How Badly Is Gorsuch Annoying the Other Justices?
| Flesh bateful piazza community account | 02/22/18 | | Comical Low-t Coffee Pot | 02/22/18 | | Cracking stage | 02/22/18 | | Comical Low-t Coffee Pot | 02/22/18 | | hateful wagecucks ticket booth | 02/22/18 | | Comical Low-t Coffee Pot | 02/22/18 | | hateful wagecucks ticket booth | 02/22/18 | | Comical Low-t Coffee Pot | 02/22/18 | | anal rambunctious psychic | 02/22/18 | | Comical Low-t Coffee Pot | 02/22/18 | | Nighttime parlor | 02/22/18 | | Comical Low-t Coffee Pot | 02/22/18 | | infuriating cuckoldry | 02/22/18 | | violent tan trailer park | 02/22/18 | | Cordovan striped hyena | 02/22/18 | | Glassy Main People Hell | 02/22/18 | | curious boistinker useless brakes | 02/22/18 | | Lime Space | 02/22/18 | | exhilarant sadistic depressive senate | 02/22/18 | | galvanic talking crotch | 02/22/18 | | Comical Low-t Coffee Pot | 02/22/18 | | useless ruddy forum athletic conference | 02/22/18 | | Abusive Turdskin | 02/22/18 | | Pearly state | 02/22/18 | | Concupiscible gaped church | 02/22/18 | | Pearly state | 02/22/18 | | Tripping disrespectful cumskin pit | 02/22/18 | | Brindle puppy | 02/22/18 | | Pearly state | 02/22/18 | | Tripping disrespectful cumskin pit | 02/22/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 22nd, 2018 2:50 PM Author: Comical Low-t Coffee Pot
There is nothing unlawful about Gorsuch’s speeches,
There is nothing unlawful about Gorsuch’s speeches,
There is nothing unlawful about Gorsuch’s speeches,
There is nothing unlawful about Gorsuch’s speeches,
There is nothing unlawful about Gorsuch’s speeches,
There is nothing unlawful about Gorsuch’s speeches,
There is nothing unlawful about Gorsuch’s speeches,
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900663&forum_id=2#35462172) |
Date: February 22nd, 2018 2:51 PM Author: Comical Low-t Coffee Pot
gorsuch = asshole for dominating OA. CT = moron for sleeping thru OA. which is it libs?
"Gorsuch’s speeches might appear less distasteful to his colleagues if he had made an otherwise more graceful début on the Court. As Linda Greenhouse observed in the Times at the end of Gorsuch’s first term, he managed to violate the Court’s traditions as soon as he arrived. He dominated oral arguments, when new Justices are expected to hang back."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900663&forum_id=2#35462183) |
Date: February 22nd, 2018 2:54 PM Author: Comical Low-t Coffee Pot
THANK FUCKING GOD
"And the new Justice is casting [votes] just as his sponsors had hoped and his opponents had feared."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900663&forum_id=2#35462202) |
Date: February 22nd, 2018 3:10 PM Author: useless ruddy forum athletic conference
ljl at this catty fag.
if Scalia can hope that Kagan gets nominated to SCOTUS, i think we can sleep well knowing that a difference of opinions on the law or how decisions are written won't have the justices making despondent entries into their diaries about the meanies on the Court.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900663&forum_id=2#35462324) |
Date: February 22nd, 2018 7:51 PM Author: Pearly state
it's the job of Toobin, Greenhouse, Lithwick and their pals to create an impression that each conservative justice is, like, totally hated by all the cool kids and had better change their ways immediately or no one will like them!
it always used to work and was called the "Greenhouse Effect." but Scalia and Thomas proved immune. Gorsuch will be too. Roberts can be swayed. Kennedy cares too deeply about what others think of him.
it's a tactic and sometimes it works.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900663&forum_id=2#35464781) |
|
|