The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
So the NFL's game of the year boiled down to autistically debating a "catch"?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 18th, 2017 2:35 PM Author: boyish plaza skinny woman lol at anyone who watches this crap. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34949852) |
Date: December 18th, 2017 2:36 PM Author: cracking pea-brained house immigrant I’m over the replay bullshit. Mistakes will be made, people are human, move on and hope the next error is in your favor. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34949861) |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 2:38 PM Author: Adventurous Bonkers Area its not really a debate. the refs got the call on the field wrong. the only people who think otherwise are steeler fans and pats-haters (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34949871) |
 |
Date: December 18th, 2017 2:43 PM Author: boyish plaza skinny woman ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34949905) |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 2:47 PM Author: Hot irate kitty cat no they got it right. it's just a stupid rule (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34949934) |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 2:49 PM Author: Adventurous Bonkers Area its not a stupid rule. you have to make the catch. you can't lose it when you hit the ground if you don't yet have possession (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34949949) |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 2:51 PM Author: Hot irate kitty cat (Matt Damon) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34949967) |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 2:54 PM Author: Twisted box office hairy legs If Smith-Shuster the play before, had run 10 yards further, and then fallen into the endzone in the same manner, and the ball had moved in the same manner
would it have been a catch? |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 2:58 PM Author: Adventurous Bonkers Area i dont know which play youre referring to but if you run 10 yards will the ball you probably have possession, but it depends on whether youre bobbling it. but thats not what happened here. he caught it going to the ground (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34950009) |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 3:03 PM Author: Twisted box office hairy legs I legit don't know,
Is that the governing factor? The referee determining whether a player is balanced or not?
Either way, its a dumb rule, because clearly he had the ball in his possession, enough to lung and stretch it out. |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 3:05 PM Author: boyish plaza skinny woman >> Either way, its a dumb rule, because clearly he had the ball in his possession, enough to lunge and stretch it out. <<
Speaking as a non-fan with no dog in this hunt, that video above intuitively seems like he caught the ball. Like, if you ask a child "did that guy catch the ball" they'd all say yes.
But of course whether it's a catch or not isn't the point. |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 3:09 PM Author: Lime fragrant public bath puppy This is absolutely retarded. Do you know anything about football? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34950128) |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 3:15 PM Author: Twisted box office hairy legs guess not (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34950205) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2018 10:01 PM Author: Twisted box office hairy legs Want to change your mind? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#35324597) |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 2:54 PM Author: garnet filthpig psychic better not go back and rewatch the end of the Pats-Texans game then (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34949989) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2018 10:06 PM Author: Twisted box office hairy legs How was he not going to the ground on that? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#35324679) |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 2:51 PM Author: Twisted box office hairy legs what counts as 'indisputable video evidence'? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34949962) |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 2:59 PM Author: Adventurous Bonkers Area something like this where you can clearly see the ball fall out of his hands once he hits the ground
https://mobile.twitter.com/leadingnfl/status/942549749609119744
|
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 3:07 PM Author: Twisted box office hairy legs just to be autistic...
if he's falling backward, the ball is on his chest, he hits the ground, the ball pops up, out of his possession, doesn't hit the ground, he re-catches
good catch right?
if he has the ball, in his possession the whole time, falls to the ground, ball touches the ground, clearly doesn't move, clearly maintains possession the whole time
still a good catch right? |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 3:10 PM Author: Lime fragrant public bath puppy Wut? What points are you trying to make here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34950141) |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 3:15 PM Author: Twisted box office hairy legs do you have to see the ball actually touching the grass when it moves? It obviously moves due to him falling, by the time you see it touching the grass, it appears to be back in 'dispute' as to whether he has control over it
I agree that physics renders this unlikely
but that seems like a standard that isn't uniformly applied to exactly how indisputable what you're looking at has to be |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 3:08 PM Author: Twisted box office hairy legs the reason I'm getting autistic with this, is that I've seen calls that seem to meet a different standard of what exactly you need to see
I think it usually happens around fumble calls, where the question is whether the knee was down
due to piles of bodies, you don't get an exact view of the knee, but the hip will move such that the knee not hitting the ground would defy physics,
yet the call goes as call on the field stands because video evidence is inconclusive
-----
I think I've seen similar situation when reviewing whether or not a punt was touched, the ball will move in a way that defies physics, but the video evidence will be determined as inconclusive |
|
Date: December 25th, 2017 2:31 PM Author: Twisted box office hairy legs After the Benjamin score was overturned, many immediately blamed the NFL’s famously broken catch rule. But in a strange twist, the catch rule was not the problem here. The question here was whether both of Benjamin’s feet touched down in the end zone when he gained control of the ball. Having both feet down with possession is the purest definition of a catch, the one we all understood before things got extremely complicated.
