In Peterson's defense he is completely derivative
| titillating cumskin | 03/19/18 | | titillating cumskin | 03/19/18 | | demanding private investor | 03/19/18 | | titillating cumskin | 03/19/18 | | poppy crackhouse | 03/19/18 | | titillating cumskin | 03/19/18 | | poppy crackhouse | 03/19/18 | | titillating cumskin | 03/19/18 | | poppy crackhouse | 03/19/18 | | titillating cumskin | 03/20/18 | | poppy crackhouse | 03/20/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 10:00 PM Author: titillating cumskin
lol this is like the 3rd sentence of "the concept of the collective unconscious":
the contents of the collective unconscious have
never been in consciousness, and therefore have never been
individually acquired, but owe their existence exclusively to
heredity.
lol JP come on man
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923288&forum_id=2#35641745) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2018 10:07 PM Author: poppy crackhouse
No, I am saying that proof of God is just as feasible as proof that your life is not a dream of some silicon-based creature in a matrix-plugged cocoon.
You make an assumption that your life is real and conduct yourself accordingly, to your benefit, and to the benefit of other people.
You make an assumption that God is real and conduct yourself accordingly, to your benefit, and to the benefit of other people.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3923288&forum_id=2#35641796) |
|
|