In Peterson's defense he is completely derivative
| Crimson Aggressive Potus | 03/19/18 | | Crimson Aggressive Potus | 03/19/18 | | talented incel mood | 03/19/18 | | Crimson Aggressive Potus | 03/19/18 | | green razzle-dazzle senate boiling water | 03/19/18 | | Crimson Aggressive Potus | 03/19/18 | | green razzle-dazzle senate boiling water | 03/19/18 | | Crimson Aggressive Potus | 03/19/18 | | green razzle-dazzle senate boiling water | 03/19/18 | | Crimson Aggressive Potus | 03/20/18 | | green razzle-dazzle senate boiling water | 03/20/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 10:00 PM Author: Crimson Aggressive Potus
lol this is like the 3rd sentence of "the concept of the collective unconscious":
the contents of the collective unconscious have
never been in consciousness, and therefore have never been
individually acquired, but owe their existence exclusively to
heredity.
lol JP come on man
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923288&forum_id=2#35641745) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 10:07 PM Author: green razzle-dazzle senate boiling water
No, I am saying that proof of God is just as feasible as proof that your life is not a dream of some silicon-based creature in a matrix-plugged cocoon.
You make an assumption that your life is real and conduct yourself accordingly, to your benefit, and to the benefit of other people.
You make an assumption that God is real and conduct yourself accordingly, to your benefit, and to the benefit of other people.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923288&forum_id=2#35641796) |
|
|