\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

True PATRIOT and SCHOLAR xo jared taylor suing tttwitttttter

https://youtu.be/CUg5TrWzjzY
Honey-headed confused address
  02/21/18
Full complaint: https://www.scribd.com/document/372035678/Ta...
Honey-headed confused address
  02/21/18
...
Honey-headed confused address
  02/21/18
Randazza is bringing some pretty novel claims here. The only...
Bearded factory reset button
  02/21/18
All the claims look viable to me. Whether a shitlib Californ...
Honey-headed confused address
  02/21/18
Did you even read it? The California constitutional claims u...
Bearded factory reset button
  02/21/18
Yes, and the complaint sets out the grounds for the relief r...
Honey-headed confused address
  02/21/18
This legal tactic has been bandied about in conservative leg...
soul-stirring twisted preventive strike
  02/21/18
...
Honey-headed confused address
  02/21/18
Just because idiots bandy something about doesn't mean it is...
Bearded factory reset button
  02/22/18
Cal SC had its chance to overturn Pruneyard and - stupidly -...
Adventurous Indian Lodge
  02/22/18
They affirmed it but also narrowed its scope significantly. ...
Bearded factory reset button
  02/22/18
Actual lawyer here, yes the Cal SC could always create some ...
Adventurous Indian Lodge
  02/22/18
Maybe, except the Cal. Sup. Ct. came back in Ralphs Grocery ...
Bearded factory reset button
  02/22/18
going to be upfront here buddy - I'm actually *on* the Calif...
Adventurous Indian Lodge
  02/22/18
LOL. Alright then.
Bearded factory reset button
  02/22/18
...
Honey-headed confused address
  02/22/18
tuhhhwhhitter
Bipolar wonderful parlor twinkling uncleanness
  02/21/18
...
demanding glassy den circlehead
  02/21/18
...
fuchsia multi-colored brunch
  02/21/18
Are there no scholars on xo to analyze what could be a landm...
Honey-headed confused address
  02/21/18
do you think we're lawyers or something?
fuchsia multi-colored brunch
  02/21/18
???
sienna haunting field
  02/22/18
no
Abnormal quadroon house
  02/22/18
...
Abnormal quadroon house
  02/22/18
is there a legal basis for the argument that a private compa...
Coral theater
  02/22/18
Yes
Honey-headed confused address
  02/22/18
Not really. The argument they're making is based on the ...
Bearded factory reset button
  02/22/18
so you're saying they're making an argument and there is a l...
demanding glassy den circlehead
  02/22/18
I'm saying the argument they're making isn't based on associ...
Bearded factory reset button
  02/22/18
There are also contractual and other statutory arguments bes...
Honey-headed confused address
  02/22/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 10:53 AM
Author: Honey-headed confused address

https://youtu.be/CUg5TrWzjzY

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35451667)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 11:03 AM
Author: Honey-headed confused address

Full complaint: https://www.scribd.com/document/372035678/Taylor-v-Twitter-Complaint

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35451721)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 11:25 AM
Author: Honey-headed confused address



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35451867)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 11:38 AM
Author: Bearded factory reset button

Randazza is bringing some pretty novel claims here. The only one that looks remotely viable to me is the breach of contract claim against Twitter over the terms of service.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35451970)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 12:50 PM
Author: Honey-headed confused address

All the claims look viable to me. Whether a shitlib California judge will agree is another story

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35452513)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 3:35 PM
Author: Bearded factory reset button

Did you even read it? The California constitutional claims under Robins v. Pruneyard are interesting, but a YUGE stretch. Same with the Unruh claims.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35453990)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 3:43 PM
Author: Honey-headed confused address

Yes, and the complaint sets out the grounds for the relief requested quite clearly. I'm sure there's competing case law on the other side and perhaps it's overwhelming against Taylor but I wouldn't describe the claims as a stretch on paper.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35454064)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 11:03 PM
Author: soul-stirring twisted preventive strike

This legal tactic has been bandied about in conservative legal circles for some time

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/twitters-censorship-may-be-unconstitutional/article/2617261

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35457710)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 11:18 PM
Author: Honey-headed confused address



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35457845)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:42 AM
Author: Bearded factory reset button

Just because idiots bandy something about doesn't mean it is valid.

The California Supreme Court has spent 30 years limiting its Pruneyard decision to the point where it literally only applies to facts that are on all fours. Turning Twitter into that kind of public square - even with the U.S. Supreme Court's dicta in Packingham - is going to be a tremendous uphill battle. Not saying it's impossible, just novel and unlikely.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459421)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:29 AM
Author: Adventurous Indian Lodge

Cal SC had its chance to overturn Pruneyard and - stupidly - affirmed it 4-3.

I don't see how there's any way Twitter avoids a pruneyard claim unless they finally overturn it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459348)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:43 AM
Author: Bearded factory reset button

They affirmed it but also narrowed its scope significantly. See above.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459424)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 9:21 AM
Author: Adventurous Indian Lodge

Actual lawyer here, yes the Cal SC could always create some results-oriented jurisprudence and decide that Pruneyard doesn't apply to twitter because, mumble mumble mumble, but any honest application of the precedent would hold that Pruneyard either applies to Twitter or should be overturned.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459575)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 9:54 AM
Author: Bearded factory reset button

Maybe, except the Cal. Sup. Ct. came back in Ralphs Grocery Co. v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union (2012) and signficantly limited Pruneyard's application to public gathering areas at shopping centers. The principles may be similar, but there are major differences, beginning with the user agreement that one has to enter into in order to use Twitter's services.

Again, they might get there, but it's going to be a big stretch.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459750)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 10:21 AM
Author: Adventurous Indian Lodge

going to be upfront here buddy - I'm actually *on* the California Supreme Court and I'm planning on holding that Pruneyard applies. HTMFH

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459881)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 10:21 AM
Author: Bearded factory reset button

LOL. Alright then.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459884)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 10:15 AM
Author: Honey-headed confused address



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459851)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 11:06 AM
Author: Bipolar wonderful parlor twinkling uncleanness

tuhhhwhhitter

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35451737)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 3:39 PM
Author: demanding glassy den circlehead



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35454017)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 11:13 PM
Author: fuchsia multi-colored brunch



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35457801)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 10:56 PM
Author: Honey-headed confused address

Are there no scholars on xo to analyze what could be a landmark case?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35457638)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 11:13 PM
Author: fuchsia multi-colored brunch

do you think we're lawyers or something?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35457804)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:27 AM
Author: sienna haunting field

???

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459337)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:46 AM
Author: Abnormal quadroon house

no

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459433)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:49 AM
Author: Abnormal quadroon house



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459444)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 10:55 AM
Author: Coral theater

is there a legal basis for the argument that a private company should be required to associate with white nationalists even if it doesnt want to?



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35460148)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 11:05 AM
Author: Honey-headed confused address

Yes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35460220)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 11:07 AM
Author: Bearded factory reset button

Not really.

The argument they're making is based on the Pruneyard decision of the Cal. Sup. Ct. that allows private property to be treated as a public forum in limited circumstances, thereby limiting the property owner's ability to limit speech in that place.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35460245)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 11:08 AM
Author: demanding glassy den circlehead

so you're saying they're making an argument and there is a legal basis for that argument

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35460249)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 11:10 AM
Author: Bearded factory reset button

I'm saying the argument they're making isn't based on association, which is what the OP of this subthread asked about.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35460270)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 12:22 PM
Author: Honey-headed confused address

There are also contractual and other statutory arguments besides the California constitution made which all have prima facie bases. Obviously there isn't a direct precedent and that's why it could be a landmark case but the foundation to build it is there

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35460853)