The problem here was not with the rule, but with the way the NFL’s replay system operates. The on-field officials ruled that Benjamin got both feet down. Slow-motion replays raised the question of whether Benjamin’s second foot left the ground before he gained control, but there was no angle that definitively proved Benjamin didn’t have control when his foot left the ground.
The NFL is only supposed to overturn calls if there is “clear and obvious” video evidence that the on-field decision was wrong. If the video is inconclusive—or really, anything less than “clear and obvious”—the call on the field should stand. But between the Seferian-Jenkins overturn and this one, it’s now clear and obvious that the league’s replay office does not adhere to that standard.
The league’s replay system is meant to correct officiating errors by on-field officials. Instead, the league office is using challenges as an opportunity to freshly officiate the plays from New York. That takes a lot of agency away from the league’s referees. This is, of course, quite upsetting to officiating experts:
...
Leagues are right to use instant replay to ensure accuracy. But when slow-motion, high-definition replays from a variety of angles don’t definitively tell us what happened on a play, there is no right or wrong answer. And in those cases, there won’t be a better solution than trusting the refs.
https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2017/12/24/16817224/week-16-winners-and-losers-replay-officials-butt-interception-browns |
|
Date: February 4th, 2018 10:09 PM Author: Impertinent chartreuse gas station lol at Pats fan alternate reality (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#35324730) |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 2:50 PM Author: Flirting university the NFL is done, dude
if you're a heterosexual male still watching the NFL you are a very confused individual |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 2:51 PM Author: boyish plaza skinny woman i haven't watched for 4+ years.
lol at grown men autistically raging on TV about this shit. |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 3:02 PM Author: Deranged Abusive Clown Station (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34950049) |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 2:59 PM Author: violent shaky volcanic crater idiot the "rules" of your "sport" are pretty fucking stupid when the only way to enforce them is through a super zoomed-in, slow motion and reversed, multi-angle replay in hd (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34950022) |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 3:01 PM Author: boyish plaza skinny woman lmao (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34950042) |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 4:43 PM Author: embarrassed to the bone stage marketing idea (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34951036) |
|
Date: December 18th, 2017 4:41 PM Author: Arrogant sticky goyim this is basically the dez catch all over again, no? it was a shit rule then and it's shit now (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#34951017) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2018 10:02 PM Author: Charismatic claret pervert halford (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#35324602) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2018 10:02 PM Author: shivering aquamarine masturbator mood (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#35324606) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2018 10:02 PM Author: Pontificating cobalt point The whole season boiled down to that (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#35324609) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2018 10:08 PM Author: Twisted box office hairy legs The Steelers would have been the #1 seed
Jags would have played the Pats in the divisional round
This sport is ridiculous |
|
Date: March 1st, 2018 5:24 PM Author: boyish plaza skinny woman cr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#35516351) |
|
Date: February 4th, 2018 10:08 PM Author: Flatulent aromatic sweet tailpipe meetinghouse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#35324716) |
|
Date: March 1st, 2018 5:24 PM Author: boyish plaza skinny woman Lol, and then of course the Super Bowl had the same issue (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#35516349) |
|
Date: March 1st, 2018 6:11 PM Author: excitant shrine sex offender One of the announcers exaggerated the ambiguity of the call (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3833092&forum_id=2#35516606) |