\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Trump lawyer: Mueller improperly obtained transition documents in Russia probe

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/16/trump-lawyer-muel...
Fragrant water buffalo menage
  12/16/17
I predicted some time ago that Mueller would lose his law li...
irradiated stead degenerate
  12/16/17
what are your credentials, other than being a retard?
Rusted national liquid oxygen
  12/16/17
...
Contagious Awkward Haunted Graveyard
  12/16/17
he's a harvard law grad
talking sick tanning salon
  12/16/17
caltech UG if i remember correctly
lemon macaca
  12/16/17
Odd that he’s saying retarded shit
Rusted national liquid oxygen
  12/16/17
...
Racy incel
  12/16/17
you are talking to a Caltech UG
lemon macaca
  12/16/17
...
flesh supple dingle berry
  12/16/17
...
soul-stirring glassy temple private investor
  12/16/17
and therefore an expert on lolyer ethics?
Rusted national liquid oxygen
  12/17/17
one of the finest law schools in the country
Beady-eyed resort associate
  12/17/17
Joe?
galvanic mahogany public bath
  12/18/17
cr
domesticated indecent location
  12/16/17
Shut it down
flesh supple dingle berry
  12/16/17
need WLMAS to explain how this guy is upholding the rule of ...
Purple stirring azn nursing home
  12/16/17
he sent a subpoena. GSA responded to it. you want to tell me...
curious jade sweet tailpipe
  12/16/17
According to letter just released, there was no subpoena. Ju...
Boyish theater
  12/16/17
weird how that pumo just vanished all the sudden
soul-stirring glassy temple private investor
  12/16/17
...
domesticated indecent location
  12/16/17
...
alcoholic depressive field
  12/17/17
If there was no sunpoena and just a letter then thats even m...
curious jade sweet tailpipe
  12/17/17
Succinct rejoinder of this retard
Multi-colored national security agency famous landscape painting
  12/17/17
...
aphrodisiac amber dilemma trump supporter
  12/18/17
This used to be a law bort.
Multi-colored national security agency famous landscape painting
  12/17/17
The 4th Amendment. Jesus.
Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage
  12/17/17
...
Multi-colored national security agency famous landscape painting
  12/17/17
...
talking sick tanning salon
  12/17/17
...
unhinged meetinghouse nibblets
  12/16/17
lol good luck with that argument
curious jade sweet tailpipe
  12/16/17
Jesus
soul-stirring glassy temple private investor
  12/16/17
4 indictments and counting trumpfags tick tok tick tok
curious jade sweet tailpipe
  12/16/17
Lol
Arousing bistre potus casino
  12/16/17
I’m with you, brother! I can’t wait for the uranium 1 indict...
provocative brilliant nowag
  12/16/17
Even if there's a legal argument to be made here, do Trump p...
Heady clear dopamine
  12/16/17
lol are these the same people who argued that Hillary destro...
soul-stirring glassy temple private investor
  12/16/17
No. The same people who claimed it was bad for Hillary to de...
Chest-beating new version
  12/16/17
so the same people who thought it was NBD for Hillary to aci...
soul-stirring glassy temple private investor
  12/16/17
Bleach bit and sledge hammer to old Blackberries, which appa...
provocative brilliant nowag
  12/17/17
What's good for the goose...
sapphire telephone double fault
  12/17/17
without a subpoena or warrant? Hell yes
Boyish theater
  12/16/17
...
Geriatric shrine
  12/16/17
Libs?
spectacular brethren
  12/16/17
sounds like the problem lies with trump's ARE gsa
hyperactive property love of her life
  12/19/17
tick tock trumpcucks
talking sick tanning salon
  12/16/17
...
flesh supple dingle berry
  12/16/17
...
unhinged meetinghouse nibblets
  12/17/17
Jesus, the fourth amendment.
domesticated indecent location
  12/16/17
...
Multi-colored national security agency famous landscape painting
  12/17/17
...
talking sick tanning salon
  12/17/17
Need JJC, Obeezy, or Rockapotamus to explain how this advanc...
Ultramarine School Cafeteria Turdskin
  12/17/17
Libs?
Ultramarine School Cafeteria Turdskin
  12/17/17
oddly silent
misunderstood motley stage
  12/17/17
Remember, only libs have civil liberties. It’s their men’s r...
provocative brilliant nowag
  12/17/17
I'm not even sure what the Trumpcuck crowing is about. Is th...
Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage
  12/17/17
1) if anybody did anything wrong, it sounds like it was the ...
aphrodisiac amber dilemma trump supporter
  12/18/17
They sound worried
maroon confused kitchen
  12/17/17
The Trumpcucks in this thread or the authors of this hilario...
Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage
  12/17/17
Both brother
maroon confused kitchen
  12/17/17
So he asked for some documents, someone gave them to him, an...
Multi-colored national security agency famous landscape painting
  12/17/17
You've clearly never hired your own counsel with whom you've...
provocative brilliant nowag
  12/17/17
I have, but let's assume the GSA had ACP with the TTT, how d...
Multi-colored national security agency famous landscape painting
  12/17/17
Meuller fucked up twice: 1) no Chinese wall, and 2) failed t...
provocative brilliant nowag
  12/17/17
If they are using a GSA server, not a fucking letter is priv...
