An organization doesn't get confident enough to literally spy on an entire presidential campaign, and then after he wins try to frame Trump & impeach him, unless they have been doing this under the radar for many, many, many years to far less visible people.

And it's not just the political appointees, which come and go. It is the unelected civil service underneath them which voted 90% for Hillary in 2016 (not flame -- 90% of DC voted for Hillary).

We may have an opportunity to drive a stake through the heart of not just Obama, not just the Democrat party, but the entire shitlib unelected civil service and their media enablers if Trump/Sessions/Huber/Horowitz play their cards perfectly.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3982270&forum_id=2#36091840)

Horse trading in "democracies" and engineering coups if and when desirable to entrenched and moneyed elites.

Key differences between this go round and prior:

1. Technology/internet has removed the stranglehold that controlled media had on the flow of information.

2. Years of affirmative action have injured badly the effectiveness and adaptability of the deep state operational ability. Let's face it, Hillary only lost because of her deeply incompetent campaign, which was led by a literal 33 year old fag, and a gaggle of urm's given posts for diversity reasons.

These two factors have combined to result in the unelected bureaucracy getting caught with its figurative pants down in engaging in the same kind of behavior it always has.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3982270&forum_id=2#36091906)