\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Trump to push for stronger bkgd checks w mental health focus, raise purchase age

to 21, and outlaw bump stocks https://mobile.twitter.com...
High-end stimulating partner tank
  02/22/18
he will not get my vote in 2020 if the age to purchase long ...
odious black woman
  02/22/18
why long guns vs. handguns?
well-lubricated sweet tailpipe range
  02/22/18
handguns already is 21. Can't blame trump for that
odious black woman
  02/22/18
seems like an odd distinction to make. plus i would think t...
well-lubricated sweet tailpipe range
  02/22/18
I agree completely but handguns have been 21+ since as long ...
odious black woman
  02/22/18
Lib here, but I think pointing out that nearly all recent ma...
Curious philosopher-king
  02/22/18
So why are libs so focused on it
harsh translucent laser beams
  02/22/18
What a fucking cuck
exciting insane jew stead
  02/22/18
lol this is gonna piss people off
Soul-stirring tanning salon
  02/22/18
My guess is it’s ultimately another bluff. “See? The Dems do...
High-end stimulating partner tank
  02/22/18
I personally highly doubt Democrats will filibuster any bill...
Soul-stirring tanning salon
  02/22/18
I don’t know. He gave them a pretty good deal on DACA and th...
High-end stimulating partner tank
  02/22/18
The DACA deal involved major concessions to the right on imm...
Soul-stirring tanning salon
  02/22/18
I wouldn't assume that this is how any legislation will actu...
haunting cerebral background story
  02/22/18
He’ll walk this back at CPAC tomorrow, as he always does.
Curious philosopher-king
  02/22/18
Trump becomes a retard when people throw out the "but t...
haunting cerebral background story
  02/22/18
Mental Health checks/a better mental health system isn't a b...
Amethyst beady-eyed fortuitous meteor
  02/22/18
There are also already laws in place that should have caught...
High-end stimulating partner tank
  02/22/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:32 AM
Author: High-end stimulating partner tank

to 21, and outlaw bump stocks

https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/966662241977360384

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459368)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:35 AM
Author: odious black woman

he will not get my vote in 2020 if the age to purchase long guns is raised to 21

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459384)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:40 AM
Author: well-lubricated sweet tailpipe range

why long guns vs. handguns?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459410)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:41 AM
Author: odious black woman

handguns already is 21. Can't blame trump for that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459418)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:43 AM
Author: well-lubricated sweet tailpipe range

seems like an odd distinction to make. plus i would think that handguns would be more "important" for 18 y/o to access because people move out on their own and might want one for home defense.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459426)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:44 AM
Author: odious black woman

I agree completely but handguns have been 21+ since as long as I can remember

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459429)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 9:10 AM
Author: Curious philosopher-king

Lib here, but I think pointing out that nearly all recent mass murders were over 21 or under 18!should at least demonstrate this age thing is a straw man.

Either ban the gun or the restrict access to the gun. But looking at age is a pointless half measure



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459517)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 9:39 AM
Author: harsh translucent laser beams

So why are libs so focused on it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459676)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:37 AM
Author: exciting insane jew stead

What a fucking cuck

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459390)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:42 AM
Author: Soul-stirring tanning salon

lol this is gonna piss people off

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459422)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:54 AM
Author: High-end stimulating partner tank

My guess is it’s ultimately another bluff. “See? The Dems don’t want reasonable gun control. They just want to wipe out the second amendment.”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459464)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:56 AM
Author: Soul-stirring tanning salon

I personally highly doubt Democrats will filibuster any bill that genuinely ups gun control. If they do they're insane. Frankly it's more plausible to me that the GOP filibusters.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459472)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 9:38 AM
Author: High-end stimulating partner tank

I don’t know. He gave them a pretty good deal on DACA and they passed. They’re the party of “it doesn’t do enough so we’re going to take our ball and go home.”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459671)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 9:41 AM
Author: Soul-stirring tanning salon

The DACA deal involved major concessions to the right on immigration. This doesn't involve any concessions, and with guns there is no real downside to accepting incremental victories. Nobody gets deported under a moderate gun control bill.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459682)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 9:42 AM
Author: haunting cerebral background story

I wouldn't assume that this is how any legislation will actually work.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459690)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 9:04 AM
Author: Curious philosopher-king

He’ll walk this back at CPAC tomorrow, as he always does.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459500)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 9:41 AM
Author: haunting cerebral background story

Trump becomes a retard when people throw out the "but think of the CHILDREN!" argument.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459681)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 9:55 AM
Author: Amethyst beady-eyed fortuitous meteor

Mental Health checks/a better mental health system isn't a bad idea - that is one area where I think the government could get back to where it was in the Pre-Regan with these institutionalization situations with the crazies.

I think in the case of Sandy Hook and this one both of the kids were on antipsychotics or pills of some sort, same with that piece of shit in Charleston who killed all those church ladies.

For example the fact the media does not admit is that the Sandy Hook guy's mom was to blame - she was the gun nut in the family and obviously her son had significant issues that should have made her worry - at least enough to have her weaponry not be accessible to her son.

As to the utility of banning guns in response to the crimes of these insane people? I don't think that it is really useful.

As for this current shooter IDK what the situation was, because I am pretty disengaged from news media but I read that his mom died pretty recently. I think a combo of a mental illness, medication history and a traumatic life event should require an individual under 18 or 21 to wait longer than the normal period to purchase a firearm.

The call for gun bans in response to these people (mentally ill, uninvolved parents) is not really getting to the issue at heart: Mental Illness not dealt with by parents due to absence or negligence.

FWIW in Ancient China and Japan if you had your kids do some really bad crimes, they would come for you - your parents and sometimes even your aunts/uncles and cousins - this family liability has a strong deterrent effect - even though it would be unconstitutional here the concept is still powerful: people need to have a community awareness and involvement

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459758)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 9:57 AM
Author: High-end stimulating partner tank

There are also already laws in place that should have caught this guy, if not for disparate impact policies by the county:

http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899402&mc=86&forum_id=2#35453945

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900293&forum_id=2#35459764)