concupiscible set
  12/17/17
Love dat reading comprehension. They aren't government recor...
provocative brilliant nowag
  12/17/17
It's no different than speaking to your lawyer with a third ...
concupiscible set
  12/17/17
lol sure buddy, dat privacy notice trumps everything. Which ...
provocative brilliant nowag
  12/17/17
"dat privacy notice trumps everything" actually...
hyperactive property love of her life
  12/19/17
You cannot just eliminate waiver by claiming the materials a...
Outnumbered disrespectful juggernaut dragon
  12/17/17
Risten
Glittery Internal Respiration
  12/17/17
not a crim bro - can someone lay out what the issues are her...
Rusted national liquid oxygen
  12/17/17
No fourth amendment issue. Mueller asked for something and g...
Big Puppy Trust Fund
  12/17/17
who the fuck wrote this letter?
Rusted national liquid oxygen
  12/17/17
Matthew Peterson
Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage
  12/17/17
...
Multi-colored national security agency famous landscape painting
  12/17/17
It sounds like (((FoxNews))) is juicing the contents of the ...
Multi-colored national security agency famous landscape painting
  12/17/17
I agree no forth amendment issue, but the privilege issue is...
costumed locus
  12/17/17
In that case, third-party vendor is an agent of counsel, cli...
Big Puppy Trust Fund
  12/17/17
that was my reaction. it would seem that the documents were ...
Rusted national liquid oxygen
  12/17/17
Yeah, I think there's law to the effect that even if you han...
Big Puppy Trust Fund
  12/17/17
They didn't "hand over" documents to the GSA. The...
costumed locus
  12/17/17
This is basically the point of the letter. The GSA is suppo...
costumed locus
  12/17/17
the pumos squawking itt are the same ones who still bleat ab...
soul-stirring glassy temple private investor
  12/17/17
Specifically, Loewentritt said, "in using our devices,&...
Big Puppy Trust Fund
  12/17/17
Interesting twist then if that is in agreements with the GSA...
costumed locus
  12/17/17
lol what are you talking about. it is extremely common for d...
Snowy Circlehead
  12/17/17
I'm not sure what your point is. Documents are routinely ho...
costumed locus
  12/17/17
lol let's resume this when you graduate from law school
Snowy Circlehead
  12/17/17
Sure, as soon as you finish your 12-step program. ;)
costumed locus
  12/17/17
what's that supposed to mean. bro, you gotta stop crediting...
Snowy Circlehead
  12/17/17
I'm not crediting it entirely. I already said that: 1) I di...
costumed locus
  12/17/17
stop babbling about potential ethical issues and either cite...
Snowy Circlehead
  12/17/17
I cited the ethics rules in another thread this morning. Lo...
costumed locus
  12/17/17
what is with the alcohol references. i'm not going to cha...
Snowy Circlehead
  12/17/17
LOL, I feel bad for anyone that seeks legal advice from you.
costumed locus
  12/17/17
Laughably dumb. Google could give police/FBI/etc your gma...
concupiscible set
  12/17/17
"Look up the case law involving Gmail, Apple, or any ot...
Violet Legal Warrant Spot
  12/18/17
titc analysis
aphrodisiac amber dilemma trump supporter
  12/18/17
See the ninth circuit decision in in re grand jury subpoena ...
slap-happy ocher lodge clown
  12/17/17
GJ sub being overbroad =/= GJ sub/SW being required process ...
concupiscible set
  12/17/17
Not saying its identical but 1 - key issue was expectation o...
slap-happy ocher lodge clown
  12/17/17
" That GSA simply turned over the emails without inform...
concupiscible set
  12/17/17
I am not claiming to be an MFE and I would not have been sur...
slap-happy ocher lodge clown
  12/17/17
Kitzhaber involved the government secretly archiving emails ...
Snowy Circlehead
  12/17/17
On government equipment.
slap-happy ocher lodge clown
  12/17/17
the decision takes a very boomer view of email, but it has n...
Snowy Circlehead
  12/17/17
Yup, when the transition team could easily have used the oth...
slap-happy ocher lodge clown
  12/17/17
Lol at actual Nazis crying about the 4th amendment
flesh supple dingle berry
  12/17/17
lol at this non-story generating a 100-post thread
curious jade sweet tailpipe
  12/17/17
wait, these are emails sent from a .gov email address? lol h...
curious jade sweet tailpipe
  12/18/17
Any updates on this scandal? Will Mueller be disbarred?
Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage
  12/19/17
...
mint kitty
  12/19/17
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-special-counsel-ne...
Arousing bistre potus casino
  12/19/17
Oh shit HH on the case.
mint kitty
  12/19/17
Lmao
Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage
  12/19/17
How much time we talking about ya big goof?
maroon confused kitchen
  02/11/18
Any day now I guess
maroon confused kitchen
  03/11/18
UPDATE :D????
Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage
  02/11/18
...
Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage
  03/09/18
...
Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage
  02/11/18
its crazy how they never get tired of being wrong all the ti...
curious jade sweet tailpipe
  03/11/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 5:07 PM
Author: Fragrant water buffalo menage

