Creating conflict between insurance defense attorneys and the adjusters
| Haunting crusty community account bbw | 05/26/18 | | bat-shit-crazy background story | 05/26/18 | | Elite athletic conference tanning salon | 05/26/18 | | Haunting crusty community account bbw | 05/26/18 | | lavender hall | 05/26/18 | | sooty masturbator | 05/28/18 | | Sexy Corn Cake | 05/29/18 | | lavender hall | 05/26/18 | | puce cuck knife | 05/28/18 | | lavender hall | 05/29/18 | | Haunting crusty community account bbw | 05/27/18 | | thriller psychic boistinker | 05/27/18 | | Haunting crusty community account bbw | 05/28/18 | | Haunting crusty community account bbw | 05/28/18 | | sooty masturbator | 05/28/18 | | Haunting crusty community account bbw | 05/28/18 | | Dark Pit Filthpig | 05/28/18 | | Aromatic market | 05/28/18 | | Haunting crusty community account bbw | 05/28/18 | | chocolate point pistol | 05/28/18 | | lavender hall | 05/29/18 | | thriller psychic boistinker | 05/29/18 | | Marvelous Tan Becky Spot | 05/29/18 | | Hilarious Slate Haunted Graveyard | 05/29/18 | | Bronze Deer Antler | 05/29/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 26th, 2018 7:30 PM Author: Haunting crusty community account bbw
One of the things I want to master as a plaintiff lawyer is to create discomfort between the ID attorneys, the adjusters and the clients.
I received an email from an ID attorney on Friday morning that was specifically designed to protect the insurance company and expose her client to potentially unlimited liability. I want to expose this in my response and make it so that this attorney is forced to cave to our demand or recuse herself from the case. Her letter was so strongly drafted to protect the insurance company that it explicitly twisted my words and tries to imply something I didn’t even say.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3987270&forum_id=2#36133177) |
|
Date: May 28th, 2018 4:28 PM Author: sooty masturbator
Something plaintiff bros do where I practice is include a brief narrative in this type of letter where the insured was relieved of his duty to cooperate under the policy due to a conflict created by coverage issues. They specifically mention the name of the friendly plaintiffs attorney that stepped in to "defend" the insured during the setup of the insurance company. They also mention that the insured actually realized a nice little recovery on the bad faith claim.
They do this to provide the insured a step-by-step guide on what they need to do to get their own attorney, and by including the name of the attorney from the other case that represented the defendant, they not so subtly suggest who the insured should contact. Obviously, the same strategy can be used during the insured's deposition.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3987270&forum_id=2#36141036)
|
|
|