\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

When Trump fires mueller what are the chances of congress passing veto proof

special counsel law and appointing its own special counsel?
indecent field candlestick maker
  12/15/17
Wouldn't that be unconstitutional? E.g., INS v. Chadha.
citrine marvelous set
  12/15/17
To make this stronger, _Morrison v. Olson_ strongly suggests...
citrine marvelous set
  12/15/17
When? I don't think he will, otherwise he would have already...
Bat-shit-crazy home
  12/15/17
It would be an act of utter desperation
Galvanic shaky hominid
  12/15/17
no inside info but I am guessing that there may be a small c...
indecent field candlestick maker
  12/15/17
...
Galvanic shaky hominid
  04/10/18
Sounds unconstitutional
rose racy round eye
  04/10/18
they actually don't even need to do that. all congress has t...
Vengeful mexican
  04/10/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 6:46 PM
Author: indecent field candlestick maker

special counsel law and appointing its own special counsel?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#34930224)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 6:51 PM
Author: citrine marvelous set

Wouldn't that be unconstitutional? E.g., INS v. Chadha.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#34930244)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 6:59 PM
Author: citrine marvelous set

To make this stronger, _Morrison v. Olson_ strongly suggests, or even mandates, this _would_ be unconstitutional.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#34930296)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 6:52 PM
Author: Bat-shit-crazy home

When? I don't think he will, otherwise he would have already done it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#34930249)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 6:54 PM
Author: Galvanic shaky hominid

It would be an act of utter desperation

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#34930262)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 15th, 2017 6:57 PM
Author: indecent field candlestick maker

no inside info but I am guessing that there may be a small chance (< 10%) after tax reform is signed

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#34930282)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 10th, 2018 10:25 AM
Author: Galvanic shaky hominid



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#35806159)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 10th, 2018 10:27 AM
Author: rose racy round eye

Sounds unconstitutional

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#35806174)



Reply Favorite

Date: April 10th, 2018 10:28 AM
Author: Vengeful mexican

they actually don't even need to do that. all congress has to do to negate mueller's firing is subpoena him to testify before congress about everything his investigation found (same thing he was going to do anyway) and any crimes he found would just get prosecuted by ordinary US attorneys.

the FBI would also likely continue the investigation (remember, it started as an fbi investigation and muller was appointed specifically to continue the investigation that comey confirmed to congress was taking place) and any additional evidence the FBI finds would get referred to federal prosecutors

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3830483&forum_id=2#35806192)