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/16/trump-lawyer-mueller-improperly-obtained-transition-documents-in-russia-probe.html

holy shit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34936780)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 5:12 PM
Author: irradiated stead degenerate

I predicted some time ago that Mueller would lose his law license over this investigation. I stand by that prediction.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34936806)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 5:15 PM
Author: Rusted national liquid oxygen

what are your credentials, other than being a retard?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34936825)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 5:27 PM
Author: Contagious Awkward Haunted Graveyard



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34936917)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 6:45 PM
Author: talking sick tanning salon

he's a harvard law grad

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34937518)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 6:45 PM
Author: lemon macaca

caltech UG if i remember correctly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34937523)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 11:56 PM
Author: Rusted national liquid oxygen

Odd that he’s saying retarded shit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34939685)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 6:46 PM
Author: Racy incel



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34937528)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 6:46 PM
Author: lemon macaca

you are talking to a Caltech UG

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34937529)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 6:54 PM
Author: flesh supple dingle berry



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34937595)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 11:18 PM
Author: soul-stirring glassy temple private investor



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34939461)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 10:22 AM
Author: Rusted national liquid oxygen

and therefore an expert on lolyer ethics?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940981)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:28 PM
Author: Beady-eyed resort associate

one of the finest law schools in the country

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941583)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 18th, 2017 1:43 PM
Author: galvanic mahogany public bath

Joe?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34949424)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 6:00 PM
Author: domesticated indecent location

cr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34937103)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 5:10 PM
Author: flesh supple dingle berry

Shut it down

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34936792)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 5:11 PM
Author: Purple stirring azn nursing home

need WLMAS to explain how this guy is upholding the rule of law by trashing the 4th amendment.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34936801)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 5:17 PM
Author: curious jade sweet tailpipe

he sent a subpoena. GSA responded to it. you want to tell me what ethical rule was violated? also, if Trump's team felt the subpoena sought privileged documents then they should have objected to it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34936844)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 9:51 PM
Author: Boyish theater

According to letter just released, there was no subpoena. Just a letter to GSA. And the Trump transition team was never made aware of the request prior to GSA forking over the emails to Mueller.

