\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Iornically if the framers had adopted Vermont's verbiage on gun rights

The gun control debate would be nonexistent. The liberal sta...
Bright abode
  02/18/18
Live free or die.
Soul-stirring Apoplectic Main People Spot
  02/18/18
It makes you wonder why the founding fathers used such convo...
Bright abode
  02/18/18
Yeah but we'd have been conquered in the early 19th century ...
high-end school
  02/18/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 18th, 2018 11:45 AM
Author: Bright abode

The gun control debate would be nonexistent. The liberal state in the country has the most unambiguous gun rights language in its constitution:

Article 16. [Right to bear arms; standing armies; military power subordinate to civil]

That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the State--and as standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military should be kept under strict subordination to and governed by the civil power.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3896664&forum_id=2#35430470)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 18th, 2018 11:49 AM
Author: Soul-stirring Apoplectic Main People Spot

Live free or die.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3896664&forum_id=2#35430491)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 18th, 2018 11:50 AM
Author: Bright abode

It makes you wonder why the founding fathers used such convoluted language in the 2A.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3896664&forum_id=2#35430496)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 18th, 2018 11:52 AM
Author: high-end school

Yeah but we'd have been conquered in the early 19th century without a standing army.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3896664&forum_id=2#35430502)