In Peterson's defense he is completely derivative
| Concupiscible Canary Double Fault | 03/19/18 | | Concupiscible Canary Double Fault | 03/19/18 | | citrine stag film | 03/19/18 | | Concupiscible Canary Double Fault | 03/19/18 | | Bespoke Menage Circlehead | 03/19/18 | | Concupiscible Canary Double Fault | 03/19/18 | | Bespoke Menage Circlehead | 03/19/18 | | Concupiscible Canary Double Fault | 03/19/18 | | Bespoke Menage Circlehead | 03/19/18 | | Concupiscible Canary Double Fault | 03/20/18 | | Bespoke Menage Circlehead | 03/20/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 10:00 PM Author: Concupiscible Canary Double Fault
lol this is like the 3rd sentence of "the concept of the collective unconscious":
the contents of the collective unconscious have
never been in consciousness, and therefore have never been
individually acquired, but owe their existence exclusively to
heredity.
lol JP come on man
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923288&forum_id=2#35641745) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 10:07 PM Author: Bespoke Menage Circlehead
No, I am saying that proof of God is just as feasible as proof that your life is not a dream of some silicon-based creature in a matrix-plugged cocoon.
You make an assumption that your life is real and conduct yourself accordingly, to your benefit, and to the benefit of other people.
You make an assumption that God is real and conduct yourself accordingly, to your benefit, and to the benefit of other people.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923288&forum_id=2#35641796) |
|
|