And Mueller and team had no ethical walls to cleanse the emails of privileged items before passing it onto investigators.

Lol just lol.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34938894)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 11:19 PM
Author: soul-stirring glassy temple private investor

weird how that pumo just vanished all the sudden

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34939464)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 11:24 PM
Author: domesticated indecent location



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34939497)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 7:53 AM
Author: alcoholic depressive field



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940507)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 9:33 AM
Author: curious jade sweet tailpipe

If there was no sunpoena and just a letter then thats even more innocuous. also, if the GSA was holing them then any privilege was destroyed. And your comment about Mueller's team reviewing them for privilege before passing them to investigators makes no sense since MUELLER's team ARE the investigators. What else you got?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940763)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 9:36 AM
Author: Multi-colored national security agency famous landscape painting

Succinct rejoinder of this retard

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940771)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 18th, 2017 9:23 AM
Author: aphrodisiac amber dilemma trump supporter



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34947532)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 9:35 AM
Author: Multi-colored national security agency famous landscape painting

This used to be a law bort.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940767)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 9:43 AM
Author: Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage

The 4th Amendment. Jesus.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940792)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 9:44 AM
Author: Multi-colored national security agency famous landscape painting



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940796)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 9:48 AM
Author: talking sick tanning salon



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940822)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 5:12 PM
Author: unhinged meetinghouse nibblets



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34936802)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 5:14 PM
Author: curious jade sweet tailpipe

lol good luck with that argument

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34936821)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 5:18 PM
Author: soul-stirring glassy temple private investor

Jesus

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34936850)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 5:18 PM
Author: curious jade sweet tailpipe

4 indictments and counting trumpfags

tick tok tick tok

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34936851)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 5:21 PM
Author: Arousing bistre potus casino

Lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34936869)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 5:48 PM
Author: provocative brilliant nowag

I’m with you, brother! I can’t wait for the uranium 1 indictments and particularly Huma going down for selling access as a special government employee!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34937014)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 5:22 PM
Author: Heady clear dopamine

Even if there's a legal argument to be made here, do Trump people really think it's good politics to insist that no one should be allowed to see the transition team's emails?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34936879)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 5:25 PM
Author: soul-stirring glassy temple private investor

lol are these the same people who argued that Hillary destroying emails in violation of a DOJ subpoena was NBD?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34936904)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 6:00 PM
Author: Chest-beating new version

No. The same people who claimed it was bad for Hillary to destroy emails are saying no one should be able to see these emails.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34937102)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 11:40 PM
Author: soul-stirring glassy temple private investor

so the same people who thought it was NBD for Hillary to acid bleach a bunch of civil servant's emails are now clamoring to see a political opponent's private emails?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34939578)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 7:48 AM
Author: provocative brilliant nowag

Bleach bit and sledge hammer to old Blackberries, which apparently shows they were smart enough to know their shit would leak if they didn’t destroy it. Guess maybe Trump’s team is to blame for not using bleach bit and hammers.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940505)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 8:03 AM
Author: sapphire telephone double fault

What's good for the goose...

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940535)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 9:53 PM
Author: Boyish theater

without a subpoena or warrant? Hell yes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34938908)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 11:39 PM
Author: Geriatric shrine



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34939567)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 6:43 PM
Author: spectacular brethren

Libs?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34937505)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 19th, 2017 1:02 PM
Author: hyperactive property love of her life

sounds like the problem lies with trump's ARE gsa

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34958165)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 6:54 PM
Author: talking sick tanning salon

tick tock trumpcucks

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34937594)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 6:55 PM
Author: flesh supple dingle berry



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34937597)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 1:08 PM
Author: unhinged meetinghouse nibblets



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941834)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 16th, 2017 11:24 PM
Author: domesticated indecent location

