Creating conflict between insurance defense attorneys and the adjusters
| well-lubricated diverse office | 05/26/18 | | aphrodisiac lilac french chef | 05/26/18 | | Overrated boiling water | 05/26/18 | | well-lubricated diverse office | 05/26/18 | | Passionate Institution | 05/26/18 | | Dead talented marketing idea | 05/28/18 | | Vigorous Trump Supporter Messiness | 05/29/18 | | Passionate Institution | 05/26/18 | | Fluffy stimulating brunch | 05/28/18 | | Passionate Institution | 05/29/18 | | well-lubricated diverse office | 05/27/18 | | Big Amethyst Heaven | 05/27/18 | | well-lubricated diverse office | 05/28/18 | | well-lubricated diverse office | 05/28/18 | | Dead talented marketing idea | 05/28/18 | | well-lubricated diverse office | 05/28/18 | | vibrant casino | 05/28/18 | | Maroon Galvanic House | 05/28/18 | | well-lubricated diverse office | 05/28/18 | | 180 State | 05/28/18 | | Passionate Institution | 05/29/18 | | Big Amethyst Heaven | 05/29/18 | | duck-like boltzmann | 05/29/18 | | Beady-eyed Insanely Creepy Fat Ankles Pit | 05/29/18 | | bonkers crystalline chad | 05/29/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 26th, 2018 7:30 PM Author: well-lubricated diverse office
One of the things I want to master as a plaintiff lawyer is to create discomfort between the ID attorneys, the adjusters and the clients.
I received an email from an ID attorney on Friday morning that was specifically designed to protect the insurance company and expose her client to potentially unlimited liability. I want to expose this in my response and make it so that this attorney is forced to cave to our demand or recuse herself from the case. Her letter was so strongly drafted to protect the insurance company that it explicitly twisted my words and tries to imply something I didn’t even say.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3987270&forum_id=2#36133177) |
|
Date: May 28th, 2018 4:28 PM Author: Dead talented marketing idea
Something plaintiff bros do where I practice is include a brief narrative in this type of letter where the insured was relieved of his duty to cooperate under the policy due to a conflict created by coverage issues. They specifically mention the name of the friendly plaintiffs attorney that stepped in to "defend" the insured during the setup of the insurance company. They also mention that the insured actually realized a nice little recovery on the bad faith claim.
They do this to provide the insured a step-by-step guide on what they need to do to get their own attorney, and by including the name of the attorney from the other case that represented the defendant, they not so subtly suggest who the insured should contact. Obviously, the same strategy can be used during the insured's deposition.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3987270&forum_id=2#36141036)
|
|
|