https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMcjxSThD54

wow

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35171783)

This chick is infuriating.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35172041)

Literally true.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35232470)

JP: "Intelligence and conscientiousness are traits that predict success"

Her: "So you're saying women are less intelligent?!?"

She's literally just fishing for "gotcha" soundbites for 20 minutes straight, she's so far out of her intellectual depth. This is actually insightful to how a typical journalist interprets logical / scientific arguments that counter their beliefs like the wage gap.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35194965)

it's like she's not listening to anything he says and instead she goes to a pre-drawn list of dumb comment-questions.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35178120)

wtf?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35178129)

sadly, she's a champion of modern UK elite culture.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35178228)

the defining quality of our time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35178267)

What I cannot understand is how she "needed a minute to process" his answer when any sentient being would have instantly recognized it as /thread.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35186828)

http://archive.is/eFerq

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35186910)

SHUT IT DOWN.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35194736)

Knew nothing of Jordan Peterson, but he’s a logical machine.

The woman isn’t dumb, but he defused her moves every step of the way. She also mischaracterized his points constantly, which he handled perfectly.

180 debate that he wins with aplomb.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35194488)

id recommend the biblical lecture series as well

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-wWBGo6a2w

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35194549)

Which is great, because that’s my favorite movie ever.

And I also like Nietzsche.

But he’s a little full of his own brilliance.

To be fair, he is very smart. Just laying it on a little thick here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35194712)

Just reminds me of: https://youtu.be/_EVsJt4A3nQ

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35194788)

He also does an incredible job arguing for the utility of religion without literal interpretation - he even has a group of young white male followers that call themselves "christian atheists". He's somehow simultaneously a philosopher, clinical psychologist, political/social critic, theologian, and self-help writer.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35195015)

Edit: tldr; he's not in the spotlight because of what he said, but because HE said it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35202236)

The main point isn't his academic resume` - it's that having someone like him to go around putting out that much content and doing that many debates, podcasts, etc. with the positions he holds is a true rarity in today's cultural climate and he's a complete gem if you're anti-progressive/sjw. He's a well respected, serious academic scholar that we have, whether he's winning the nobel prize isn't really our point we just may have sounded hyperbolic

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35205772)

He wrote Maps of Meaning. Let's not diminish the fact that he wrote a classic because he's in the rabble of the time

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35202195)

But mostly the point is that for today's cultural climate he is a complete gem if you're anti-progressive / anti-sjw. And if you listen to him on podcasts (e.g. his joe rogan appearances) the level of discussion is truly refreshing - it's important that we have people like him as a defense against SJW insanity. Because his academic credentials gives him weight that the left can't just brush him off as some e.g. sean hannity loon. (due to the left's obsession with academic credentials, "party of science" etc.)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35205748)

I loved the interview.

The other one I got linked to, he got too academic & full of himself, while still making some good points.

It became a bit much, though.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35195035)

I'm a big fan of his anti-SJW and anti-communist material, but his definition of truth is fucking laughable.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35201889)

https://twitter.com/jseths/status/953435129648689152

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35202088)

https://www.reddit.com/r/Jordan_Peterson_Memes/comments/7rtn1j/heres_jordy_not_threatening_or_trying_to_offend/

https://www.reddit.com/r/Jordan_Peterson_Memes/comments/7r5yin/channel_4_sort_yourselves_out/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35205810)

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/01/21/delingpole-left-reframes-jordan-petersons-sjw-takedown-as-misogynist-alt-right-bullying/

this is gonna red pill the entire world YNY!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35209195)

And some people are calling her a victim?

All she did was try to bully him & put words in his mouth.

Womansplaining, I guess.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35233016)

Before this video I had a kind of mixed opinion about Peterson, but he definitely earned my respect here. I hate to use this expression, but this is some serious redpill shit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3862016&forum_id=2#35233387)