Jesus, the fourth amendment.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34939500)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 9:44 AM
Author: Multi-colored national security agency famous landscape painting



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940797)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 9:48 AM
Author: talking sick tanning salon



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940825)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:12 AM
Author: Ultramarine School Cafeteria Turdskin

Need JJC, Obeezy, or Rockapotamus to explain how this advances the rule of law and protects our civil liberties.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34939751)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:15 AM
Author: Ultramarine School Cafeteria Turdskin

Libs?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34939774)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:20 AM
Author: misunderstood motley stage

oddly silent

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34939795)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 7:52 AM
Author: provocative brilliant nowag

Remember, only libs have civil liberties. It’s their men’s right to change genders and use the bathroom with an 8 year old girl. It’s their women’s right to dress and act like a slut but accuse men of harassing them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940506)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 9:33 AM
Author: Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage

I'm not even sure what the Trumpcuck crowing is about. Is the administration going to go to a court to get back its computers? File a motion to suppress any documents in any future proceeding? Ask D.C. Bar counsel to reprimand Mueller for whatever they are claiming he did wrong? This letter and thread = complete gibberish

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940762)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 18th, 2017 9:28 AM
Author: aphrodisiac amber dilemma trump supporter

1) if anybody did anything wrong, it sounds like it was the GSA. Mueller just asked nicely for shit

2) if the GSA had the emails, the privilege was probably destroyed, hence trump's lawyer asking congress to fix this problem for future transition teams

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34947559)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 7:59 AM
Author: maroon confused kitchen

They sound worried

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940526)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 9:29 AM
Author: Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage

The Trumpcucks in this thread or the authors of this hilarious letter?7

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940750)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 10:52 AM
Author: maroon confused kitchen

Both brother

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941127)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 9:35 AM
Author: Multi-colored national security agency famous landscape painting

So he asked for some documents, someone gave them to him, and the folks he is investigating are pissed because they claim those were their documents?

Lol, keep fishing.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940766)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 9:40 AM
Author: provocative brilliant nowag

You've clearly never hired your own counsel with whom you've had privileged communications.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940780)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 9:42 AM
Author: Multi-colored national security agency famous landscape painting

I have, but let's assume the GSA had ACP with the TTT, how did Mueller fuck up?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940784)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 11:33 AM
Author: provocative brilliant nowag

Meuller fucked up twice: 1) no Chinese wall, and 2) failed to disclose receipt of potentially privileged communications.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941300)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 11:45 AM
Author: concupiscible set

If they are using a GSA server, not a fucking letter is privileged.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941359)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:02 PM
Author: provocative brilliant nowag

Love dat reading comprehension. They aren't government records. They are private materials. The GSA signed an MOU promising to destroy them not pass them to whomever. It's not GSA who can waive TTt privilege.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941434)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:07 PM
Author: concupiscible set

It's no different than speaking to your lawyer with a third party in the room.

Every govt computer has the "no expectation of privacy" thing on the sign in screen. The fact Trumptards are too dumb or arrogant to see this is on them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941457)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 2:33 PM
Author: provocative brilliant nowag

lol sure buddy, dat privacy notice trumps everything. Which would mean there’s no reason to have the Obama opinion on these materials being private, no reason for an MOU, and no reason to have the transition act itself. Go back to playing call of duty in your mom’s basement already.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34942423)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 19th, 2017 1:03 PM
Author: hyperactive property love of her life

"dat privacy notice trumps everything"

actually it does - wanna look up the jurisprudence on talking with your lawyer in a room with a sign saying there are microphones recording all conversations?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34958170)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 3:45 PM
Author: Outnumbered disrespectful juggernaut dragon

You cannot just eliminate waiver by claiming the materials are "private." Let's say your're doing business with another party, and you sign a contract which says that all communications between you and he other party are "private" and "confidential." And then you send supposedly A/C communications to that party. Do you really the "private" nature of those communications prevents waiver?

