The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
When Trump fires mueller what are the chances of congress passing veto proof
| fuchsia concupiscible chad | 12/15/17 |
| Coiffed Disrespectful Chapel Philosopher-king | 12/15/17 |
| Coiffed Disrespectful Chapel Philosopher-king | 12/15/17 |
| Wild ungodly center wagecucks | 12/15/17 |
| aphrodisiac buck-toothed tanning salon | 12/15/17 |
| fuchsia concupiscible chad | 12/15/17 |
| aphrodisiac buck-toothed tanning salon | 04/10/18 |
| well-lubricated domesticated fortuitous meteor | 04/10/18 |
| 180 frum base halford | 04/10/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 15th, 2017 6:46 PM Author: fuchsia concupiscible chad special counsel law and appointing its own special counsel? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#34930224) |
Date: December 15th, 2017 6:51 PM Author: Coiffed Disrespectful Chapel Philosopher-king Wouldn't that be unconstitutional? E.g., INS v. Chadha. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#34930244) |
 |
Date: December 15th, 2017 6:59 PM Author: Coiffed Disrespectful Chapel Philosopher-king To make this stronger, _Morrison v. Olson_ strongly suggests, or even mandates, this _would_ be unconstitutional. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#34930296) |
|
Date: December 15th, 2017 6:52 PM Author: Wild ungodly center wagecucks When? I don't think he will, otherwise he would have already done it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#34930249) |
|
Date: December 15th, 2017 6:54 PM Author: aphrodisiac buck-toothed tanning salon It would be an act of utter desperation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#34930262) |
|
Date: December 15th, 2017 6:57 PM Author: fuchsia concupiscible chad no inside info but I am guessing that there may be a small chance (< 10%) after tax reform is signed (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#34930282) |
|
Date: April 10th, 2018 10:25 AM Author: aphrodisiac buck-toothed tanning salon (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#35806159) |
|
Date: April 10th, 2018 10:27 AM Author: well-lubricated domesticated fortuitous meteor Sounds unconstitutional (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#35806174) |
|
Date: April 10th, 2018 10:28 AM Author: 180 frum base halford they actually don't even need to do that. all congress has to do to negate mueller's firing is subpoena him to testify before congress about everything his investigation found (same thing he was going to do anyway) and any crimes he found would just get prosecuted by ordinary US attorneys.
the FBI would also likely continue the investigation (remember, it started as an fbi investigation and muller was appointed specifically to continue the investigation that comey confirmed to congress was taking place) and any additional evidence the FBI finds would get referred to federal prosecutors |