The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Is kind and respectful to blacks. Permanent ink on lawman8's shit list.
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 7th, 2018 11:18 AM Author: vivacious set wrinkle (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3970312&forum_id=2#35998317) |
Date: May 7th, 2018 11:20 AM Author: kink-friendly brethren roommate Proclaiming that race realism is “morally bankrupt” = lightyears away from being “kind and respectful” to individual blacks.
But I’m curious, is this nonsense how a shitlib like yourself justifies blatantly ignoring the objective truths behind race realism? Acknowledging the truth wouldn’t be “kind or respectful” so it’s better to keep it hidden? |
 |
Date: May 7th, 2018 11:22 AM Author: vivacious set wrinkle At best, race realism proves what? The mean black person is below the mean white person? How and why should that inform how I deal with individual whites or blacks? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3970312&forum_id=2#35998354) |
|
Date: May 7th, 2018 11:25 AM Author: kink-friendly brethren roommate I never said it did. That was a bullshit strawman that you created in making this thread.
|
|
Date: May 7th, 2018 11:28 AM Author: vivacious set wrinkle Well then explain for my lib mind, what does race realism teach us about how one should live? How is race realism instructive?
Genuinely trying to understand what you think it proves if I accept that you are correct and race realism is “objectively” correct. Does it just prescribe policy positions on things like AA and immigration? Because I oppose AA as morally wrong and support fairly open immigration as morally correct. |
|
Date: May 7th, 2018 11:30 AM Author: kink-friendly brethren roommate It primarily should be used to oppose wasteful lib policies on education (throwing more $$$ is just a waste when the black students just don’t have the inherent ability), along with informing immigration positions.
Allowing low IQ immigrants to flood your country is destroying it from the inside. |
|
Date: May 7th, 2018 11:33 AM Author: vivacious set wrinkle Well now I am confused, because you said my argument about the mean vs. the individual was a straw man, but now you’re advocating policies that ignore the individual and are based on minor differences in mean ability. Using your logic shouldn’t we stop supporting below mean whites too? Shouldn’t we provide generous support to above mean blacks and immigrants? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3970312&forum_id=2#35998448) |
|
Date: May 7th, 2018 11:44 AM Author: kink-friendly brethren roommate First, you need to make the distinction between actual Americans and immigrants.
We owe nothing to immigrants, and owe it to Americans to do everything we can to keep low skilled, low IQ immigrants out. But certainly, I support efforts to recruit high IQ immigrants of any race.
Second, yes, we should utilize IQ in forming educational policy. I support spending money on above mean blacks and whites. Along with not spending much on the dullards of all races.
But you libs would have a problem with that, as filtering by IQ tends to have a disparate impact. |
|
Date: May 7th, 2018 11:54 AM Author: vivacious set wrinkle I think disparate impact is mostly out of date. It was a bullshit solution to bridge the country from a time when people were racist as fuck to now, when people are maybe a little bit racist. I am worried about going race neutral and focusing on IQ because I think that probably violates the EP clause for non-disparate impact reasons.
But we can end it, in my view. Great subthread, lawman8! I believe we have reached mutual understanding and agreement! |
|
Date: May 7th, 2018 12:25 PM Author: Motley business firm going race neutral and focusing on IQ because I think that probably violates the EP clause for non-disparate impact reasons
Explain. |
|
Date: May 7th, 2018 12:48 PM Author: vivacious set wrinkle You can’t write a law that treats 120 IQ people differently than 85 iq people.
IQ is mostly an immutable characteristic. |
|
Date: May 7th, 2018 2:36 PM Author: blue forum Simply permitting a meritocracy treats 120 iq people differently from 85 iq or whatever.
|
|
Date: May 7th, 2018 12:57 PM Author: Concupiscible sound barrier psychic I cant disagree w any of this b
|
|
Date: May 7th, 2018 12:04 PM Author: Concupiscible sound barrier psychic There's only one way to think, apparently. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3970312&forum_id=2#35998644) |
|
Date: May 7th, 2018 12:05 PM Author: Concupiscible sound barrier psychic I'm nice as fuck and super respectful in all my interactions w blacks, and strive to get the best results for them at all times. I'm also a race realist. So, I guess I'm on a shit list too? |
|
Date: May 7th, 2018 12:42 PM Author: vivacious set wrinkle For many, many reasons. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3970312&forum_id=2#35998966) |
|
Date: May 7th, 2018 12:49 PM Author: Concupiscible sound barrier psychic Why? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3970312&forum_id=2#35999040) |