Maybe there are other arguments why the transition materials are privileged, but "private" argument is not strong

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34942841)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 9:45 AM
Author: Glittery Internal Respiration

Risten

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940801)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 9:51 AM
Author: Rusted national liquid oxygen

not a crim bro - can someone lay out what the issues are here? were the documents even still privileged if someone not on the transition team (ie, GSA) had them in their possession?

what is the fourth amendment issue? the investigators apparently asked for docs and they were willingly handed over. if the cops knock on my door, i'm not home and a houseguest lets them in and they find a pound of cocaine, can i raise the 4th amendment?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34940837)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 10:30 AM
Author: Big Puppy Trust Fund

No fourth amendment issue. Mueller asked for something and got them. No expectation of privacy when you willingly relinquish control over your papers to a third party.

Almost certainly no privilege issue. I can conceive of situations in which privileged documents held by neither the client nor counsel is privileged (for example, counsel hires an agent to review/store/organize documents), but this doesn't sound like it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941023)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 10:35 AM
Author: Rusted national liquid oxygen

who the fuck wrote this letter?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941050)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 10:42 AM
Author: Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage

Matthew Peterson

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941076)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 10:50 AM
Author: Multi-colored national security agency famous landscape painting



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941109)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 10:51 AM
Author: Multi-colored national security agency famous landscape painting

It sounds like (((FoxNews))) is juicing the contents of the letter, when it was actually legally sound because it was focused on the GSA.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941123)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 11:00 AM
Author: costumed locus

I agree no forth amendment issue, but the privilege issue is far from clear. Take a common situation in litigation or any large government investigation. Client receives subpoena, and then potentially relevant documents are hosted by a third party e-discovery vendor while the law firm reviews/produces. This happens tens of thousands of times every year in the United States, and no one makes a serious claim of waiver.

Mueller's team, instead of working through the normal channels (the transition team itself or their attorneys), side-stepped them and went directly to the third-party hosting the docs. There is nothing inherently unethical about that, although it is a shady/shitty tactic. However, it is potentially unethical in D.C. for Mueller's team to continue to review/use the documents once they know they are privileged. Also, the GSA attorneys face ethical issues if they handed everything over willy-nilly without regards to privilege.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941160)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 11:14 AM
Author: Big Puppy Trust Fund

In that case, third-party vendor is an agent of counsel, client, or both. Is GSA an agent of the TTT and just functioning as a "host" for documents? THat seems crazy, but I don't know much about why they had the documents in the first place, so I suppose that could be the case.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941225)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 11:21 AM
Author: Rusted national liquid oxygen

that was my reaction. it would seem that the documents were no longer privileged because they were handed over to a third party.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941250)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 11:22 AM
Author: Big Puppy Trust Fund

Yeah, I think there's law to the effect that even if you hand over your documents to a FOIA office, that destroys attorney-client privilege as it relates to you (the agency can still claim privilege).



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941252)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 11:31 AM
Author: costumed locus

They didn't "hand over" documents to the GSA. They used GSA offices and equipment during the transition, as both parties have done for 50+ years. The issue is after the election, in response to a simple letter, the GSA just dumped everything over to the Special Counsel's office.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941292)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 11:22 AM
Author: costumed locus

This is basically the point of the letter. The GSA is supposed to just provide facilities for the transition teams to use. If what the letter says is true, the head GSA dude handling this agreed, and then he literally died and they just handed everything over. I think it would be a fairly bi-partisan issue to say that the GSA does not "own" or otherwise have control over all of the transition documents. That would be insane, imo.

There is not any legal precedent on this because it has never happened before. I simply disagree with all the people squawking in this thread saying it is a black and white issue, and that GSA should be able to just hand over all the documents.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941251)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 11:26 AM
Author: soul-stirring glassy temple private investor

the pumos squawking itt are the same ones who still bleat about a Russian conspiracy. odd case

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941277)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 11:47 AM
Author: Big Puppy Trust Fund

Specifically, Loewentritt said, "in using our devices," transition team members were informed that materials "would not be held back in any law enforcement" actions.

Loewentritt read to BuzzFeed News a series of agreements that anyone had to agree to when using GSA materials during the transition, including that there could be monitoring and auditing of devices and that, "Therefore, no expectation of privacy can be assumed."

