\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

How Soviet Diesel Engines Won World War II

Stalin and communism made many mistakes in ww2 that could ha...
Silver Lodge
  05/19/18
...
Silver Lodge
  05/20/18
German casualties on Eastern front: 2.7 million Soviet cas...
indigo trailer park wagecucks
  05/20/18
"In the end the war was won because the Russians better...
Alcoholic Mental Disorder
  05/20/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: May 19th, 2018 10:27 PM
Author: Silver Lodge

Stalin and communism made many mistakes in ww2 that could have lost the war .The greatest decision/strength they had was their industrial power and you could argue the Diesel engine.

Stalin was prepared for a long drawn out war enduring Russian winters. Hitler and Germany were geared towards a 12 to 15 week campaign where the need to light fires under a petrol engine just to get it going was not considered .

The development of the Diesel engine in the 30s by the Soviets was a key factor in winning the war. People talk about the decision by the Germans to split their attack in 1941 and 1942 as being decisive. I believe that the decision by the soviets to mass produce medium and heavy tanks KV and T34 with Diesel engines in the late 30s made a major contribution to the outcome . This was matched by Germany's decision to ignore the possibility of a winter war and the need for big guns on their tanks . By the time they realised their mistake it was too late.

The Panther tank never worked properly and was ill suited to the environment it operated in. The Tiger whilst a great tank broke down too often and couldn't be produced in sufficient numbers . These problems were not due to decisions in the war they were due to decisions before the war even started.

In the end the war was won because the Russians better judged, in advance, what the war would be like and prepared for it. Diesel engines played a part in that. Germany did not for forsee a long conflict and as a result didn't see the need for complexities such as Diesel engines. This was just important in them losing as was any tactical or strategic mistake they made on the battlefield.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981689&forum_id=2#36087493)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 20th, 2018 2:02 AM
Author: Silver Lodge



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981689&forum_id=2#36088665)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 20th, 2018 2:12 AM
Author: indigo trailer park wagecucks

German casualties on Eastern front: 2.7 million

Soviet casualties: 9 million (not counting civilians)

yeah but it was their "diesels" that "won" them the war

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981689&forum_id=2#36088686)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 20th, 2018 4:02 AM
Author: Alcoholic Mental Disorder

"In the end the war was won because the Russians better judged, in advance, what the war would be like and prepared for it."

Or they prepared to fight the only war they could win.

"he need to light fires under a petrol engine just to get it going"

As a general matter, diesel engines are much more difficult to start in cold weather than gas engines.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3981689&forum_id=2#36088929)