The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
England abolishes right of confrontation
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:14 PM Author: Demanding Embarrassed To The Bone Locus https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/mar/19/victims-rape-spared-ordeal-cross-examination-court (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923260&forum_id=2#35641421) |
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:16 PM Author: disrespectful crackhouse therapy Hahahahahaha. Just do lynch the dude. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923260&forum_id=2#35641439) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:17 PM Author: Motley bearded casino Libs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923260&forum_id=2#35641445) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:19 PM Author: Trip Principal's Office Regret every white male is going to jail for rape now (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923260&forum_id=2#35641461) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:21 PM Author: excitant zippy brethren Good-bye common law, you had a good run. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923260&forum_id=2#35641476) |
 |
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:22 PM Author: Demanding Embarrassed To The Bone Locus lol try law that has been around for at least 2,000 years
"I answered them that it was not the custom of the Romans to give up anyone before the accused met the accusers face to face and had opportunity to make his defense concerning the charge laid against him." - Acts 25:16 |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:32 PM Author: excitant zippy brethren I do not know if there is an uninterrupted practice of this Roman custom surviving through the dark ages, but English common law, in my estimation, is a pinnacle achievement of Western civilization, an accumulator of wisdom. At any rate, goodbye Western civilization, you had a good run. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923260&forum_id=2#35641576) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:33 PM Author: Lime dragon (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923260&forum_id=2#35641585) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:39 PM Author: Motley bearded casino (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923260&forum_id=2#35641610) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:29 PM Author: Lime dragon (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923260&forum_id=2#35641552) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:25 PM Author: Very tactful theater incel Its bad but not as bad as your OP makes it sound. Defense can still cross examine just that its done before trial and then the video tape is played for the jury. this was previously done for offenses against children to spare them trauma and to control the cross examination better
still a shitty move and fuck shitlibs |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:27 PM Author: Demanding Embarrassed To The Bone Locus totally is and would not fly in usa (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923260&forum_id=2#35641531) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:28 PM Author: Glassy contagious rehab Didn't you take Evidence with Capra? Of course this flies here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923260&forum_id=2#35641540) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:29 PM Author: Demanding Embarrassed To The Bone Locus lol i didn't take evidence in ls
i took barbri and clerked on a court of appeals so never learned the rules and now do mostly tranny work in flyover so know fuck all about the federal rules of evidence |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:32 PM Author: Violent Azn Plaza https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawford_v._Washington
This history, Scalia concluded, clearly shows that the Confrontation Clause was directed at keeping "ex parte" examinations out of the evidentiary record. Specifically, the Confrontation Clause applies to "witnesses" against the accused, meaning "those who 'bear testimony'". Relying on this and the historical record, Scalia stated, "the Framers would not have allowed admission of testimonial statements of a witness who did not appear at trial unless he was unavailable to testify, and the defendant had had a prior opportunity for cross-examination." Scalia determined that a prior opportunity for cross-examination was mandatory, and dispositive of whether or not testimonial statements of an unavailable witness are admissible. |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:31 PM Author: razzmatazz alpha "But Lisa Avalos, a professor of law at the University of Arkansas who has carried out comparative work on rape prosecutions between Britain and the US, said false allegations of rape make up just 2-3% of all rape allegations according to a study commissioned by the Home Office."
Lol at this dishonest piece of shit. The 2-3% false allegation rate are allegations that police classify as totally false (that is, lying to police). By that standard only a minority of rape allegations are true, considering most never result in prosecution. |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:34 PM Author: excitant zippy brethren (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923260&forum_id=2#35641587) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:35 PM Author: Lime dragon (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923260&forum_id=2#35641594) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:39 PM Author: judgmental address main people LMAO
Maybe she misspoke. I bet 97% are false or grossly exaggerated. |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 9:43 PM Author: Disturbing lodge It's impossible to rape without evidence of violence or drugging (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923260&forum_id=2#35641635) |