Loewentritt told BuzzFeed News that the GSA initially "suggested a warrant or subpoena" for the materials, but that the Special Counsel's Office determined the letter route was sufficient.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941367)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 11:55 AM
Author: costumed locus

Interesting twist then if that is in agreements with the GSA. I have to lol at Loewentritt reading this shit to Buzzfeed over the phone on a Saturday night. He is the guy that double-crossed the transition team after the GSA general counsel died, lol.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941401)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 11:55 AM
Author: Snowy Circlehead

lol what are you talking about. it is extremely common for documents and communications of interest in a criminal investigation to be in the custody of a third party. this happens constantly. every criminal investigation involving emails sent or received through gmail raises this fact pattern

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941400)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:02 PM
Author: costumed locus

I'm not sure what your point is. Documents are routinely hosted by third parties, yes. But they typically aren't just handed over carte blanche like GSA did. Look up the case law involving Gmail, Apple, or any other third party ISP or whatever. 99 out of 100 times it is them challenging an actual warrant or subpoena. GSA just shrugged their shoulders in response to a letter and handed over entire computers/cell phones, after they agreed not to.

Anyways, said I said above, I don't think this is illegal. I think it raises ethical issues if GSA attorneys dumped communications without respect to privilege, and if the Mueller team saw there were privileged materials and purposefully used them and didn't notify the Trump transition team.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941430)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:06 PM
Author: Snowy Circlehead

lol let's resume this when you graduate from law school

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941450)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:07 PM
Author: costumed locus

Sure, as soon as you finish your 12-step program. ;)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941453)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:33 PM
Author: Snowy Circlehead

what's that supposed to mean. bro, you gotta stop crediting every bullshit letter sent by counsel to try to get the cat back in the bag.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941611)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:41 PM
Author: costumed locus

I'm not crediting it entirely. I already said that: 1) I didn't see what happened as illegal; and 2) there isn't direct precedent on this issue. I see it as a potential ethics issue, and a very shady move by the Mueller team. The fact is what happened does not go down in any other analogous context.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941665)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:49 PM
Author: Snowy Circlehead

stop babbling about potential ethical issues and either cite a damn rule or shut up.

you're 100% wrong that third party custodians of electronic documents never produce them to law enforcement without a subpoena. that's laughably dumb that you think that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941708)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:53 PM
Author: costumed locus

I cited the ethics rules in another thread this morning. Look them up yourself. Are you already so drunk that you forgot?

And you're laughably stupid if you think what happened is at all normal with respect to third party custodians.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941735)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 1:12 PM
Author: Snowy Circlehead

what is with the alcohol references.

i'm not going to chase down every shitty thread you make. you're dumb, and you have no idea how anything works. third parties voluntarily give shit to law enforcement constantly, you stupid fuck. they're entitled to, and they do whatever is best for them. sometimes what's best is appearing to fight, sometimes not

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941867)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 1:42 PM
Author: costumed locus

LOL, I feel bad for anyone that seeks legal advice from you.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34942100)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:12 PM
Author: concupiscible set

Laughably dumb.

Google could give police/FBI/etc your gmail if they wanted but don't like the optics. So they demand SWs/GJ subs.

If they wanted to post your emails on google.com, that is their prerogative.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941474)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 18th, 2017 10:16 AM
Author: Violet Legal Warrant Spot

"Look up the case law involving Gmail, Apple, or any other third party ISP or whatever. 99 out of 100 times it is them challenging an actual warrant or subpoena."

Their user agreements don't have the express language that the GSA's agreement used that was quoted above. Thus, there is a reasonable expectation of privacy when using those platforms (on meta-data maybe).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34947900)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 18th, 2017 9:34 AM
Author: aphrodisiac amber dilemma trump supporter

titc analysis

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34947588)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:26 PM
Author: slap-happy ocher lodge clown

See the ninth circuit decision in in re grand jury subpoena (in re kitzhaber). Kitzhaber used government equipment to send/receive emails, and the government archived them. DOJ then issued grand jury subpoena without tailoring it at all to the issues under investigation. Kitzhaber intervened and argued he had an expectation of privacy. Ninth circuit agreed and tossed the subpoena.

