would it have been a catch?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34949985)

Is that the governing factor? The referee determining whether a player is balanced or not?

Either way, its a dumb rule, because clearly he had the ball in his possession, enough to lung and stretch it out.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34950064)

Speaking as a non-fan with no dog in this hunt, that video above intuitively seems like he caught the ball. Like, if you ask a child "did that guy catch the ball" they'd all say yes.

But of course whether it's a catch or not isn't the point.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34950086)

https://mobile.twitter.com/leadingnfl/status/942549749609119744

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34950019)

if he's falling backward, the ball is on his chest, he hits the ground, the ball pops up, out of his possession, doesn't hit the ground, he re-catches

good catch right?

if he has the ball, in his possession the whole time, falls to the ground, ball touches the ground, clearly doesn't move, clearly maintains possession the whole time

still a good catch right?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34950107)

I agree that physics renders this unlikely

but that seems like a standard that isn't uniformly applied to exactly how indisputable what you're looking at has to be

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34950203)

I think it usually happens around fumble calls, where the question is whether the knee was down

due to piles of bodies, you don't get an exact view of the knee, but the hip will move such that the knee not hitting the ground would defy physics,

yet the call goes as call on the field stands because video evidence is inconclusive

-----

I think I've seen similar situation when reviewing whether or not a punt was touched, the ball will move in a way that defies physics, but the video evidence will be determined as inconclusive

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34950115)

The problem here was not with the rule, but with the way the NFL’s replay system operates. The on-field officials ruled that Benjamin got both feet down. Slow-motion replays raised the question of whether Benjamin’s second foot left the ground before he gained control, but there was no angle that definitively proved Benjamin didn’t have control when his foot left the ground.

The NFL is only supposed to overturn calls if there is “clear and obvious” video evidence that the on-field decision was wrong. If the video is inconclusive—or really, anything less than “clear and obvious”—the call on the field should stand. But between the Seferian-Jenkins overturn and this one, it’s now clear and obvious that the league’s replay office does not adhere to that standard.

The league’s replay system is meant to correct officiating errors by on-field officials. Instead, the league office is using challenges as an opportunity to freshly officiate the plays from New York. That takes a lot of agency away from the league’s referees. This is, of course, quite upsetting to officiating experts:

...

Leagues are right to use instant replay to ensure accuracy. But when slow-motion, high-definition replays from a variety of angles don’t definitively tell us what happened on a play, there is no right or wrong answer. And in those cases, there won’t be a better solution than trusting the refs.

https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2017/12/24/16817224/week-16-winners-and-losers-replay-officials-butt-interception-browns

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#35004410)

if you're a heterosexual male still watching the NFL you are a very confused individual

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34949953)

lol at grown men autistically raging on TV about this shit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34949964)

Jags would have played the Pats in the divisional round

This sport is ridiculous

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#35324709)