphrodisiac domesticated dog poop (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929573) |
|
Date: December 15th, 2017 5:17 PM Author: jet-lagged provocative hall immigrant (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929577) |
|
Date: December 15th, 2017 5:18 PM Author: Low-t cruise ship laser beams (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929585) |
|
Date: December 15th, 2017 5:17 PM Author: passionate opaque principal's office athletic conference This should tell you all you need to know
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/soros-ford-foundation-shovel-196-million-to-net-neutrality-groups-staff-to-white-house/article/2560702 |
|
Date: December 15th, 2017 5:18 PM Author: jet-lagged provocative hall immigrant (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929582) |
|
Date: December 15th, 2017 5:20 PM Author: Aphrodisiac domesticated dog poop do you want private companies like comcast blocking based on bandwidth usage or do you want the federal government blocking based on content? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3829834&forum_id=2#34929596) |
|
Date: December 15th, 2017 5:20 PM Author: at-the-ready misunderstood codepig point https://www.allsides.com/story/fcc-votes-overturn-net-neutrality-regulations
From the right: The level of panic set off by the end of net neutrality is utterly out of proportion to the actual effect that end is likely to have. The basic debate over net neutrality is actually a reasonable one: is the best way to ensure a better internet for consumers to ban internet service providers (ISPs) from charging certain content providers more for their use of bandwidth than others, or is it to free ISPs to charge what they want, thereby incentivizing ISPs to compete with one another to offer different services at different prices?
On the one hand, there are those who argue that the current ISP oligopoly that exists in many areas of the country must be curbed to prevent monopolistic practices; on the other hand, there are those who argue that regulating ISPs as public utilities prevents new, small ISPs from entering the market, and stops current oligopoly beneficiaries from investing in new technology to forestall such competition. Ajit Pai, current head of the FCC, argues that “among our nation’s 12 largest Internet service providers, domestic broadband capital expenditures decreased by 5.6%, or $3.6 billion, between 2014 and 2016, the first two years of the Title II era.” For making this point, Pai has been subjected to serious threats to safety.
This is a reasonable debate. Here’s what’s not reasonable: the suggestion that your internet use is likely to change radically from what it was in 2015, before net neutrality went into effect. Here’s what else isn’t reasonable: people of the Left who think that Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter operate fine in the free market, and that consumers don’t have to worry about discrimination thanks to open competition, but that the same doesn’t apply to ISPs. |