Of course, kitzhaber can be easily distinguished because he was a democrat in the ninth circuit. For everyone else, especially Adolf trump schickelgruber, if you use government equipment, the suggestion that you have an expectation of privacy is laughable **liberal "experts" yuk it up in unison**.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941561)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:33 PM
Author: concupiscible set

GJ sub being overbroad =/= GJ sub/SW being required process to get access to the emails.

Edit: At issue were personal emails that were not government business, you fucking hack.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941615)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:40 PM
Author: slap-happy ocher lodge clown

Not saying its identical but 1 - key issue was expectation of privacy on emails sent on govt equipment. 2 - there's nothing magical about a subpoena. Are you arguing that DOJ could have asked Oregon for the emails, but because they issued a subpoena, it was subject to analysis re overbreadth? That GSA simply turned over the emails without informing the people who sent/received them is ridiculously amateur.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941653)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 3:52 PM
Author: concupiscible set

" That GSA simply turned over the emails without informing the people who sent/received them is ridiculously amateur."

You are way out of your league here.

Google 18 USC 2705(b).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34942887)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 6:24 PM
Author: slap-happy ocher lodge clown

I am not claiming to be an MFE and I would not have been surprised if your statute was relevant but it isn't. That statute specifically applies where there is a subpoena or other authorized process under which the demand is made. From what has been posted ITT, Mueller simply asked for it nicely and the GSA turned it over.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34943836)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:38 PM
Author: Snowy Circlehead

Kitzhaber involved the government secretly archiving emails sent to a private gmail account, idiot.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941645)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:41 PM
Author: slap-happy ocher lodge clown

On government equipment.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941655)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 12:51 PM
Author: Snowy Circlehead

the decision takes a very boomer view of email, but it has nothing to do with law enforcement asking for emails from someone a party intentionally gave them to

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941722)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 1:05 PM
Author: slap-happy ocher lodge clown

Yup, when the transition team could easily have used the other, confidential facilities provided for purposes of transition planning.

Look, I'm not saying it is an open and shut case of fourth am. violation or acp violation. But it is equally obvious that it is a colorable argument.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941817)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 1:06 PM
Author: flesh supple dingle berry

Lol at actual Nazis crying about the 4th amendment

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34941823)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 17th, 2017 3:53 PM
Author: curious jade sweet tailpipe

lol at this non-story generating a 100-post thread

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34942892)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 18th, 2017 9:14 AM
Author: curious jade sweet tailpipe

wait, these are emails sent from a .gov email address? lol how are they privileged?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34947478)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 19th, 2017 12:50 PM
Author: Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage

Any updates on this scandal? Will Mueller be disbarred?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34958055)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 19th, 2017 1:04 PM
Author: mint kitty



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34958179)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 19th, 2017 1:06 PM
Author: Arousing bistre potus casino

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-special-counsel-needs-to-investigate-the-fbi-and-justice-department-now/2017/12/04/5ca1234c-d916-11e7-b1a8-62589434a581_story.html?utm_term=.e7a5bd2a9e63

these things take time, silly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34958194)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 19th, 2017 1:08 PM
Author: mint kitty

Oh shit HH on the case.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34958211)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 19th, 2017 1:13 PM
Author: Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage

Lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#34958263)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2018 4:57 PM
Author: maroon confused kitchen

How much time we talking about ya big goof?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#35378328)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 11th, 2018 10:38 AM
Author: maroon confused kitchen

Any day now I guess

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#35580551)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2018 4:56 PM
Author: Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage

UPDATE :D????

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#35378322)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 9th, 2018 10:35 PM
Author: Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#35573558)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 11th, 2018 6:50 PM
Author: Vigorous rambunctious institution old irish cottage



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#35379270)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 11th, 2018 10:47 AM
Author: curious jade sweet tailpipe

its crazy how they never get tired of being wrong all the time. trumpmos have literally not been right about ONE THING to do with the Russian investigation.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3831389&forum_id=2#35580588)